de Robillard v Council of the New South Wales Bar Association; Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v de Robillard (No 2)
[2024] NSWCA 299
Citation 1
(Para 93)
…The High Court dismissed an appeal by Ms Wentworth: Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239; [1992] HCA 24. The joint judgment of Deane, Dawson, Toohey and Gaudron JJ observed at 248 that the NSW Bar Association is a company limited by guarantee, that its Articles of Association provide for “a Council of the Association” and…
EMJ18 v Secretary, Department of Home Affairs
[2024] FCAFC 87
Citation 2
(Para 26)
…one matter can be regarded as an indication that other matters are excluded. In any event, this maxim should be applied with caution: see, e.g., Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 250 (Deane, Dawson, Toohey and Gaudron JJ); DC Pearce, Statutory Interpretation in Australia (10th ed, LexisNexis) at [4.64]. This is espe…
Vida & Vida
[2023] FedCFamC1A 175
Citation 3
(Para 29)
…y clear and unambiguous language in the Regulations intended that those ordinary notions of procedural fairness apply to arbitrations under the Act ( Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 252; Disorganized Developments Pty Ltd v South Australia (2023) 97 ALJR 575 at [33]).…
Snezana Angeleska v Victorian Legal Admissions Board
[2023] VSCA 220
Citation 4
(Para 2)
…y disclosed, and whether what is eventually disclosed is capable of leading to a finding of unfitness for admission.[67] [65]Reasons, [16] citing Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239, 250–1 (Deane, Dawson, Toohey & Gaudron JJ). [66]Reasons, [20]. [67]Reasons, [22] (citations omitted).…
In the matter of an application by Jashneel Prakash for admission to the Legal Profession
[2022] QCA 224
Citation 5
(Para 26)
…urt must be satisfied the person is suitable to be put before the public as a fit and proper person to be a legal practitioner. [5]Referring to Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 251 and Gregory v Queensland Law Society Incorporated [2002] 2 Qd R 583 at 587.…
A Judicial Officer v The Judicial Conduct Commissioner and the Judicial Conduct Panel
[2022] SASCA 42
Citation 6
…rapp v Mackie [1979] 1 All ER 489; Valente v R (1985) 2 SCR 673; Wainohu v New South Wales (2011) 243 CLR 181; Watson v M'Ewan [1905] AC 480; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239; Willis v Sir George Gipps (1846) 13 ER 536; Wilson v Minister for Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Affairs (1996) 189 CLR 1, considered.…
Legal Profession Board of Tasmania v Lester
[2021] TASSC 41
Citation 7
…he Supreme Court of NSW v P [2003] NSWCA 320 ; Re Weare; In Re Solicitors' Act 1888 [1893] 2 QB 439; Scott v Law Society of Tasmania [2009] TASSC 12; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239; Ziems v Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of NSW (1957) 97 CLR 279, referred to.…
Elliott v Lindholm
[2020] VSCA 260
Citation 8
(Para 1)
…under s 29, read together with s 16 of the Civil Procedure Act , which imposes the paramount duty to further the administration of justice.[62] [60] Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239, 246 (Brennan J), 251–2 (Deane, Dawson, Toohey and Gaudron JJ) (‘ Wentworth ’); Sharp v Rangott (2008) 167 FCR 225, 227 [3] (Gray and Nor…
Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd
[2018] HCA 4
Citation 9
(Para 10)
…n JJ agreeing), 142 per Wilson J (Dawson J agreeing). [173] Hockey v Yelland (1984) 157 CLR 124 at 130 per Gibbs CJ (Brennan and Dawson JJ agreeing); Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 252; [1992] HCA 24; Jamieson v The Queen (1993) 177 CLR 574 at 596 per Gaudron J; Darling Casino Ltd v NSW Casino Control Authority (1…
Re Ayobi
[2018] QCA 1
Citation 10
(Para 16)
…tach to admission as a legal practitioner. However, where an applicant falls short, it is not just a matter of inter parties civil litigation.[3] [3] Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239, 250-251.…
Jordan v Persse
[2017] SASC 133
Citation 11
(Para 13)
…the question of who may practice the profession of law in other jurisdictions of the federation. [17] Supreme Court Act 1935 (SA) s 17(2). [18] Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 2389 at 251-252 (Deane, Dawson, Toohey and Gaudron JJ).…
Viscariello v Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner
[2017] SASCFC 98
Citation 12
…rm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck & Sons (2014) 254 CLR 247; O’Grady v Northern Queensland Co Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 356; A v Hayden (No 2) (1984) 156 CLR 532; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239; NH v Director of Public Prosecutions (SA) (2016) 90 ALJR 978, considered.…
Richardson v Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner
[2017] SASC 30
Citation 13
