High Court Bulletin

Link copied
Case Copied 43 min read

High Court Bulletin

Produced by the Legal Research Officer,
High Court of Australia Library


[2021] HCAB 8 (15 October 2021)

A record of recent High Court of Australia cases: decided, reserved for judgment, awaiting hearing in the Court’s original jurisdiction, granted special leave to appeal, refused special leave to appeal and not proceeding or vacated

1: Summary of New Entries
2: Cases Handed Down
3: Cases Reserved
4: Original Jurisdiction
5: Section 40 Removal
6: Special Leave Granted
7: Cases Not Proceeding or Vacated
8: Special Leave Refused

1: Summary of New Entries

2: Cases Handed Down

Case

Title

Palmer v The State of Western Australia

Constitutional Law

Mineralogy Pty Ltd & Anor v State of Western Australia

Constitutional Law

Edwards v The Queen

Criminal Law

Charisteas v Charisteas & Ors

Family Law

Ridd v James Cook University

Industrial Law

3: Cases Reserved

Case

Title

Hobart International Airport Pty Ltd v Clarence City Council & Anor; Australia Pacific Airports (Launceston) Pty Ltd v Northern Midlands Council & Anor

Contracts

Walton & Anor v ACN 004 410 833 Ltd (formerly Arrium Ltd) (in liquidation) & Ors

Corporations

Bell v State of Tasmania

Criminal Law

Stubbings v Jams 2 Pty Ltd & Ors

Equity

H. Lundbeck A/S & Anor v Sandoz Pty Ltd; CNS Pharma Pty Ltd v Sandoz Pty Ltd

Patents

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Huang

Practice and Procedure

4: Original Jurisdiction

Case

Title

Farm Transparency International Ltd & Anor v State of New South Wales

Constitutional Law

5: Section 40 Removal

Case

Title

Montgomery v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs & Anor

Constitutional Law

Thoms v Commonwealth of Australia

Constitutional Law

6: Special Leave Granted

Case

Title

Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs & Anor

Administrative Law

Fairbairn v Radecki

Family Law

7: Cases Not Proceeding or Vacated

8: Special Leave Refused

2: Cases Handed Down

The following cases were handed down by the High Court of Australia during the October 2021 sittings.

Constitutional Law

Palmer v The State of Western Australia

B52/2020: [2021] HCA 31

Judgment delivered: 13 October 2021

Coram: Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Keane, Gordon, Edelman, Steward and Gleeson JJ

Catchwords:

Constitutional law 

– State Parliament – Legislative power – Where State of Western Australia entered into agreement concerning mining projects in Pilbara region with Mineralogy Pty Ltd and other parties ("co-proponents") including International Minerals Pty Ltd – Where plaintiff controller and beneficial owner of Mineralogy Pty Ltd and director of both Mineralogy Pty Ltd and International Minerals Pty Ltd – Where agreement and 2008 variation set out in schedules to, and thereby formed part of, Iron Ore Processing (Mineralogy Pty Ltd) Agreement Act 2002 (WA) ("State Act") – Where agreement provided that Mineralogy Pty Ltd, alone or with co-proponent, could submit proposals to relevant Minister regarding projects – Where Mineralogy Pty Ltd and International Minerals Pty Ltd submitted proposals to Minister in 2012 and 2013 – Where disputes in relation to 2012 proposal referred to arbitration, resulting in arbitral awards in…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read High Court Bulletin and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] HCAB 8
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The High Court of Australia heard and delivered decisions in several cases during the October 2021 sittings. In Palmer v The State of Western Australia, the Court held that the Iron Ore Processing (Mineralogy Pty Ltd) Agreement Amendment Act 2020 (WA) was not invalid on the basis that it amounted to an exercise of adjudicative authority or constituted a bill of pains and penalties. In Mineralogy Pty Ltd & Anor v State of Western Australia, the Court found that the manner of enactment of the Amending Act did not contravene s 6 of the Australia Act 1986 (Cth) and that the provisions of the State Act were not incompatible with Chapter III of the Constitution. In Edwards v The Queen, the Court found that the prosecution had not failed to give full and proper pre-trial disclosure and that there was no miscarriage of justice. In Charisteas v Charisteas & Ors, the Court allowed the appeal and set aside the orders of the Family Court of Western Australia on the basis that the trial judge might reasonably have been apprehended of bias. In Ridd v James Cook University, the Court dismissed the appeal and held that the exercise of intellectual freedom was subject to constraints in the Code of Conduct and the obligations of confidentiality in the Enterprise Agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.