Wagner v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 74 min read

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Wagner & Ors v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd & Ors [2018] QSC 201 

PARTIES:

DENIS WAGNER

(first plaintiff)
JOHN WAGNER
(second plaintiff)
NEILL WAGNER
(third plaintiff)
JOE WAGNER
(fourth plaintiff)

v
HARBOUR RADIO PTY LTD (ACN 010 853 317)

(first defendant)
ALAN BELFORD JONES
(second defendant)
RADIO 4BC BRISBANE PTY LTD (ACN 009 662 784)
(third defendant)
NICHOLAS CHARLES CATER
(fourth defendant)

FILE NO/S:

No 10830 of 2015

DIVISION:

Trial

PROCEEDING:

Trial

ORIGINATING COURT:

Supreme Court at Brisbane

DELIVERED ON:

12 September 2018

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATES:

30 April-4 May, 8-11 May, 14-15 May, 17-18 May, 21‑25 May, 28-30 May, 13-14 June 2018.  Further written submissions 15 June 2018.

JUDGE:

Flanagan J

ORDERS:

(a)  First Plaintiff

       As against the first defendant and second defendant

1.     It is ordered that the first and second defendants pay to the first plaintiff damages for defamation in the sum of $750,000 plus interest in the amount of $78,102.74 for the publications pleaded at paragraphs 10, 13, 16, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 95, 97, 101, 103, 106 and 109 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018.

       As against the second defendant and the third defendant

2.     It is ordered that the second defendant and the third defendant pay to the first plaintiff damages for defamation in the sum of $100,000 plus interest in the amount of $10,643.84 for the publications pleaded at paragraphs 22 and 26 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018.

Injunction

3.     The first defendant is permanently restrained, by itself and/or its servants or agents, from publishing or causing to be published:

(a)      any of the 27 matters complained of in paragraphs 10, 13, 16, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 95, 97, 101, 103, 106 and 109 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018 in these proceedings or matters substantially to the same effect as those matters complained of; and

(b)     any of the imputations in Attachment 35 to these Reasons of and concerning the first plaintiff, or any imputation that does not differ in substance to any of those imputations.

4.     The second defendant is permanently restrained, by himself and/or his servants or agents, from publishing or causing to be published:

(a)      any of the 29 matters complained of in paragraphs 10, 13, 16, 22, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 95, 97, 101, 103, 106 and 109 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018 in these proceedings or matters substantially to the same effect as those matters complained of; and

(b)     any of the imputations in Attachment 35 to these Reasons of and concerning the first plaintiff, or any imputation…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Wagner v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] QSC 201
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Wagner v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd was a defamation case heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland. The plaintiffs, the Wagner family, brought the action against the defendants, Harbour Radio and two of its employees, for allegedly defamatory statements made in connection with the Grantham Floods of 2011 and the construction of Wellcamp Airport. The defendants admitted to publishing the statements, but raised several defences, including justification, substantial and contextual truth, and fair report of matters of public concern. They also argued that the plaintiffs' refusal to accept their offer of amends was a defence in itself.

The court had to determine whether the statements were defamatory and, if so, whether the defendants' defences were valid. It also had to assess the damages, considering whether prior publications could be used to aggravate the award, and whether the statutory cap on damages for non-economic loss applied. The court needed to consider whether the plaintiffs' other defamation actions could mitigate the damages awarded in this case.

The court found that the statements were defamatory and rejected the defendants' defences. It held that the plaintiffs were entitled to damages for the publications in question. The court also found that prior publications could be used to aggravate the damages, but the statutory cap on non-economic loss damages was still a relevant factor in the assessment. The plaintiffs' other defamation actions did not mitigate the damages in this case. The court ordered the defendants to pay substantial damages to each plaintiff and issued injunctions to prevent future publications of the defamatory statements. The plaintiffs' claims against the fourth defendant were dismissed, and the court reserved the matter of costs for later determination.

