Legal Research
Cases
Stanojevic v Damnjanovic

Stanojevic v Damnjanovic

Case [2024] VSC 350

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Stanojevic v Damnjanovic [2024] VSC 350
Case: [2024] VSC 350
Decision Date: 21 June 2024

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Stanojevic v Damnjanovic [2024] VSC 350

Most Recent Citation

Stanojevic v Damnjanovic (Costs Ruling) [2024] VSC 430

Cases Citing This Decision

Moyle v Quarles [No 3] [2025] WASC 443
Citation 1

…NZHC 1007 Rocke v Hart (1805) 11 Ves Jr 58, 60; 23 ER 1009 Savage v Lunn [1998] NSWCA 203 Skaftourous v Dimos [2002] VSC 198 Stanojevic v Damnjanovic [2024] VSC 350 Streeter v Western Areas [No 2] [2011] WASCA 17; (2011) 278 ALR 291 Tebbs v Carpenter (1816) 1 Madd 290; 56 ER 107 Tsaknis v Lilburne [2010] WASC 152…
Turch v Tripolone [2025] NSWSC 86
Citation 2 (Para 78)

…In Stanojevic v Damnjanovic & Anor [2024] VSC 350, the plaintiffs brought a claim against the defendant, either as executor or trustee under a resulting trust, that he had an obligation to collect rent from the person, Kristina, who he permitted to occupy a property which was either included in the deceased estat…
Stanojevic v Damnjanovic (Costs Ruling) [2024] VSC 430
Citation 3 (Para 1)

…would hear from the parties as to the precise form of orders to give effect to my reasons, and as to costs. [1] Stanojevic v Damnjanovic & Anor [2024] VSC 350 ( principal judgment ). [2]In this ruling, for clarity and without meaning any disrespect, I refer to the parties by their first names. [3]In this ruling,…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Limited (Trial Judgment) [2024] FCA 369
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…ence on the balance of probabilities, and that I should therefore make a finding to this effect. [36] Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Ltd (Trial Judgment) [2024] FCA 369. This decision is now on appeal.…
Palmanova Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia [2023] FCA 1391
Citation 2 (Para 1)

…y than all the other hypotheses available on the evidence’.[37] [37]Ibid [135], with reference to Palmanova Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia [2023] FCA 1391 at [21] (Perram J).…
Stubbings v Jams 2 Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 6
Citation 3

…) [2024] FCA 369 – Masters Home Improvement Pty Ltd v North East Solution Pty Ltd [2017] VSCA 88 – Stubbings v Jams 2 Pty Ltd (2022) 276 CLR 1.…
Torok v Becker [2020] NSWSC 1570
Citation 4

…[13]Citing Torok v Becker [2020] NSWSC 1570, [310].…
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Dinh [No 2] [2019] WASC 456
Citation 5 (Para 1)

…he essential terms of the agreement. [24] Dinh v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2021] WASCA 127. [25] Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Dinh [No 2] [2019] WASC 456.…
Thorne v Kennedy [2017] HCA 49
Citation 6

…onscientiously took advantage of a special disadvantage – Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 – Thorne v Kennedy (2017) 263 CLR 85 – Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 – Dinh v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2021] WASCA 127 – Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 621 – Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Ltd…
Hadden and Pendle [2017] FCCA 1610
Citation 7 (Para 1)

…r, for the reasons given above, I am not satisfied this was sufficient to ameliorate Svetozar’s vulnerability. [40]See for example, Hadden v Pendle [2017] FCCA 1610, [118]; Ribchenkov v Suncorp-Metway Ltd (2000) 175 ALR 650, 662-666. However, such advice does not necessarily rebut the inference, see Stubbings (n 14…
Vlahos Pty Ltd v Vlahos [2017] VSCA 166
Citation 8 (Para 1)

…in the same proportion as that of their contribution to the purchase price.[41] [41] Calvery v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242, 246; Vlahos Pty Ltd v Vlahos [2017] VSCA 166, [55].…
Porker v Richards [2016] SASC 98
Citation 9 (Para 1)

…Byrnes v Kendle (2011) 243 CLR 253 (‘ Kendle ’), 277 [67] (Gummow and Hayne JJ), 291 [119] (Heydon and Crennan JJ). [53]Citing Porker v Richards [2016] SASC 98, [98].…
BIDWELL & BIDWELL [2013] FamCA 984
Citation 10 (Para 1)

