District Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v Ru Dong Li [2018] NSWDC 189 Hearing dates: 6 July 2018 Date of orders: 13 July 2018 Decision date: 13 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Russell SC DCJ Decision: (1) The defendant is convicted.
(2) The defendant is fined $60,000.
(3) Order pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.
(4) Order the offender to pay the prosecutor’s costs agreed in the sum of $30,000.Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – prosecution – work health and safety – duty of persons undertaking business – risk of death or serious injury
SENTENCE – objective seriousness – mitigating factors – aggravating factors – plea of guilty – general deterrence – specific deterrence – appropriate penalty
SENTENCING PRINCIPLES – totality – remorse – contrition – appropriate penalty
COSTS – prosecution costs
OTHER – fall from ladder – need for risk assessment – need for falls prevention system – prevalence of prosecutions for falls from height – importance of general deterrenceLegislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Fines Act 1996
Work Health and Safety Act 2011
Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011Cases Cited: Baumer v R (1998) 166 CLR 51
Bulga Underground Operations Pty Limited v Nash (2016) NSWCCA 37
BW v R [2011] NSWCCA 176
Capral Aluminium Limited v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (2000) 49 NSWLR 610
Jahandideh v R [2014] NSWCCA 178
Nash v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Limited; Attorney General for NSW v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Limited [2017] NSWCCA 96; 93 NSWLR 338
R v Borkowski (2009) 195 A Crim R 1
R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566
R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383
R v Wilkinson (No. 5) [2009] NSWSC 432
Veen v R (No. 2) (1998) 164 CLRTexts Cited: AS/NZS 1892: Portable Ladders
Managing Risks of Falls at Workplaces: Code of Practice 2011Category: Sentence Parties: SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor)
Ru Dong Li (Defendant)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
M Moir (Prosecutor)
I Latham (Defendant)
SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor)
Juris Cor Legal (Defendant)
File Number(s): 2017/264954
Judgment
-
Mr Ru Dong Li (the offender) has pleaded guilty to an offence that being a person conducting a business or undertaking who had a health and safety duty under s 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (the Act) he failed to comply with that duty and thereby exposed Mr Liang Ying Zhang to a risk of death or serious injury contrary to s 32 of the Act.
-
The maximum penalty for the offence is a fine of $300,000.
BACKGROUND
-
The prosecutor tendered a joint signed Statement Of Facts and a Prosecution Sentence Tender Bundle which form the basis of the background set out below.
-
The offender (born 20 November 1964) traded as Apple Electronic Security. The offender conducted a business or undertaking which involved the installation of security systems including cameras, CCTV, anti-burglar alarms and back…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Safework NSW v Ru Dong Li and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2018] NSWDC 189
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the objective seriousness of the incident, taking into account the potential for severe injury or death. It considered mitigating factors such as the defendant's plea of guilty and expressions of remorse, as well as aggravating factors including the frequency of such incidents and the importance of general deterrence. The court determined that the appropriate penalty should reflect the need to deter not only the defendant but also others in similar circumstances from engaging in unsafe practices. The court concluded that a substantial fine, coupled with an order to pay prosecution costs, was necessary to achieve these objectives.
Ru Dong Li was convicted and fined $60,000. The court ordered that 50% of the fine be paid to Safework NSW, and mandated the defendant to cover the agreed costs of $30,000. This decision underscores the importance of stringent safety measures in workplaces to prevent accidents and the role of the courts in enforcing compliance with work health and safety legislation.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) The defendant is convicted.
(2) The defendant is fined $60,000.
(3) Order pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.
(4) Order the offender to pay the prosecutor’s costs agreed in the sum of $30,000.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.