Orders

Orders of the court

(a) First Plaintiff

As against the first defendant and second defendant

1. It is ordered that the first and second defendants pay to the first plaintiff damages for defamation in the sum of $750,000 plus interest in the amount of $78,102.74 for the publications pleaded at paragraphs 10, 13, 16, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 95, 97, 101, 103, 106 and 109 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018.

As against the second defendant and the third defendant

2. It is ordered that the second defendant and the third defendant pay to the first plaintiff damages for defamation in the sum of $100,000 plus interest in the amount of $10,643.84 for the publications pleaded at paragraphs 22 and 26 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018.

Injunction

3. The first defendant is permanently restrained, by itself and/or its servants or agents, from publishing or causing to be published:

(a) any of the 27 matters complained of in paragraphs 10, 13, 16, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 95, 97, 101, 103, 106 and 109 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018 in these proceedings or matters substantially to the same effect as those matters complained of; and

(b) any of the imputations in Attachment 35 to these Reasons of and concerning the first plaintiff, or any imputation that does not differ in substance to any of those imputations.

4. The second defendant is permanently restrained, by himself and/or his servants or agents, from publishing or causing to be published:

(a) any of the 29 matters complained of in paragraphs 10, 13, 16, 22, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 95, 97, 101, 103, 106 and 109 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018 in these proceedings or matters substantially to the same effect as those matters complained of; and

(b) any of the imputations in Attachment 35 to these Reasons of and concerning the first plaintiff, or any imputation that does not differ in substance to any of those imputations.

5. The third defendant is permanently restrained, by itself and/or its servants or agents, from publishing or causing to be published:

(a) any of the 2 matters complained of in paragraphs 22 and 26 of the amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018 in these proceedings or matters substantially to the same effect as those matters complained of; and

(b) any of the imputations in Attachment 35 to these Reasons of and concerning the first plaintiff, or any imputation that does not differ in substance to any of those imputations.

(b) Second Plaintiff

As against the first defendant and second defendant

6. It is ordered that the first and second defendants pay to the second plaintiff damages for defamation in the sum of $750,000 plus interest in the amount of $78,102.74 for the publications pleaded at paragraphs 10, 13, 16, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 95, 97, 101, 103, 106 and 109 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018.

As against the second defendant and the third defendant

7. It is ordered that the second defendant and the third defendant pay to the second plaintiff damages for defamation in the sum of $100,000 plus interest in the amount of $10,643.84 for the publications pleaded at paragraphs 22 and 26 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018.

Injunction

8. The first defendant is permanently restrained, by itself and/or its servants or agents, from publishing or causing to be published:

(a) any of the 27 matters complained of in paragraphs 10, 13, 16, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 95, 97, 101, 103, 106 and 109 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018 in these proceedings or matters substantially to the same effect as those matters complained of; and

(b) any of the imputations in Attachment 35 to these Reasons of and concerning the second plaintiff, or any imputation that does not differ in substance to any of those imputations.

9. The second defendant is permanently restrained, by himself and/or his servants or agents, from publishing or causing to be published:

(a) any of the 29 matters complained of in paragraphs 10, 13, 16, 22, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 95, 97, 101, 103, 106 and 109 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018 in these proceedings or matters substantially to the same effect as those matters complained of; and

(b) any of the imputations in Attachment 35 to these Reasons of and concerning the second plaintiff, or any imputation that does not differ in substance to any of those imputations.

10. The third defendant is permanently restrained, by itself and/or its servants or agents, from publishing or causing to be published:

(a) any of the 2 matters complained of in paragraphs 22 and 26 of the amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018 in these proceedings or matters substantially to the same effect as those matters complained of; and

(b) any of the imputations in Attachment 35 to these Reasons of and concerning the second plaintiff, or any imputation that does not differ in substance to any of those imputations.

