Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Quade

Case [1992] HCATrans 226


IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry

Sydney No S58 of 1991

B e t w e e n -

COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA

Appellant

and

THOMAS QUADE, MARY QUADE, SHAWN THOMAS QUADE and GERARD WILLIAM QUADE

Respondents

Consent orders

MASON CJ
BRENNAN J
DEANE J

DAWSON J

TOOHEY J

GAUDRON J McHUGH .J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON FRIDAY, 7 AUGUST 1992, AT 9.48 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

Quade(3) 1 7/8/92
MASON CJ:  The Registrar has certified that he holds a

consent duly signed by the solicitors for the
parties in this matter to the making of an order in

the following terms:

1. that the appeal be dismissed;

2.  that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application for special leave

and of the appeal.

There will accordingly be a consent order in those

terms.

AT 9.49 AM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE

Quade 7/8/92
Details
AGLC
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Quade [1992] HCATrans 226
Case
[1992] HCATrans 226
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Commonwealth Bank of Australia appealed to the High Court of Australia against a decision concerning Thomas Quade, Mary Quade, Shawn Thomas Quade, and Gerard William Quade. The specific nature of the dispute and the decision under appeal are not detailed in the provided transcript.

The High Court was presented with an application for special leave to appeal. The central legal issue was whether special leave to appeal should be granted.

The parties, through their solicitors, had executed a consent to an order. This consent indicated an agreement that the appeal should be dismissed and that the applicant, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, should bear the respondents' costs associated with the application for special leave.

Accordingly, the High Court made a consent order dismissing the appeal and ordering the Commonwealth Bank of Australia to pay the respondents' costs of the application for special leave.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.