…CLR 541; House v King (1936) 55 CLR 499; Ulowski v Miller [1968] SASR 277, applied. Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v AIRC (2000) 203 CLR 194; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239; Law Society of South Australia v Murphy (1999) 201 LSJS 456; NSW Bar Association v Evatt (1968) 117 CLR 177; Legal Practitioners Conduct Boa…
In the matter of an application by Joy Onyeledo (No 2)
[2016] NTSC 68
Citation 14
…) NTLR 102; Re Liveri [2006] QCA 152; Re OG (a Lawyer) (2007) 18 VR 164; Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents Board [1979] 22 SASR 70; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239, applied Connop v Law Society Northern Territory [2016] NTSC 38; In the matter of an application by Joy Onyeledo [2015] NTSC 60; In the matter of an ap…
In the matter of an application for admission as a legal practitioner by JY
[2016] QCA 324
Citation 15
(Para 20)
…se. Generalizations relating to questions of character and moral fitness… should not be treated as if they were propositions of law”.[10] [9] Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 251; Gregory v Queensland Law Society Incorporated [2002] 2 Qd R 583 at 587. [10] Ex parte Lenehan (1948) 77 CLR 403 at 422.…
Rosebridge Nominees Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [No 7]
[2016] WASC 329
Citation 16
(Para 3)
…so long as it can do so without contravening any such provision: see Taylor v Attorney-General [1975] 2 NZLR 675 at 680, 687‑8 and 692‑3; cf Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 252 ‑ 254.…
Connop v Law Society Northern Territory
[2016] NTSC 38
Citation 17
…e Queen [2015] NTCCA 5; Veghelyi v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (1989) 17 NSWLR 669; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239, referred to. ABA-ALI Committee on Continuing Professional Education Model Peer Review System 11 (Discussion Draft, 15 April 1980). G E Dal Pont, Lawyers’ Professional Responsibility (T…
In the matter of an application by Mariel Jessica Sutton
[2016] NTMC 9
Citation 18
…oard (2005) 1 Qd R 331, distinguished. Re Gadd [2013] NTSC 13; Re OG (A Lawyer) (2007) 18 VR 164; Re Onyeledo [2015] NTSC 60; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239, referred to. REPRESENTATION: Counsel: Applicant:M Crawley Law Society Northern Territory: W Roper Solicitors: Applicant:De Silva Hebron Law Society Northern Ter…
The Legal Profession Act 2006 v Sutton
[2016] NTSC 9
Citation 19
…oard (2005) 1 Qd R 331, distinguished. Re Gadd [2013] NTSC 13; Re OG (A Lawyer) (2007) 18 VR 164; Re Onyeledo [2015] NTSC 60; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239, referred to. REPRESENTATION: Counsel: Applicant:M Crawley Law Society Northern Territory: W Roper Solicitors: Applicant:De Silva Hebron Law Society Northern Ter…
In the matter of an application by Joy Onyeledo
[2015] NTSC 60
Citation 20
…sentation of conduct – Insight into academic misconduct – Application adjourned Legal Profession Act 2006 , ss 11; 25; 32; 35; 36 Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239, applied…
Day v Harness Racing New South Wales
[2014] NSWSC 1402
Citation 21
…9) 166 CLR 161 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission [1986] HCA 54; 161 CLR 141 Ucar v Nylex Industrial Products Pty Limited (2007) 17 VR 492 Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 Williams v City of Melbourne (1933) 49 CLR 142 Texts Cited: Aronson and Groves, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (5th ed 2013, Th…
Legal Practitioners Conduct Board v Warburton
[2014] SASCFC 65
Citation 22
(Para 10)
…t, the Court acts in the public interest, and not with a view to punishment: New South Wales Bar Association v Evatt (1968) 117 CLR 177 at 183-184; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 250-251. The Court is concerned to protect the public, not to punish a practitioner who has done wrong, although of course the removal o…
Legal Practitioners Conduct Board v Power
[2013] SASCFC 118
Citation 23
(Para 1)
…n important part in the administration of justice, and in which the public is entitled to place great trust.[5] [4] Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1982) 176 CLR 239, 250-251; Law Society of South Australia v Murphy (1999) 201 LSJS 456, 460-461; NSW Bar Association v Evatt (1968) 117 CLR 177, 183-184. [5] Law Societ…
Aussel re McCaffery
[2013] NSWADT 102
Citation 24
(Para 1)
…6, Harvey v Law Society of NSW (1975) 49 AUR 362; Weaver v Law Society of NSW (1979) 142 CLR 201; NSW Bar Association v Evatt (1986) 117 CLR 177; and Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239.…
Re Gadd
[2013] NTSC 13
Citation 25
…[10] Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 251.…
El-Saeidy v NSW Land & Housing Corporation
[2012] NSWSC 876
Citation 26
