Legal Research
Cases
Derry v Peek

Derry v Peek

Case [1889] UKHL 1

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is coming soon as we're improving how the document is presented.

Details

Case: [1889] UKHL 1
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Most Recent Citation

Cases Citing This Decision

229

Cavallaro and Tax Practitioners Board (Taxation) [2025] ARTA 2028
Citation 1 (Para 7)

…allegation of dishonesty against a professional person should be determined by reference to well-established principles stated by Lord Herschell in Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 at 374, i.e., that a statement will only be dishonest if it is made “(1) knowingly, or (2) without belief in its truth, or (3) recklessl…
Vanifatova v Wang [2025] NZHC 1532
Citation 2

…985] 2 NZLR 569 (HC). 13 Andrew Tettenborn (ed) Clerk & Lindsell on Torts (24th ed, Thomson Reuters, London, 2023) at [17-01] (footnotes omitted). 14 Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 (HL) at 374 per Lord Hershell. 15 Bradford Third Equitable Benefit Building Society v Borders [1941] 2 All ER 205 (HL) at 211 per Visc…
Lal v Royal Australasian College of Physicians [2025] FCA 348
Citation 3 (Para 25)

…408C(1)(d) of the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) . The fraudulent conduct is further supported by the principles established in Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337, where it was held that a party who knowingly or recklessly makes false representations, intending another party to rely on them, is liable for deceit. Additi…
HBSY Pty Ltd v Lewis (No 2) [2025] FCAFC 44
Citation 4

…HCA 64; 226 CLR 1 Cumming v Austin (1903) 28 VLR 622 Doering v Doering (1889) 42 Ch D 203 Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 377 Emma Silver Mining Company v Grant (1880) 17 Ch D 122 Gray v Guardian Trust Australia [2002] NSWSC 1218 HBSY Pty Ltd v Lewis [2023] FCAFC 109; 298 FCR 303 HBSY v Lewis [2024] HCA 35; 98 ALJR 121…
ACN 117 641 004 Pty Ltd (in liq) v S&P Global, Inc (No 4) [2025] FCA 72
Citation 5 (Para 5)

…presentation with the knowledge that it was false, or that the defendant was reckless or careless as to whether the representation was false or not ( Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 at 374 per Lord Herschell); thirdly, that the defendant made the representation with the intention that it be relied upon by the plain…
Smith v The Legal Contribution Trust [2024] WASC 454
Citation 6

…Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; 60 CLR 336 Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 Helby v Council for the Law Society (NSW) [2013] NSWSC 1938 Legal Services Board v Gillespie [2013] HCA 35; (2013) 249 CLR 493 Tolhurst Druce & Emmerson v Maryvell Investment Pty Ltd (in liq) [2007] VSC 271…
Harper v Harper [2024] NSWSC 1540
Citation 7

…) 151 CLR 447; [1983] HCA 14 Crouch v Hooper (1852) 16 Beav 182; 51 ER 747 Derry v Peek [1889] UKHL 1; (1889) 14 App Cas 337 Effem Foods Pty Ltd v Lake Cumbeline Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 15; (1999) 161 ALR 599 Et-China.com International Holdings Ltd v Cheung [2021] NSWCA 24; (2021) 388 ALR 128 Forrest v Australian Sec…
Carter v Chubb Insurance Australia Ltd [2024] FCA 1312
Citation 8

…2005] Ch 119 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu v Cridlands Pty Ltd (2003) 134 FCR 474; [2003] FCA 1413 Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 Eden v Risdale’s Railway Lamp & Lighting Co (1889) 23 QBD 368 FAI Insurance Co Ltd v McSweeney (1999) 10 ANZ Ins Cas 61-443 Freeman & Lockyer (a firm) v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Lt…
Wilcox v Chapple [2024] NSWSC 1394
Citation 9

…kenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1; [2005] HCA 12 Daley v Donaldson [2022] NSWCA 96 Derry v Peek [1889] UKHL 1 Douglas v Mikhael [2024] NSWCA 89 Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd v Hogg (1995) 64 SASR 450 Fidelitas Shipping Co Ltd v V/O Exportchleb [1966] 1 QB 630 Field v Commissioner for Railways (NSW…
Thompson v Lane [2024] FCA 1234
Citation 10 (Para 11)

