Yuill v Spedley Securities Limited (In Liquidation)

Case [1993] HCATrans 99


IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry

Sydney No S92 of 1992

B e t w e e n -

MR BRIAN RICHARD YUILL

Applicant

and

SPEDLEY SECURITIES LIMITED

(IN LIQUIDATION)

First Respondent

NEIL ROSS JONES

Second Respondent

JOHN PHILIP MAHER

Third Respondent

DAVID HAMILTON GRAY

Fourth Respondent

AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL INDUSTRIES

LIMITED

Fifth Respondent

Consent Orders

MASON CJ
DEANE J
DAWSON J
TOOHEY J

McHUGH J

Yuill 1 29/4/93

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 29 APRIL 1993, AT 10.21 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

MASON CJ:  The Deputy Registrar of the Court certifies that

she holds a consent duly signed by the solicitors

for the parties in this matter, to the making of an

order in the following terms.

1. That the application for special leave to

appeal filed in these proceedings be

dismissed.

2.       No order be made as to costs.

There will accordingly be consent orders in those

terms.

AT 10.22 AM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE

Yuill(2) 2 29/4/93
Details
AGLC
Yuill v Spedley Securities Limited (In Liquidation) [1993] HCATrans 99
Case
[1993] HCATrans 99
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved were Mr Brian Richard Yuill and Spedley Securities Limited (In Liquidation), with Australian National Industries also noted. The nature of the dispute and the specific legal issues before the High Court are not detailed in the provided transcript.

The High Court was presented with an application for special leave to appeal. The Deputy Registrar certified that the solicitors for the parties had consented to an order being made in specific terms.

The court made consent orders as agreed by the parties. These orders included that the application for special leave to appeal be dismissed, and that no order be made as to costs. The matter was subsequently adjourned sine die.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.