Legal Research
Cases
Owners Corporation PS419696X v Goh

Owners Corporation PS419696X v Goh

Case [2021] VSC 126

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Owners Corporation PS419696X v Goh [2021] VSC 126
Case: [2021] VSC 126
Decision Date: 24 March 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Owners Corporation PS419696X v Goh [2021] VSC 126

Most Recent Citation

Save Wallum Incorporated v Clarence Property Corporation Limited (No 4) [2025] FCA 389

Cases Citing This Decision

Save Wallum Incorporated v Clarence Property Corporation Limited (No 4) [2025] FCA 389
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…non-compliance with r 23.13 of the FCR, GPN-EXPT and the Code of Conduct went only to weight); Owners Corporation PS419696X v Goh (2021) 63 VR 497; [2021] VSC 126 at [74]-[77] (Garde J) (holding that, in light of Ananda Marga and Rush , the submission that an expert’s evidence should not be received because of hi…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 5) [2018] FCA 1622
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…partial.[69] [69](2019) 59 VR 288, [57]–[60]; ASIC v Rich (2005) 190 FLR 242, 300 [242]; 324-5 [348]–[349]; Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 5) [2018] FCA 1622, [8]-[9], [36] (Wigney J) (‘ Rush ’); Ananda Marga Pracaraka Samagha Ltd v Tomar (No 4) (2012) 202 FCR 564, 570 [35] (Dodds-Streeton J) (‘ Ananda ’).…
Martin v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 893
Citation 2

…ion being caused by that factor in that way.[39] [39] Isbester (n 33), 155–6 [59], cited in Martin v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 893, [33] (Lee J).…
Neil v Legal Profession Complaints Committee [No 2] [2017] WASCA 158
Citation 3 (Para 1)

…connection between the past association and the alleged deviation from the course of deciding the appeals on their legal and factual merits.[98] [97][2017] WASCA 158, [3]. [98]Ibid [8].…
Bondelmonte and Bondelmonte (No 2) [2016] FamCA 526
Citation 4 (Para 1)

…reasonably apprehend that the judge might not bring an impartial mind to the resolution of the question the judge is required to decide’.[31] [31](2000) 205 CLR 337, 344 [6] (Glesson CJ, McHugh, Gummow and Hayne JJ) (‘ Ebner ’).…
Waterhouse v Independent Commission Against Corruption (No 3) [2016] NSWCA 134
Citation 5 (Para 1)

…ior to his appointment as a judge, and professional associations with another judge who had represented the plaintiff’s family in the past.[91] [91][2016] NSWCA 134.…
Isbester v Knox City Council [2015] HCA 20
Citation 6 (Para 1)

…hat interest and the feared deviation from the course of deciding the case on its merits.[33] [32]Ibid 345 [8]. [33] Isbester v Knox City Council (2015) 255 CLR 135, 146 [21] (Kiefel, Bell, Keane and Nettle JJ) (‘ Isbester ’), citing Ebner (n 31) 345 [8].…
Permanent Custodians Ltd v Geagea [2013] NSWSC 693
Citation 7 (Para 1)

…or counsel.[94] There was no domestic relationship or personal friendship, or impediment to the unprejudiced resolution of the proceeding.[95] [92][2013] NSWSC 693. [93]Ibid [20]. [94]Ibid [21]. [95]Ibid [24].…
Ananda Marga Pracaraka Samagha Ltd v Tomar (No 4) [2012] FCA 385
Citation 8 (Para 1)

…Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 5) [2018] FCA 1622, [8]-[9], [36] (Wigney J) (‘ Rush ’); Ananda Marga Pracaraka Samagha Ltd v Tomar (No 4) (2012) 202 FCR 564, 570 [35] (Dodds-Streeton J) (‘ Ananda ’).…
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2005] NSWCA 152
Citation 9 (Para 1)