…d QUD86 of 2022, including that there was not $1,332,934 of valid Proof of Debt Claims, noting that; Lord Herschell LC defined “fraud” in Derry v Peek (1889) 14 AC 33 (at p 374) as; “a false statement of fact which is made by one party to a transaction to the other knowingly, or without belief in its truth, or reckles…
Diamantidis Group Pty Ltd Trading as Ray White St Marys v The Agarwal Group Real Estate Pty Limited [2024] NSWDC 354
Citation 11

…was great confusion as to the meaning of “fraud” at common law and in equity, which became acute following its apparent reconciliation in Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337, at least until the position in equity was clarified by Nocton v Lord Ashburton [1914] AC 932. Professor Hanbury said that common law and equity p…
Haley v Laing O'Rourke Australia Management Services Pty Ltd (No 5) [2024] FedCFamC2G 286
Citation 12 (Para 11)

…ill be held to be fraudulently made in the same manner as any other representation of fact may be held to have been fraudulently made.[34] [33] Derry v Peek (1889) LR 14 App Cas 337, at page 374 (Lord Herschell) [34] Edgington v Fitzmaurice (1885) 29 Ch D 459, at page 483: “A misrepresentation as to the state of a man…
Smith v State of Queensland (Queensland Health) & Webb [2024] QIRC 18
Citation 13 (Para 1)

…must have been made carelessly or with indifference as to its truth.[16] This is not a matter I need to address in hearing this application. [16] Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337, 374 cited in Fenwick v World of Maths [2012] FMCA 131, [51].…
BETWEEN ANDREW JOHN MCKAY and REES GRAHAM LOGAN as liquidators of Aisleworx Limited (in Liquidation) First plaintiffs AND AISLEWORX LIMITED (in Liquidation) Second plaintiff AND PGL ADMIN LIMITED Third plaintiff... [2023] NZHC 3877
Citation 14

…76 See [85] above. 77 “A horse, a horse! My kingdom for a horse!”: William Shakespeare Richard III , act 4, sc 5. 78 Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 (HL) at 374, approved in Amaltal Corp Ltd v Maruha (NZ) Corp Ltd [2007] 1 NZLR 608 (CA) at [48] (not disturbed on further appeal: Maruha Corporation v Amaltal Corporat…
Doerr v Gardiner [2023] QCA 160
Citation 15

…Sales v Ingrilli (2002) 212 CLR 338; [2002] HCA 52, cited Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337; [1889] UKHL 1, cited Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472; [1993] HCA 78, cited Elford v FAI General Insurance Co Ltd [1994] 1 Qd R 258; [1992] QCA 41, cited Federal Commissioner of Taxat…
Richmond Valley Council v JLT Risk Solutions Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1761
Citation 16

…CLR 178; [1984] HCA 36 CSR Ltd v Adecco (Australia) Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 121 Dansar Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council (2014) 89 NSWLR 1; [2014] NSWCA 364 Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 DSHE Holdings Ltd (receivers and managers appointed) (in liq) v Potts; HSBC Bank Ltd v Abboud; Potts v National Australia Bank Ltd [20…
McEntee v SJ Berry [2022] SASCA 133
Citation 17 (Para 11)

…ills Region Waste Management Authority (No 3) [2019] SASC 192 at [130]‑[131]. [72] Krakowski v Eurolynx (1995) 183 CLR 563 at 579-580; citing Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 at 374. See also Smith v Chadwick (1884) 9 App Cas 187 at 201; The Crown v McNeil (1922) 31 CLR 76 at 104.…
Wan v Ji [2022] NSWDC 269
Citation 18

…ONTRACT – enforceability of alleged guarantee of capital losses in an investment scheme Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law Cases Cited: Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cos 337; [1889] UKHL 1 In the matter of Caernarvon Canobolas Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2022] NSWSC 382 Lumbers v W Cook Builders Pty Ltd (In Liq) (2008) 232…
HBSY Pty Ltd v Lewis [2022] NSWSC 841
Citation 19

