Watson v Qantas Airways Limited [2009] NSWCA 322 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S):
22 June 2009
JUDGMENT DATE:
8 October 2009
JUDGMENT OF:
Allsop P at 1; Beazley JA at 1; McColl JA at 1; Basten JA at 69; Handley AJA at 1
DECISION:
1. Appeal allowed. 2. The decision of the Workers Compensation Commission of 26 June 2008 be set aside. 3. The matter be remitted to the Commission for rehearing. 4. The respondent pay the appellant's costs.
CATCHWORDS:
WORKERS' COMPENSATION – entitlement to compensation - injury in the course of employment or arising out of employment – injury occurring away from place of employment – injury occurring away from employee’s home –characterisation of overall period of work – circumstances of injury in context of identified overall period of work - WORKERS' COMPENSATION – appeal from Workers Compensation Commission – error in point of law – error apparent in expression of principle - failure to direct adequately to test in binding High Court authority - Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) – s 4 - s 9 - WORDS AND PHRASES –“in the course of employment” – “arising out of employment”
[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.
[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.
[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.
Consideration
[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.
[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.
Continue reading Watson v Qantas Airways Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
Details
AGLC
Watson v Qantas Airways Ltd [2009] NSWCA 322
Case
[2009] NSWCA 322
Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal in *Watson v Qantas Airways Ltd* concerned a dispute over an employee's entitlement to workers' compensation. The case was heard in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the Workers Compensation Commission had erred in law in its determination of the appellant's claim, specifically concerning the interpretation and application of the phrases "in the course of employment" and "arising out of employment" under the *Workers Compensation Act 1987* (NSW). The court was required to consider whether the Commission had adequately directed itself to the binding authority of the High Court regarding injuries occurring away from the usual place of employment and the employee's home, and how to characterise an overall period of work in such circumstances.
The Court of Appeal found that the Commission had made an error of law in its assessment of the appellant's claim. The court reasoned that the Commission had failed to properly apply the relevant legal tests established by High Court authority when considering the circumstances of the injury in the context of the overall period of work. Consequently, the Commission's decision did not adequately reflect the principles governing compensation for injuries sustained away from the traditional workplace.
The appeal was allowed, the decision of the Workers Compensation Commission was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the Commission for a rehearing. The respondent was ordered to pay the appellant's costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Appeal allowed.
2. The decision of the Workers Compensation Commission of 26 June 2008 be set aside.
3. The matter be remitted to the Commission for rehearing.