| SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA COURT OF APPEAL |
| S EAPCI 2023 0088 |
| JOSHUA ROY WATERS | First Applicant |
| and | |
| JRW ENTERPRISES PTY LTD (ACN 622 752 943) as trustee for THE J R WATERS FAMILY TRUST | Second Applicant |
| v | |
| DIESEL HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 145 993 326) AS TRUSTEE FOR THE DANIEL BAXTER FAMILY TRUST | First Respondent |
| AND | |
| DANIEL JOHN BAXTER | Second Respondent |
---
| JUDGES: | FERGUSON CJ, WALKER JA and GINNANE AJA |
| WHERE HELD: | Melbourne |
| DATE OF HEARING: | 10 April 2024 |
| DATE OF JUDGMENT: | 29 April 2024 |
| MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: | [2024] VSCA 77 |
| JUDGMENT APPEALED FROM: | [2023] VSC 455 (M Osborne J) |
---
CORPORATIONS – Directors – Automatic disqualification pursuant to s 206B(1)(b)(ii) of Corporations Act 2001 – Whether director had committed ‘offence involving dishonesty’ – Director convicted of family violence offences and bail offences – Whether offence ‘involves dishonesty’ depends on offence provision or common law rule not circumstances of offending – Dishonesty must be ‘inherent’ in offence but does not need to be element of offence – Offences in present case did not ‘involve dishonesty’ – Appeal dismissed.
Corporations Act 2001 ss 206A, 206B.
Australian Securities Commission v Lord (1991) 33 FCR 144; Pollard v DPP (Cth) (1992) 28 NSWLR 659; ABC v Victims of Crime Assistance Tribunal [2021] VSC 730; Barber v Law Society of New South Wales [No 2] [2001] NSWSC 861; DPP v Verigos [2007] VSC 97; Re Magna Alloys & Research Pty Ltd (1975) 1 ACLR 203; R v Barlow (1997) 188 CLR 1; Peters v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 493, discussed.
---
| Counsel | |||
| Applicants: | Mr H Heuzenroeder with Ms S Weinberg | ||
| Respondents: | Mr B J Murphy | ||
Solicitors | |||
| Applicants: | AXM Law | ||
| Respondents: | Velocity Legal | ||
FERGUSON CJ:
I agree with Walker JA.
WALKER JA:
The second respondent, Mr Baxter, is the director of the first respondent (‘Diesel Holdings’). He was previously also a director of another company, Rock Solid Structural Developments Pty Ltd (‘Rock Solid’). The applicant, Mr Waters, was also a director of Rock Solid. In 2021 and 2022 Mr Baxter was convicted of various offences, including causing injury intentionally, contravention of a family violence intervention order, contravening a conduct condition of bail and committing an indictable offence whilst on bail.
Section 206B(1)(b)(ii) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) provides that a person is disqualified from managing corporations if the person is ‘convicted of an offence that involves dishonesty and is punishable by imprisonment for at least 3 months’. ‘Dishonest’ is defined in s 9 of that Act to mean ‘dishonest according to the standards of ordinary people’.
After Mr Baxter’s convictions, Mr Waters caused documents to be filed with the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (‘ASIC’) notifying it that Mr Baxter had ceased to be a director of Rock Solid. Mr Waters also caused Rock Solid to sell property and pay the entirety of the proceeds of sale to JRW Enterprises Pty Ltd (‘JRW Enterprises’), which Mr Waters controlled, by the issue of certain special units.…
Continue reading Waters v Diesel Holdings Pty Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Waters v Diesel Holdings Pty Ltd [2024] VSCA 77
- Case
- [2024] VSCA 77
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the provisions of section 206B, which disqualifies a person from managing corporations if they are convicted of an offence involving dishonesty. The court referenced various judicial decisions to interpret what constitutes an "offence involving dishonesty." It was held that whether an offence involves dishonesty is determined by the offence provision itself or the common law, rather than the circumstances of the offending. Dishonesty must be inherent in the offence but does not need to be an element of the offence. The court found that the family violence and bail offences in this case did not involve dishonesty as required by the statute.
Based on the reasoning that the offences did not inherently involve dishonesty, the court dismissed the appeal. The decision of the lower court was upheld, and Waters remained disqualified from managing corporations. The court did not make any additional orders beyond dismissing the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Section 206B is found in pt 2D.6 of the Corporations Act, which is headed ‘Disqualification from managing corporations’. That part commences with s 206A, which provides as follows:Disqualified person not to manage corporations(1)A person who is disqualified from managing corporations under this Part commits an offence if:(a)they make, or participate in making, decisions that affect the whole, or a substantial part of, the business of the corporation; or(b)they exercise the capacity to affect significantly the corporation’s financial standing; or(c)they communicate instructions or wishes (other than advice given by the person in the proper performance of functions attaching to the person’s professional capacity or their business relationship with the directors or the corporations) to the directors of the corporation:(i)knowing that the directors are accustomed to act in accordance with the person’s instructions or wishes; or(ii)intending that the directors will act in accordance with those instructions of wishes.(1A)For an offence based on subsection (1), strict liability applies to the circumstance, that the person is disqualified from managing corporations under this Part.(1B) It is a defence to a contravention of subsection (1) if the person had permission to manage the corporation under either section 206GAB or 206G and their conduct was within the terms of that permission.(2)A person ceases to be a director, alternate director or secretary of a company if:(a)the person becomes disqualified from managing corporations under this Part; and(b)they are not given permission to manage the corporation under section 206GAB or 206G. Section 206B provides as follows:Automatic disqualification—convictions, bankruptcy and foreign court orders etcConvictions(1)A person becomes disqualified from managing corporations if the person:(a)is convicted on indictment of an offence that:(i)concerns the making, or participation in making, of decisions that affect the whole or a substantial part of the business of the corporation; or(ii)concerns an act that has the capacity to affect significantly the corporation’s financial standing; or(b)is convicted of an offence that:(i)is a contravention of this Act and is punishable by imprisonment for a period greater than 12 months; or(ii)involves dishonesty and is punishable by imprisonment for at least 3 months; or(c)is convicted of an offence against the law of a foreign country that is punishable by imprisonment for a period greater than 12 months.The offences covered by paragraph (a) and subparagraph (b)(ii) include offences against the law of a foreign country.(2)The period of disqualification under subsection (1) starts on the day the person is convicted and lasts for:(a)if the person does not serve a term of imprisonment—5 years after the day on which they are convicted; or(b)if the person serves a term of imprisonment—5 years after the day on which they are released from prison.Bankruptcy or personal insolvency agreement(3)A person is disqualified from managing corporations if the person is an undischarged bankrupt under the law of Australia, its external territories or another country.(4)A person is disqualified from managing corporations if:(a)the person has executed a personal insolvency agreement under:(i)Part X of the Bankruptcy Act 1966; or(ii)a similar law of an external Territory or a foreign country; and(b)the terms of the agreement have not been fully complied with.(5)A person is disqualified from managing corporations at a particular time if the person is, at that time, disqualified from managing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporations under Part 6-5 of the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006.Foreign court orders(6)A person is disqualified from managing corporations if the person is disqualified, under an order made by a court of a foreign jurisdiction that is in force, from:(a)being a director of a foreign company; or(b)being concerned in the management of a foreign company; or(c)being a director of a passport fund, or of an operator of a passport fund; or(d)being concerned in the management of a passport fund.Definitions(7)In this section:foreign jurisdiction means a foreign country, or part of a foreign country, prescribed by the regulations as a foreign jurisdiction for the purposes of this section.