…hat a false representation has been made (1) knowingly, or (2) without belief in its truth, or (3) recklessly, careless whether it be true or false": Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 at 374. The contrast with equity was explained by Viscount Haldane LC in Nocton v Lord Ashburton [1914] AC 932 at 953-954: "[i]n Chanc…
Irlam v Byrnes [2022] NSWCA 81
Citation 20

…inn v Leathem [1901] AC 495 at 537 per Lord Lindley. For the tort of deceit (which can be committed either intentionally or recklessly: Derry v Peek (1888) 14 App Cas 337), contributory negligence of a gullible plaintiff, or of a plaintiff who negligently failed to check the accuracy of the statement made, is not a de…
Calabro and Migration Agents Registration Authority (Migration) [2022] AATA 1378
Citation 21 (Para 22)

…The respondent contends that by advising the Department of the proposed regional address, the applicant provided a statement in support of an application where he was recklessly indifferent as to whether the statement was misleading or inaccurate. In Kaur the Full Court of the Federal Court observed…
Turner v O'Bryan-Turner [2022] NSWCA 23
Citation 22

…ly, there was great confusion as to the meaning of "fraud" at common law and in equity, which became acute following its apparent reconciliation in Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337, at least until the position in equity was clarified by Nocton v Lord Ashburton [1914] AC 932. Professor Hanbury said that common law an…
Compass Marinas Australia Pty Ltd v State of Queensland [2021] QCA 293
Citation 23

…2010) 78 NSWLR 483; [2010] NSWCA 84, considered Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337; [1889] UKHL 1, considered Filmana Pty Ltd v Tynan [2013] QCA 256, cited George 218 Pty Ltd v Bank of Queensland Limited (No 2) (2016) 313 FLR 287; [2016] WASCA 182, cited Low v Bouverie [1891] 3 Ch 82; [1891] UKLawRpCh 106, consi…
Adams v Price [2021] WADC 130
Citation 24 (Para 4)

…(and therefore Mr and Mrs Price vicariously) knew it to be false or untrue or was recklessly careless as to whether it was true or false.[161] [160] Derry v Peek (1889) 4 AC 337. [161] Derry v Peek .…
Routhan v PGG Wrightson Real Estate Ltd [2021] NZHC 3585
Citation 25

…25 At [47]. 26 Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 (HL) at 374. 27 Amaltal Corporation Ltd v Maruha Corp , above n 24, at [49]–[50].…
Stuart v Rabobank Australia Ltd [2021] FCA 1388
Citation 26

…har (2011) 243 CLR 588; [2011] HCA 21 Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337; [1886-90] All ER Rep 1 Domain Names Australia Pty Ltd v .au Domain Administration Ltd (2004) 139 FCR 215; [2004] FCAFC 247 Dorfler v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (1991) 103 ALR 699; [1991] FCA 545 Doyle v Olby (Ironmongers) Lt…
Wassell v Ken Carr Bobcat & Tipper Hire Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1415
Citation 27

…Trustees Victoria Ltd [2007] NSWSC 694; (2007) 13 BPR 24,675 Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 Farrand v Yorkshire Banking Company (1888) 40 Ch D 182 Heid v Reliance Finance Corporation Pty Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 326 Joslyn v Berryman (2003) 214 CLR 552; [2003] HCA 34 Kumar v Registrar-General of New South Wales [2021]…
Shabor Ltd v Graham [2021] NZCA 448
Citation 28 (Para 2)

…lessly, careless whether it was true or false.[96] It was factor, he said, that went against treating cl 27.3 as conclusive between the parties. [96] Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 (HL) at 374 per Lord Herschell, followed in New Zealand in Amaltal Corp Ltd v Maruha Corp [2007] 1 NZLR 608 (CA) at [48].…
Modra v The Queen [2021] SASCA 88
Citation 29 (Para 6)

…15] R v Schofield [1978] 1 WLR 979 (Lloyd J, delivering the reasons of the Court). [16] Amann Aviation v Commonwealth (1991) 174 CLR 64. [17] Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337; Nocton v Lord Ashburton [1914] AC 932; Mutual Life & Citizens Assurance Co Ltd v Evatt (1968) 122 CLR 556.…
G&S Engineering Services Pty Ltd v MACH Energy Australia Pty Ltd (No 4) [2021] NSWSC 1052
Citation 30 (Para 36)