…ietor, is intended to have a beneficial interest in the same proportion as that of their contribution to the purchase price.[41] [41] Calvery v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242, 246; Vlahos Pty Ltd v Vlahos [2017] VSCA 166, [55].…
Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd [2013] HCA 25
Citation 11

…[12]Ibid 103, [38] (citations omitted). See also a discussion of these principles in Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 392 (‘ Kavakas’ ).…
Byrnes v Kendle [2011] HCA 26
Citation 12 (Para 1)

…pose of marketing for sale.[53] [51]Citing IMO the Will and Estate of Own Charles Brown, deceased [2016] VSC 258, [13(n)]. [52]Citing Byrnes v Kendle (2011) 243 CLR 253 (‘ Kendle ’), 277 [67] (Gummow and Hayne JJ), 291 [119] (Heydon and Crennan JJ). [53]Citing Porker v Richards [2016] SASC 98, [98].…
Duke Group Limited (in Liq) & Anor v Pilmer & Ors (No.6) No. Scciv-92-1874 [2004] SASC 147
Citation 13

…[56]Citing Pilmer v. Duke Group Ltd (in liq) (2001) 207 CLR 165, 197-198.…
Pilmer v Duke Group Ltd (In Liq) [2001] HCA 31
Citation 14

…[56]Citing Pilmer v. Duke Group Ltd (in liq) (2001) 207 CLR 165, 197-198.…
Ribchenkov v Suncorp-Metway Ltd [2000] FCA 835
Citation 15 (Para 1)

…as sufficient to ameliorate Svetozar’s vulnerability. [40]See for example, Hadden v Pendle [2017] FCCA 1610, [118]; Ribchenkov v Suncorp-Metway Ltd (2000) 175 ALR 650, 662-666. However, such advice does not necessarily rebut the inference, see Stubbings (n 14) 23-24 [48]-[50].…
Louth v Diprose [1992] HCA 61
Citation 16 (Para 1)

…that this inference must arise from the facts of the case, and is not a presumption which arises by operation of law.[32] [29] Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 621 (‘ Louth’ ). [30] Amadio (n 8) 474 (Deane J); Louth (n 29) 637 (Deane J). [31] Louth (n 29) 632 (Brennan J). [32]Ibid.…
Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14
Citation 17

…sadvantage – Whether first plaintiff unconscientiously took advantage of a special disadvantage – Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 – Thorne v Kennedy (2017) 263 CLR 85 – Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 – Dinh v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2021] WASCA 127 – Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 C…
Blomley v Ryan [1956] HCA 81
Citation 18 (Para 1)

…limited ability to speak, read, or write English may constitute a special disability.[23] [21] Amadio (n 8) 461-462 (Mason J); Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 (‘ Blomley’ ), 405 (Fullagar J). [22] Amadio (n 8) 462 (Mason J). [23]See for example, National Australia Bank v Petit-Breuilh [1999] VSC 368; Beroni v Corel…
Jenyns v Public Curator (Qld) [1953] HCA 2
Citation 19

…[16] Jenyns v Public Curator (Qld) (1953) 90 CLR 113, 118-119.…
Dinh v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2021] WASCA 127
Citation 20 (Para 1)

…n agreement was explained to her, and that she actually understood the essential terms of the agreement. [24] Dinh v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2021] WASCA 127. [25] Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Dinh [No 2] [2019] WASC 456.…
McNee v Lachlan McNee Family Maintenance Pty Ltd [2020] VSC 273
Citation 21 (Para 1)

…a duty to lease trust property and collect rent.[57] [57]The plaintiffs referred to a decision of Moore J in McNee v Lachlan McNee Family Maintenance [2020] VSC 273. This case involved an application for removal of a trustee. The relevant trust deed gave the sole director of the trustee company, a conditional rig…
Simmons v Ross [2018] VSC 306
Citation 22

…[58] Simmons v Ross [2018] VSC 306, [70].…
IMO the Will and Estate of Owen Charles Brown, deceased [2016] VSC 258
Citation 23 (Para 1)

…tee, such as keeping the property vacant for the purpose of marketing for sale.[53] [51]Citing IMO the Will and Estate of Own Charles Brown, deceased [2016] VSC 258, [13(n)]. [52]Citing Byrnes v Kendle (2011) 243 CLR 253 (‘ Kendle ’), 277 [67] (Gummow and Hayne JJ), 291 [119] (Heydon and Crennan JJ). [53]Citing P…

AI Chat coming soon