Park v Kim

Case [2019] NSWDC 609


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Park v Kim [2019] NSWDC 609
Hearing dates: 17 October 2019
Date of orders: 31 October 2019
Decision date: 31 October 2019
Jurisdiction:Civil
Before: Gibson DCJ
Decision:

(1) Pursuant to r 28.2 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), imputations 7(a) to 7(f) struck out as not reasonably capable of being conveyed.
(2) Leave to replead refused.
(3) Statement of claim struck out and dismissed pursuant to r 28.4 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW).
(4) Plaintiff pay defendant’s costs.
(5) Liberty to apply in relation to costs.

Catchwords: TORT – defamation – church bulletin setting out parish affairs refers to “intensive discussion” about the plaintiff’s position on the Management Committee being the subject of a forthcoming meeting – capacity of imputations – application for summary dismissal on the basis of no defamatory meaning – proceedings struck out and dismissed pursuant to UCPR r 28.4
Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 28.2 and 28.4
Cases Cited: Barrow v Herald & Weekly Times Ltd [2015] VSC 263
Berezovsky & Anor v Forbes Inc & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 1251
Bik v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1979] 2 NSWLR 679
Corby v Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 227
Crampton v Nugawela (1996) 41 NSWLR 176
Darby v Oxford University Press [2000] NSWSC 948
Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto [1995] 2 SCR 1130
NHB Enterprises Pty Ltd (t/as Bova Compounding) v Sydney Magazine Publishers Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1163
Robertson v Newquest (Sunday Herald) Ltd & Ors [2006] CSOH 97
Sali v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2013] VSC 388
Sergi v Australian Broadcasting Commission [1983] 2 NSWLR 669
Trkulja v Google LLC [2018] HCA 25
Wagner v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2018] QSC 201
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Plaintiff: Hee Yeul Park
Defendant: Beom Seok Kim
Representation:

Counsel:
Plaintiff: Mr J Manner
Defendant: Mr T Senior

  Solicitors:
Plaintiff: Jacobs Legal
Defendant: MinterEllison
File Number(s): 2019/231070
Publication restriction: None

Judgment

  1. This is an application pursuant to r 28.4 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) (“UCPR”) for summary dismissal of proceedings for defamation commenced by statement of claim filed on 19 July 2019. In the alternative, the defendant challenges the capacity of all imputations pleaded pursuant to UCPR r 28.2.

The matter complained of and imputations

  1. The matter complained of is an extract from a church bulletin which is headed “Today’s Sermon”. Although four publications are pleaded, these are essentially the same, as these relates to the services held at four different times, as follows:

  1. The first matter complained of – 8am on 7 April 2019;

  2. The second matter complained of – 10am on 7 April 2019;

  3. The third matter complained of – 12pm on 7 April 2019; and

  4. The fourth matter complained of – 7 April 2019 at a time which is not particularised.

  1. The matter complained of was published in the Korean language. The agreed English translation of the matter complained of is as follows:

1

10. Appeal…

Continue reading Park v Kim

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Park v Kim [2019] NSWDC 609
Case
[2019] NSWDC 609
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Park v Kim involved a defamation claim arising from content published in a church bulletin. The plaintiff, Park, alleged that certain statements in the bulletin were defamatory, specifically mentioning an "intensive discussion" about the plaintiff’s position on the Management Committee being the subject of an upcoming meeting. Kim, the defendant, applied for summary dismissal on the grounds that the statements were not reasonably capable of being defamatory.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the statements in the bulletin were capable of conveying a defamatory meaning. The court had to determine if the bulletin's content could reasonably be interpreted as defamatory towards Park. This required an analysis of the language used and its potential impact on Park's reputation within the context of the parish community.

In assessing the statements, the court concluded that they were not reasonably capable of conveying a defamatory meaning. The bulletin was intended to inform parishioners about upcoming discussions and did not target Park in a manner that would lower him in the estimation of right-thinking members of society. Consequently, the imputations identified by Park were struck out, and the court dismissed the statement of claim pursuant to rule 28.4 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW). The plaintiff was also ordered to pay the defendant’s costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Pursuant to r 28.2 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), imputations 7(a) to 7(f) struck out as not reasonably capable of being conveyed.

(2) Leave to replead refused.

(3) Statement of claim struck out and dismissed pursuant to r 28.4 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW).

(4) Plaintiff pay defendant’s costs.

(5) Liberty to apply in relation to costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.