…rt, so long as it can do so without contravening any such provision : see Taylor v The Attorney-General (1975) 2 NZLR 675 at 680, 687-8 and 692-3. Cf Wentworth v NSW Bar Assn (1992) 66 ALJR 360 at 364." (emphasis added)…
WBM v Chief Commissioner of Police
[2012] VSCA 159
Citation 27
(Para 1)
…inoperative or largely frustrated if the right or freedom were to prevail.[61] [59] FCT v Citibank (1989) 20 FCR 404, 433 (French J, as he was then), Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239, 252, Coco v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427, 437-8 (Mason CJ, Brennan, Gaudron, McHugh JJ) ‘unmistakeable or clearly implied’, Al-Kateb v G…
Legal Practitioners Conduct Board v Clisby
[2012] SASCFC 43
Citation 28
(Para 4)
…nd is primarily concerned with protecting the public, not punishing the practitioner who has done wrong.[1] [1] Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1982) 176 CLR 239 at 250 – 251; Law Society of South Australia v Murphy (1999) 201 LSJS 456 at 460 – 461; NSW Bar Association v Evatt (1968) 117 CLR 177 at 183 – 184.…
The Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Archer
[2012] FMCA 81
Citation 29
(Para 3)
…e one hand and the Bar Council on the other was the subject of observation in the joint judgment of Deane, Dawson, Toohey and Gaudron JJ in Wentworth v NSW Bar Assn (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 248: The Bar Association is a company limited by guarantee. Its articles of association provide for “a Council of the Association” [Article 45]…
Constantinidis v Kehagiadis
[2011] NSWSC 974
Citation 30
…utomatically determined in accordance with rules and procedures in ordinary adversarial proceedings or on the same basis as adversarial proceedings - Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 250 -1.…
Legal Practitioners Conduct Board v Kayal
[2011] SASCFC 25
Citation 31
(Para 15)
…uct, the Court acts in the public interest, and not with a view to punishment: New South Wales Bar Association v Evatt (1968) 117 CLR 177 at 183-184; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 250‑251. The Court is concerned to protect the public, not to punish a practitioner who has done wrong, although of course the removal…
Coffey v State of Queensland
[2010] QCA 291
Citation 32
(Para 1)
…ithout a jury has long been regarded as a satisfactory mode of trial in many cases.[21] [20]See Tassell v Hayes (1987) 163 CLR 34 at 41, 50, cited in Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 252. [21]See, for example, Kelly v Kelly [1990] 2 Qd R 147 per Derrington J at 148, referring to Darrel Lea (Vic) Pty Ltd v Union Assu…
Legal Practitioners Conduct Board v Jones
[2009] SASC 347
Citation 33
…ANZ Insurance Cases 51-605; Legal Practitioners Conduct Board v Kerin [2006] SASC 393; Law Society (SA) v Murphy (1999) 201 LSJS 456; Wentworth v NSW Bar Assciation (1992) 176 CLR 239; Wigg v Architects Board of South Australia (1984) 36 SASR 111, considered.…
Bott v Carter
[2009] NSWSC 236
Citation 34
…SWCA 86 Shelton v National Roads and Motorist’s Association Limited (2004) 51 ACSR 278 Weaver v Law Society of New South Wales (1979) 142 CLR 201 Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 Wilson v Carter [2005] NSWSC 1351 PARTIES: David Charles Bott (Plaintiff) Trevor John Carter (First Defendant) Clive Evatt (Second Defendant)…
McIntosh v Linke Nominees Pty Ltd
[2008] QCA 410
Citation 35
(Para 1)
…e intention it expresses is discoverable upon the face of the instrument."[6] [3][1977] 2 NSWLR 955 at 962. [4]5th ed, 2001. [5](1911) 14 CLR 76. [6] Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 250.…
Burnett v Director of Public Prosecutions
[2007] NTCA 7
Citation 36
…ran v Claydon (2003) 40 MVR 506; Tringali v Stewardson Stubbs & Collett Ltd (1965) 66 SR (NSW) 335; Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239; Woolf v Trebilco [1933] VLR 180, considered. Alice Springs Town Council v Mpweteyerre Aboriginal Corporation and Others (1997) 115 NTR 25; Apollo Sh…
Hutchens v City of Holdfast Bay
[2007] SASC 238
Citation 37
(Para 13)
…aution even when interpreting a statute: Houssein v Under Secretary, Department of Industrial Relations and Technology (NSW) (1982) 148 CLR 88 at 94; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 250. In the latter decision the High Court said: It has often been said that the expressio unius maxim is one that should be applied w…
Legal Practitioners Conduct Board v Kerin
[2006] SASC 393
Citation 38
(Para 20)
…a practitioner.[8] [6] Law Society (SA) v Murphy (1999) 201 LSJS 456 at 460-461. [7] Bar Association (NSW) v Evatt (1968) 117 CLR 177 at 183-184; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 250-251. [8] Ziems v Prothonotary of Supreme Court (NSW) (1957) 97 CLR 279 and Re B [1986] VR 695 at 705.…
Ranbaxy Australia Pty Ltd v Warner-Lambert Co LLC (No 2)
[2006] FCA 1787
Citation 39
