Re Octaviar Ltd (No 8)

Case [2009] QSC 202


SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Re Octaviar Ltd (No 8) [2009] QSC 202

PARTIES:

THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF QUEENSLAND

(Applicant)

v

OCTAVIAR LTD (SUBJECT TO A DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) ACN 107 863 436

FORTRESS CREDIT CORPORATION (AUSTRALIA) II PTY LTD AND S J PARBERY AND A M SIMS AS RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS OF OCTAVIAR LTD (SUBJECT TO A DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) ACN 114 624 958

OPI PACIFIC FINANCE PTY LTD

OCTAVIAR INVESTMENT HOLDINGS NO. 3 PTY LTD and SUNLEISURE GROUP PTY LTD

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

WELLINGTON CAPITAL LTD AS RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OF THE PREMIUM INCOME FUND

CHALLENGER MANAGED INVESTMENTS LIMITED AS RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OF THE CHALLENGER HIGH YIELD FUND

(Respondents)

THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF QUEENSLAND

(Applicant)

v

OCTAVIAR ADMINISTRATION PTY LTD (SUBJECT TO A DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) ACN 101 069 390

FORTRESS CREDIT CORPORATION (AUSTRALIA) II PTY LTD AND S J PARBERY AND A M SIMS AS RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS OF OCTAVIAR LTD (SUBJECT TO A DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) ACN 107 863 436

OPI PACIFIC FINANCE PTY LTD

OCTAVIAR INVESTMENT HOLDINGS NO. 3 PTY LTD and SUNLEISURE GROUP PTY LTD

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

WELLINGTON CAPITAL LTD AS RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OF THE PREMIUM INCOME FUND

CHALLENGER MANAGED INVESTMENTS LIMITED AS RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OF THE CHALLENGER HIGH YIELD FUND

(Respondents)

FORTRESS CORPORATION (AUSTRALIA) II PTY LIMITED ACN 114 624 958

(Applicant)

v

OCTAVIAR LIMITED (SUBJECT TO A DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) ACN 107 863 436

JOHN LETHBRIDGE GREIG AND NICHOLAS HARWOOD IN THEIR CAPACITY AS DEED ADMINISTRATORS OF OCTAVIAR LIMITED (SUBJECT TO A DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) ACN 107 863 436

(Respondents)

FILE NO/S:

BS 1848 of 2009
BS 1850 of 2009
BS 3650 of 2009

DIVISION:

Trial Division

PROCEEDING:

Application

ORIGINATING COURT:

Supreme Court at Brisbane

DELIVERED ON:

31 July 2009

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

5-8 May 2009, 11-13 May 2009

JUDGE:

McMurdo J

ORDER:

In BS 1848/09, it is ordered that:

1.   Part 5.3A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) operate in relation to Octaviar Limited (Administrators Appointed) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) so that s 446B and reg 5.3A.07 do not operate with any effect in relation to the company.

2.   Pursuant to s 445D of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Deed of Company Arrangement between that company, Fortress Credit Corporation (Australia) II Pty Limited, John Lethbridge Greig and Nicholas Harwood, and Stephen James Parbery and Anthony Milton Sims be terminated.

3.   John Lethbridge Greig and Nicholas Harwood be appointed as provisional liquidators until further order.

In BS 1850/09, it is ordered that:

1.   Pursuant to s 445D of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Deed of Company Arrangement between Octaviar Administration Pty Limited (Administrators Appointed), and John Lethbridge Greig and Nicholas Harwood be terminated.

2.   John Lethbridge Greig and Nicholas Harwood be appointed as liquidators until further order.

In BS 3650/09, it is ordered that the Application be dismissed.

CATCHWORDS:

CORPORATIONS – VOLUNTARY…

Continue reading Re Octaviar Ltd (No 8)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Re Octaviar Ltd (No 8) [2009] QSC 202
Case
[2009] QSC 202
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Re Octaviar Ltd (No 8), the Court was tasked with various issues surrounding the voluntary administration, deed of company arrangement, and liquidation of Octaviar Limited, a company in financial distress. The court examined whether the deed of company arrangement should be terminated, the effect of the Commissioner of Taxation's statutory charge on the assets, and the impact of part payments made by a guarantor on the debtor's debt. Additionally, the court considered the solvency of the group, the public interest in liquidation, and the registration and extension of charges under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

The court found that the deed of company arrangement was contrary to the interests of the creditors as a whole, as there was a reasonable prospect of recovering significant funds from preference claims and uncommercial transactions only in the event of liquidation. The court also found that the representations made to creditors by the administrators prior to the execution of the deed of company arrangement were misleading, as they did not accurately reflect the potential returns from liquidation. Furthermore, the court determined that the Commissioner of Taxation's statutory charge was not affected by the crystallisation of the charge, and that part payments made by the guarantor did not affect the state of the account between the creditor and debtor.

The court also found that there was a serious question to be tried as to the group's insolvency, as the group needed $43 million to meet its commitments and there was evidence that it was unlikely to raise the necessary capital. The court further found that it was appropriate to have regard to the public interest in liquidation in exercising the discretionary power to terminate the deed of company arrangement. The court also held that the power under s 447A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to make orders about "how this Part is to operate" includes not only the sections within the Part but also the regulations made under them.

In terms of the registration and extension of charges, the court found that it retains the power to extend time under s 266(4) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) despite the intervention of a winding up or administration. The court also found that ignorance or misunderstanding of the law may amount to "inadvertence" under s 266(4) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), and that it is just and equitable to grant relief by way of an extension if there would be some prejudice to the chargee if the extension were not granted.

Finally, the court found that s 451C of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) does not preserve or extinguish the position under the general law, and that a transaction that is already void is "liable to be set aside in a winding up." The court also found that a condition seeking to ensure that any extension of time granted to a chargee be without prejudice to the creditor's rights should not be imposed if the creditor's rights are not prejudiced in any case.

The court ordered that Part 5.3A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) operate in relation to Octaviar Limited so that s 446B and reg 5.3A.07 do not operate with any effect in relation to the company. The court also terminated the Deed of Company Arrangement between Octaviar Limited and certain parties, and appointed provisional liquidators and liquidators to the company. Finally, the court dismissed an application.

Orders

Orders of the court

In BS 1848/09, it is ordered that:

1. Part 5.3A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) operate in relation to Octaviar Limited (Administrators Appointed) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) so that s 446B and reg 5.3A.07 do not operate with any effect in relation to the company.

2. Pursuant to s 445D of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Deed of Company Arrangement between that company, Fortress Credit Corporation (Australia) II Pty Limited, John Lethbridge Greig and Nicholas Harwood, and Stephen James Parbery and Anthony Milton Sims be terminated.

3. John Lethbridge Greig and Nicholas Harwood be appointed as provisional liquidators until further order.

In BS 1850/09, it is ordered that:

1. Pursuant to s 445D of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Deed of Company Arrangement between Octaviar Administration Pty Limited (Administrators Appointed), and John Lethbridge Greig and Nicholas Harwood be terminated.

2. John Lethbridge Greig and Nicholas Harwood be appointed as liquidators until further order.

In BS 3650/09, it is ordered that the Application be dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.