Safework NSW v Ru Dong Li

Link copied
Case Copied 19 min read

District Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v Ru Dong Li [2018] NSWDC 189
Hearing dates: 6 July 2018
Date of orders: 13 July 2018
Decision date: 13 July 2018
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Russell SC DCJ
Decision:

(1) The defendant is convicted.
(2) The defendant is fined $60,000.
(3) Order pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.
(4) Order the offender to pay the prosecutor’s costs agreed in the sum of $30,000.

Catchwords:

CRIMINAL LAW – prosecution – work health and safety – duty of persons undertaking business – risk of death or serious injury

SENTENCE – objective seriousness – mitigating factors – aggravating factors – plea of guilty – general deterrence – specific deterrence – appropriate penalty

SENTENCING PRINCIPLES – totality – remorse – contrition – appropriate penalty

COSTS – prosecution costs

OTHER – fall from ladder – need for risk assessment – need for falls prevention system – prevalence of prosecutions for falls from height – importance of general deterrence
Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Fines Act 1996
Work Health and Safety Act 2011
Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011
Cases Cited: Baumer v R (1998) 166 CLR 51
Bulga Underground Operations Pty Limited v Nash (2016) NSWCCA 37
BW v R [2011] NSWCCA 176
Capral Aluminium Limited v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (2000) 49 NSWLR 610
Jahandideh v R [2014] NSWCCA 178
Nash v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Limited; Attorney General for NSW v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Limited [2017] NSWCCA 96; 93 NSWLR 338
R v Borkowski (2009) 195 A Crim R 1
R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566
R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383
R v Wilkinson (No. 5) [2009] NSWSC 432
Veen v R (No. 2) (1998) 164 CLR
Texts Cited: AS/NZS 1892: Portable Ladders
Managing Risks of Falls at Workplaces: Code of Practice 2011
Category:Sentence
Parties: SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor)
Ru Dong Li (Defendant)
Representation:

Counsel:
M Moir (Prosecutor)
I Latham (Defendant)

  Solicitors:
SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor)
Juris Cor Legal (Defendant)
File Number(s): 2017/264954

Judgment

  1. Mr Ru Dong Li (the offender) has pleaded guilty to an offence that being a person conducting a business or undertaking who had a health and safety duty under s 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (the Act) he failed to comply with that duty and thereby exposed Mr Liang Ying Zhang to a risk of death or serious injury contrary to s 32 of the Act.

  2. The maximum penalty for the offence is a fine of $300,000.

BACKGROUND

  1. The prosecutor tendered a joint signed Statement Of Facts and a Prosecution Sentence Tender Bundle which form the basis of the background set out below.

  2. The offender (born 20 November 1964) traded as Apple Electronic Security. The offender conducted a business or undertaking which involved the installation of security systems including cameras, CCTV, anti-burglar alarms and back…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Safework NSW v Ru Dong Li and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] NSWDC 189
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In Safework NSW v Ru Dong Li, the defendant was prosecuted by Safework NSW for breaches of work health and safety laws, which arose from a failure to provide adequate safety measures at a construction site, resulting in a worker falling from a ladder. The case was heard and determined by the Local Court of New South Wales. The primary legal issue before the court was whether the defendant, as a person undertaking a business, had fulfilled their duty to ensure the health and safety of workers by preventing risks of death or serious injury. This involved assessing the adequacy of risk assessments and the implementation of falls prevention systems.

The court examined the objective seriousness of the incident, taking into account the potential for severe injury or death. It considered mitigating factors such as the defendant's plea of guilty and expressions of remorse, as well as aggravating factors including the frequency of such incidents and the importance of general deterrence. The court determined that the appropriate penalty should reflect the need to deter not only the defendant but also others in similar circumstances from engaging in unsafe practices. The court concluded that a substantial fine, coupled with an order to pay prosecution costs, was necessary to achieve these objectives.

Ru Dong Li was convicted and fined $60,000. The court ordered that 50% of the fine be paid to Safework NSW, and mandated the defendant to cover the agreed costs of $30,000. This decision underscores the importance of stringent safety measures in workplaces to prevent accidents and the role of the courts in enforcing compliance with work health and safety legislation.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) The defendant is convicted.

(2) The defendant is fined $60,000.

(3) Order pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.

(4) Order the offender to pay the prosecutor’s costs agreed in the sum of $30,000.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.