(c) Third Plaintiff

As against the first defendant and second defendant

11. It is ordered that the first and second defendants pay to the third plaintiff damages for defamation in the sum of $750,000 plus interest in the amount of $78,102.74 for the publications pleaded at paragraphs 10, 13, 16, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 95, 97, 101, 103, 106 and 109 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018.

As against the second defendant and the third defendant

12. It is ordered that the second defendant and the third defendant pay to the third plaintiff damages for defamation in the sum of $100,000 plus interest in the amount of $10,643.84 for the publications pleaded at paragraphs 22 and 26 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018.

Injunction

13. The first defendant is permanently restrained, by itself and/or its servants or agents, from publishing or causing to be published:

(a) any of the 27 matters complained of in paragraphs 10, 13, 16, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 95, 97, 101, 103, 106 and 109 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018 in these proceedings or matters substantially to the same effect as those matters complained of; and

(b) any of the imputations in Attachment 35 to these Reasons of and concerning the third plaintiff, or any imputation that does not differ in substance to any of those imputations.

14. The second defendant is permanently restrained, by himself and/or his servants or agents, from publishing or causing to be published:

(a) any of the 29 matters complained of in paragraphs 10, 13, 16, 22, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 95, 97, 101, 103, 106 and 109 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018 in these proceedings or matters substantially to the same effect as those matters complained of; and

(b) any of the imputations in Attachment 35 to these Reasons of and concerning the third plaintiff, or any imputation that does not differ in substance to any of those imputations.

15. The third defendant is permanently restrained, by itself and/or its servants or agents, from publishing or causing to be published:

(a) any of the 2 matters complained of in paragraphs 22 and 26 of the amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018 in these proceedings or matters substantially to the same effect as those matters complained of; and

(b) any of the imputations in Attachment 35 to these Reasons of and concerning the third plaintiff, or any imputation that does not differ in substance to any of those imputations.

(d) Fourth Plaintiff

As against the first defendant and second defendant

16. It is ordered that the first and second defendants pay to the fourth plaintiff damages for defamation in the sum of $750,000 plus interest in the amount of $78,102.74 for the publications pleaded at paragraphs 10, 13, 16, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 95, 97, 101, 103, 106 and 109 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018.

As against the second defendant and the third defendant

17. It is ordered that the second defendant and the third defendant pay to the fourth plaintiff damages for defamation in the sum of $100,000 plus interest in the amount of $10,643.84 for the publications pleaded at paragraphs 22 and 26 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018.

Injunction

18. The first defendant is permanently restrained, by itself and/or its servants or agents, from publishing or causing to be published:

(a) any of the 27 matters complained of in paragraphs 10, 13, 16, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 95, 97, 101, 103, 106 and 109 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018 in these proceedings or matters substantially to the same effect as those matters complained of; and

(b) any of the imputations in Attachment 35 to these Reasons of and concerning the fourth plaintiff, or any imputation that does not differ in substance to any of those imputations.

19. The second defendant is permanently restrained, by himself and/or his servants or agents, from publishing or causing to be published:

(a) any of the 29 matters complained of in paragraphs 10, 13, 16, 22, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 95, 97, 101, 103, 106 and 109 of the second further amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018 in these proceedings or matters substantially to the same effect as those matters complained of; and

(b) any of the imputations in Attachment 35 to these Reasons of and concerning the fourth plaintiff, or any imputation that does not differ in substance to any of those imputations.

20. The third defendant is permanently restrained, by itself and/or its servants or agents, from publishing or causing to be published:

(a) any of the 2 matters complained of in paragraphs 22 and 26 of the amended statement of claim filed on 30 April 2018 in these proceedings or matters substantially to the same effect as those matters complained of; and

(b) any of the imputations in Attachment 35 to these Reasons of and concerning the fourth plaintiff, or any imputation that does not differ in substance to any of those imputations.

(e) First, Second, Third and Fourth Plaintiffs

21. The plaintiffs’ claims against the fourth defendant are dismissed.

22. I will hear the parties as to costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.