…t Company [2006] EWCA 876 considered Houssein v Under Secretary, Department of Industrial Relations and Technology (NSW) (1982) 148 CLR 88 cited Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 cited Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v FH Faulding and Co Limited (2000) 97 FCR 524 explained FAI Traders Insurance Co Ltd v Savoy Plaza Pty Ltd…
Jackson (previously known as Subramaniam) v Legal Practitioners Admission Board
[2006] NSWSC 1338
Citation 40
…ners (No. 2) [2005] VSC 332 Board of Examiners v XY [2006] VSCA 190 The Queen v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13 Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 Gersten v Law Society of NSW (2002) 56 NSWLR 16 Skerritt v Legal Practice Board of WA [2004] WASCA 28 Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (Co…
Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Eddy
[2006] FCA 254
Citation 41
(Para 22)
…tion on the one hand and the Bar Council on the other was the subject of observation in the joint judgment of Deane, Dawson, Toohey and Gaudron JJ in Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 248: ‘The Bar Association is a company limited by guarantee. Its articles of association provide for “a Council of the Association” [A…
Wang Kin John Cheng v Pharmacy Board of New South Wales
[2005] NSWSC 1130
Citation 42
…(1993) 2 TasR 90 Regina v Frederick Westley [2004] NSWCCA 192 Stollznow v Calvert (1980) 2 NSWLR 479 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 PARTIES: Wang Kin John Cheng - plaintiff Pharmacy Board of New South Wales – first defendant Health Care Complaints Commission – second defendant FIL…
Re Hoffman
[2004] WASCA 238
Citation 43
…f court, so long as it can do so without contravening any such provision: see Taylor v Attorney-General [1975] 2 NZLR 675 at 680, 687-8 and 692-3; cf Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 106 ALR 624; 66 ALJR 360 at 364. Hamilton v Oades provides an example of the denial of any entitlement of a court to rely upon its inherent jurisdict…
Law Society of Tasmania v Schouten
[2003] TASSC 143
Citation 44
(Para 1)
…s exercisable in the public interest and for the protection of the public. See Weaver v Law Society of New South Wales (1979) 142 CLR 201, 207, and Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239, 250-1; Smith v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256, 270. These principles have been consistently applied by this Court. See McCarthy v…
Law Society of New South Wales v Ross
[2003] NSWADT 204
Citation 45
…The Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of N.S.W. (1957) 97 CLR 279, at pp 286, 28; Clyne v. N.S.W. Bar Association (1960) 104 CLR 186, at pp 201-202; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 per Deane, Dawson, Toohey and Garudron JJ at 251; Clyne v New South Wales Bar Association (1960) 104 CLR at 201-2; New South Wales Bar As…
Barwick v Law Society of New South Wales (No. 2) (LSD)
[2003] NSWADTAP 4
Citation 46
…sciplinary Tribunal [1988] VR 757 O’Reilly v Law Society of NSW (1988) 24 NSWLR at 210 Smith v New South Wales Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 257 Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 Bannister v Walton (1993) 30 NSWLR 699 Gad v Health Care Complaints Commission [2002] NSWCA 111 Coe v NSW Bar Association [2000] NSWCA 13 Sab…
Gersten v The Law Society
[2002] NSWCA 344
Citation 47
…v Evatt (1968) 117 CLR 177 Harvey v The Law Society of New South Wales (1975) 49 ALJR 362 Weaver v Law Society of New South Wales (1979) 142 CLR 201 Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 Smith v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256 McCarthy v Law Society of New South Wales (1997) 43 NSWLR 42 DECISION: Leave to appeal gra…
Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
[2002] HCA 49
Citation 48
(Para 17)
…9; Riley v The Commonwealth (1985) 159 CLR 1; O'Sullivan v Farrer (1989) 168 CLR 210; Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239.…
Professional Standards Board for Patent and Trade Marks Attorneys and Patent and Trade Marks Attorneys Disciplinary Tribunal
[2002] AATA 728
Citation 49
(Para 2)
…uct, the Court acts in the public interest, and not with a view to punishment: New South Wales Bar Association v Evatt (1968) 117 CLR 177 at 183-184; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 250-251. The Court is concerned to protect the public, not to punish a practitioner who has done wrong, although of course the removal…
Law Society of South Australia v Rodda
[2002] SASC 274
Citation 50
(Para 20)
…t, the Court acts in the public interest, and not with a view to punishment: New South Wales Bar Association v Evatt (1968) 117 CLR 177 at 183-184; Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 at 250-251. The Court is concerned to protect the public, not to punish a practitioner who has done wrong, although of course the removal o…