…noted that there was no requirement for the evidence of an expert to be independent or impartial.[69] [69](2019) 59 VR 288, [57]–[60]; ASIC v Rich (2005) 190 FLR 242, 300 [242]; 324-5 [348]–[349]; Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 5) [2018] FCA 1622, [8]-[9], [36] (Wigney J) (‘ Rush ’); Ananda Marga Pracaraka Samag…
In the matter of an application by the Chief Commissioner of Police (Vic) [2005] HCA 18
Citation 10 (Para 1)

…sions were made and that leave to do so would be granted only in very exceptional circumstances.[101] [100](2003) 141 A Crim R 216, 286 [204]. [101](2005) 79 ALJR 881, 885 [22].…
SZAYJ v Minister for Immigration [2004] FMCA 918
Citation 11 (Para 1)

…is from the judicial paradigm.[35] [35]Ibid 146 [22], citing Ebner (n 31) 343-4 [4]; Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507, 563 [181] (Hayne J).…
Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT) [2003] HCA 28
Citation 12

…[102](1981) 147 CLR 246, 258, cited in Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT) (2003) 214 CLR 318, 330 [30]. See also R v Zhan Yu Zhong [2003] VSCA 56, [2]–[4].…
R v Zhan Yu Zhong [2003] VSCA 56
Citation 13

…[102](1981) 147 CLR 246, 258, cited in Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT) (2003) 214 CLR 318, 330 [30]. See also R v Zhan Yu Zhong [2003] VSCA 56, [2]–[4].…
Temwell Pty Ltd v DKGR Holdings Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 345
Citation 14 (Para 1)

…itor who was likely to be a witness. The judge had a long standing relationship with the solicitor, and recused himself from the trial.[76] [75][2003] FCA 345 (Merkel J). [76]Ibid.…
Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy [2002] HCA 51
Citation 15 (Para 1)

…mote’.[38] [36] Isbester (n 33), 146 [23], citing Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550, 612 (Brennan J). [37]Ibid, citing Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (2002) 210 CLR 438, 459 [68] (McHugh J); Stollery v Greyhound Racing Control Board (1972) 128 CLR 509, 519 (Barwick CJ). [38] Ebner (n 31) 345 [7].…
Minister for Immigration And Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17
Citation 16 (Para 1)

…the curial process is less apposite the greater divergence there is from the judicial paradigm.[35] [35]Ibid 146 [22], citing Ebner (n 31) 343-4 [4]; Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507, 563 [181] (Hayne J).…
Slade v Gea [2001] NSWSC 38
Citation 17

…[66][2001] NSWSC 38, [86] (‘ Slade ’).…
Fried v National Australia Bank Ltd [2000] FCA 787
Citation 18 (Para 1)

…ccountant carried out his professional responsibilities which might subconsciously influence his assessment of the accountant’s evidence.[78] [77][2000] FCA 787 (Weinberg J). [78]Ibid.…
Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal [1990] HCA 31
Citation 19 (Para 1)

…[55] The statutory requirement that a tribunal perform the functions assigned to it prevails over and displaces the rules of natural justice.[56] [55](1990) 170 CLR 70, 88 (‘ Laws ’). [56]Ibid 89.…
Vakauta v Kelly [1989] HCA 44
Citation 20 (Para 1)

…minded lay observer a reasonable apprehension that the judge might not bring an unprejudiced mind to the resolution of the matter before him.[87] [86](1989) 167 CLR 568. [87]Ibid.…
Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81
Citation 21 (Para 1)

…tances leading to the decision.[37] The possibility of bias must be ‘real and not remote’.[38] [36] Isbester (n 33), 146 [23], citing Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550, 612 (Brennan J). [37]Ibid, citing Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (2002) 210 CLR 438, 459 [68] (McHugh J); Stollery v Greyhound Racing Control Board (1972…
Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association [1983] HCA 17
Citation 22 (Para 1)

