Carey v Freehills
Case
•
[2013] FCA 954
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Carey v Freehills [2013] FCA 954
[2013] FCA 954
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Federal Court of Australia dismissed the cross-claim brought by Norman Phillip Carey and others against Freehills, a law firm, and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). The cross-claimants alleged that the law firm was negligent and engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct, which resulted in the loss of the opportunity to float the Westpoint Group and the loss of value of their shareholding in the companies comprising the Westpoint Group. The court found that the cross-claimants failed to establish the essential elements of their claims, including duty of care, reliance, and causation. Kenny J concluded that the claims against Freehills were dismissed, and if the parties did not submit written submissions on costs within 10 days of the delivery of judgment, the cross-claimants would be ordered to pay the first cross-respondent's costs of and incidental to the cross-claim.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Commercial Law
-
Corporate Law & Governance
Legal Concepts
-
Contract Formation
-
Breach of Contract
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Misleading or Deceptive Conduct
-
Negligence
-
Causation
-
Judicial Review
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Carey v Freehills [2013] FCA 954
Most Recent Citation
Lighthouse Corporation (Capital) Pty Ltd v One76 Pty Ltd [2024] VSC 623
Cases Citing This Decision
102
David Securities Pty Ltd & Ors v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
[1991] HCATrans 275
Dirkis v Public Trustee and Guardian & Ors (Appeal)
[2023] ACAT 49
Firstmac Ltd v Hunt & Hunt (a firm)
[2018] QSC 258
Cases Cited
50
Statutory Material Cited
0