SZJTQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

RARES J BACKGKROUND THE APPELLANTS’ CLAIMS THE ISSUES ON THIS APPEAL THE FIRST GROUND:  DID THE TRIBUNAL ERR IN ITS APPROACH TO THE APPLICATION OF THE ONE CHILD POLICY TO EACH APPELLANT? THE TRIBUNAL’S REASONS Accordingly DFAT REPORT 404 strictly enforces CONSIDERATION:  DOES THE TRIBUNAL HAVE TO MAKE ITS DECISION ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO IT? which he has actual or constructive knowledge OTHER BASES FOR CHALLENGING THE TRIBUNAL’S FINDINGS ON THE ONE CHILD POLICY DID THE TRIBUNAL MAKE ANY FINDINGS ON WHEN THE SOCIAL COMPENSATION FEE WOULD BE PAID FOR “S”? THE SECOND GROUND:  DID THE TRIBUNAL ERR BY FAILING TO DEAL WITH THE FATHER’S CLAIM THAT HE WOULD CONTINUE TO BREACH THE ONE CHILD POLICY? CONCLUSION