…ction Canal (1852) 3 HLC 759, 787–788; Dickason v Edwards (1910) 10 CLR 243, 259 (Isaacs J); Builders’ Registration Board (Queensland) v Rauber (1983) 57 ALJR 376, 385–386, 392 (Brennan and Deane JJ).…
Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd (No 1) [1981] HCA 20
Citation 23

…[102](1981) 147 CLR 246, 258, cited in Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT) (2003) 214 CLR 318, 330 [30]. See also R v Zhan Yu Zhong [2003] VSCA 56, [2]–[4].…
Stollery v Greyhound Racing Control Board [1972] HCA 53
Citation 24 (Para 1)

…12 (Brennan J). [37]Ibid, citing Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (2002) 210 CLR 438, 459 [68] (McHugh J); Stollery v Greyhound Racing Control Board (1972) 128 CLR 509, 519 (Barwick CJ). [38] Ebner (n 31) 345 [7].…
Dickason v Edwards [1910] HCA 7
Citation 25 (Para 1)

…interest is available to sit.[57] [57]Ibid 88–9, citing Dimes v Proprietors of Grand Junction Canal (1852) 3 HLC 759, 787–788; Dickason v Edwards (1910) 10 CLR 243, 259 (Isaacs J); Builders’ Registration Board (Queensland) v Rauber (1983) 57 ALJR 376, 385–386, 392 (Brennan and Deane JJ).…
Zaitsev v Building Appeals Board [2019] VSC 364
Citation 26 (Para 1)

…ard’s predecessor, the Building Referees Board.[53] [48]Act sch 3 cl 15(3)(a). [49]Ibid cl 15(3)(b). See Zaitsev v Building Appeals Board [2019] VSC 364, 14 [47] (Quigley J). [50]Act sch 3 cls 15(3)(c), (d). See Valorne Pty Ltd v Building Appeals Board [2013] VSC 641, 12 [18] (Daly AsJ); You v Thomas [2014] VSC 2…
You v Thomas [2014] VSC 255
Citation 27 (Para 1)

…uigley J). [50]Act sch 3 cls 15(3)(c), (d). See Valorne Pty Ltd v Building Appeals Board [2013] VSC 641, 12 [18] (Daly AsJ); You v Thomas [2014] VSC 255, 5 [14]–[17] (McMillan J); Anstee & Calnan v Eyers [2011] VSC 79, 5 [15], 16-18 [56]–[64] (Osborn J). [51]Act sch 3 cl 15(3)(e). [52]Ibid cl 15(3)(f). [53]Victor…
Valorne Pty Ltd v Building Appeals Board [2013] VSC 641
Citation 28 (Para 1)

…Building Appeals Board [2019] VSC 364, 14 [47] (Quigley J). [50]Act sch 3 cls 15(3)(c), (d). See Valorne Pty Ltd v Building Appeals Board [2013] VSC 641, 12 [18] (Daly AsJ); You v Thomas [2014] VSC 255, 5 [14]–[17] (McMillan J); Anstee & Calnan v Eyers [2011] VSC 79, 5 [15], 16-18 [56]–[64] (Osborn J). [51]Act sc…
Anstee & Calnan v Eyers [2011] VSC 79
Citation 29 (Para 1)

…ilding Appeals Board [2013] VSC 641, 12 [18] (Daly AsJ); You v Thomas [2014] VSC 255, 5 [14]–[17] (McMillan J); Anstee & Calnan v Eyers [2011] VSC 79, 5 [15], 16-18 [56]–[64] (Osborn J). [51]Act sch 3 cl 15(3)(e). [52]Ibid cl 15(3)(f). [53]Victoria, Parliamentary Debates , Assembly, 11 November 1993, 1690 (Rober…
Metropolitan Fire and Emergency Services Board v Churchill [1998] VSC 51
Citation 30 (Para 1)

…y Services Board v Churchill , where Gillard J held that the doctrine applied to a disciplinary hearing concerning a firefighter’s conduct.[54] [54][1998] VSC 51.…

AI Chat coming soon