…is an allegation of fraud. The making of a representation that is false, with reckless indifference whether it is true or false, is common law fraud: Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 at 374; Forrest v Australian Securities and Investment Commission (2012) 247 CLR 486; [2012] HCA 39 at [22] (French CJ, Gummow, Hayne,…
Sentinel Springwood Retail Pty Ltd v Tomlinson [2021] QDC 159
Citation 31

…Derry v Peek (1889) LR 14 App Cas 337…
Kanjian Holdings No 1 Pty Ltd v Kanjian; Kanjian v Kanjian (No 3) [2021] NSWSC 839
Citation 32

…LR 731; [2005] NSWCA 110 Delaforce v Simpson-Cook (2010) 78 NSWLR 483 Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 DHJPM Pty Ltd v Blackthorn Resources Ltd (formerly called AIM Resources Ltd) (2011) 83 NSWLR 728; [2011] NSWCA 348 Dlakic by his tutor Dlakic v Vaughan [2018] NSWSC 1455 Dong v Song [2018] ACTSC 82 Doulaveras v Dah…
Bozic v Billis [2021] WASC 88 (S)
Citation 33 (Para 2)

…t a false representation has been made (1) knowingly, or (2) without belief in its truth, or (3) recklessly, careless whether it be true or false': Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 at 374. The contrast with equity was explained by Viscount Haldane LC in Nocton v Lord Ashburton [1914] AC 932 at 953-954: '[i]n Chancer…
Talacko v Talacko [2021] HCA 15
Citation 34 (Para 3)

…om common law " Derry v Peek fraud"[18]. [16] Talacko v Talacko [2015] VSC 287 at [69]-[75]. [17](1873) LR 6 HL 377 at 390. See also at 392-393. [18] Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337.…
Singh v Minister for Immigration [2021] FCCA 908
Citation 35

…for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 50 Commonwealth of Australia v Prygodicz [2020] FCA 1516 Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 F Hoffman La Roche & Co AG v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [1975] AC 295, 320; aff’d [1975] AC 329 Gill v Minister for Imm…
Cardillo v Moreton Bay Trailer Boat Club Incorporated [2021] QDC 75
Citation 36 (Para 3)

…onable diligence have been discovered.[57] [55]Referring to the classic statement of the elements of the tort of deceit stated by Lord Herschell in Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 at 374. [56] Limitations of Action Act 1974 (Qld) s10 prescribes a 6-year limitation period for any action in tort. The limitation perio…
Compass Marinas Australia Pty Ltd v The State of Queensland; The State of Queensland v Compass Marinas Australia Pty Ltd [2020] QSC 375
Citation 37 (Para 21)

…ce NV (2013) 302 ALR 732, 744-5. [65] Magill (above) per Gleeson CJ at [17] citing Nocton v Lord Ashburton [1914] AC 932, 950-955 which in turn cited Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337.…
Lorenzato v Burwood Council [2020] NSWSC 1659
Citation 38

…2] NSWLEC 2; (2002) 118 LEGRA 41 Curtis v Harden Shire Council [2014] NSWCA 314 Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 Flight v Booth (1834) 1 Bing (NC) 370; (1834) 131 ER 1160 Hawthorn Corporation v Kannuluik [1906] AC 105 Gales Holdings Pty Limited v Tweed Shire Council [2013] NSWCA 382 Gartner v Kidman [1962] HCA 27; (…
1935052 (Migration) [2020] AATA 4663
Citation 39 (Para 13)

…e classical exposition by Lord Herschell in Derry v. Peek [1889] UKHL 1; (1889) 14 App. Cas. 337 at 374 shows, fraud can be proved by showing that a false statement has been made without belief in its truth or, “recklessly, careless whether it be true or false”. But as was said in the Assets Co., Ltd. case, the…
Al-Huda Pty Limited v Secretary, Department of Education, Skills and Employment [2020] FCA 1613
Citation 40 (Para 8)

…, or (2) without belief in its truth , or (3) recklessly, careless whether it be true or false" (The formulation is that of Lord Herschell in Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 at 374). But (3) is but an instance of (2) because, as Lord Herschell put it in Derry v Peek ((1889) 14 App Cas 337 at 374): “[O]ne who makes…
Raimo and Brogden [2020] FamCA 536
Citation 41

…Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Casa 337 Banditt v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 262 Thorne v Kennedy (2017) 263 CLR 85…
Heir v Minister for Immigration [2020] FCCA 1598
Citation 42 (Para 4)

…shorthand expressions to describe some kinds of cases of fraud. As the classical exposition by Lord Herschell in Derry v. Peek [1889] UKHL 1; (1889) 14 App. Cas. 337 at 374 shows, fraud can be proved by showing that a false statement has been made without belief in its truth or, “recklessly, careless whether it…
Foote v Coroner's Court of the Act [2020] ACTSC 141
Citation 43

…Attorney General of New South Wales & Anor [2012] NSWSC 1186 Country Energy v Deputy State Coroner Paul MacMahon & Anor [2010] NSWSC 943 Derry v Peek [1889] UKHL 1; (1880) 14 App Cas 337 Director-General, Dept of Community Services v Crombie (Unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Harrison M, 19 August 19…
Bao v Qu; Tian (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 588
Citation 44 (Para 33)

…ud means an act or omission done for an intentionally deceitful purpose or with reckless indifference as to the truth or falsity of a representation: Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337; [1886–90] All ER Rep 1. Proof of perjury by a witness is insufficient unless the plaintiff perpetrated the fraud by procuring the wit…
Katragadda v Minister for Immigration [2020] FCCA 723
Citation 45 (Para 5)

…shorthand expressions to describe some kinds of cases of fraud. As the classical exposition by Lord Herschell in Derry v. Peek [1889] UKHL 1; (1889) 14 App. Cas. 337 at 374 shows, fraud can be proved by showing that a false statement has been made without belief in its truth or, “recklessly, careless whether it…
JWR Productions Australia Pty Ltd v Duncan-Watt (No 2) [2020] FCA 236
Citation 46 (Para 29)

…Productions under the “Writers Assignment Agreement” was voidable by Mr Duncan-Watt, it having been procured by Mr Rockefeller’s fraud – see: Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337; Civil Service Co-operative Society of Victoria Ltd v Blyth (1914) 17 CLR 601 at 609 ‑ 610. Mr Duncan-Watt rescinded the assignment to JWR Pro…
KARLSSON & KARLSSON (No.2) [2020] FCCA 144
Citation 47 (Para 6)

…rved: The definition of “fraud'', both equitable and at common law, has been well settled since the celebrated definition of Lord Herschell L.C. in Derry v Peek (1889) 14 A.C. 337 at p. 374. The learned trial Judge restated that definition in the following terms: “Fraud in this context consists of a false statement of…
Almona Pty Ltd v Parklea Corporation Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1868
Citation 48

…onwealth Bank of Australia [2014] NSWCA 336; (2014) 313 ALR 665 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89; [2007] HCA 22 Farrar v Farrars Ltd (1888) 40 Ch D 395 Forsyth v Blundell (1973) 129 CLR 477; [1973] HCA 20 Frazer v Walker [1967] 1 AC 569 Friend v Mayer [1982] VR 941 Gerard Cassegrain & Co…
Symbolic Resources Pty Ltd v Burston [2019] QLC 39
Citation 49 (Para 1)

…to 22. [58] Derry v Peek (1889) LR 14 App Cas 337, 344. As there is no evidence from DES about its assessment-level decision, it is not possible for the Court to decide whether the answers considered above did, in fact, mislead it. However, they were apt to do so. It raises doubts about whether DES could or did proper…
D'Orsogna Limited v Zhang [2019] WADC 73
Citation 50 (Para 7)

…so in light of the submissions made to him on behalf of the appellant. Those submissions are consistent with the common law test for fraud set out in Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 and adopted by the High Court in Magill v Magill [2006] HCA 51; (2006) 226 CLR 551 [113]. Fraud is proved when it is shown that a fals…

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0

AI Chat coming soon