District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v BS & JH Bailey Pty Limited [2016] NSWDC 148 Hearing dates: 19 July 2016 Date of orders: 19 July 2016 Decision date: 19 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: KEARNS DCJ Decision: I grant the defendant leave to withdraw the plea of guilty entered on 9 February 2015.
Catchwords: Occupational health and safety; a plea of guilty was entered by defendant; circumstances in which a plea of guilty may be allowed to be withdrawn; defendant not in possession of all the facts when the plea was entered Legislation Cited: Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 Cases Cited: R v Hura (2001) 121 A Crim R 472 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: SafeWork New South Wales (prosecutor)
BS & JH Bailey Pty Limited (defendant)Representation: Counsel:
Mr E James, instructed by SafeWork NSW, appeared for the prosecutor
Mr Bailey appeared in person for the defendant
File Number(s): 2013/7297
RULING
-
This matter is listed before me for today and tomorrow, on a plea of guilty to a charge that the defendant company had breached an obligation it was under, under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000. The prosecution arises in respect of an incident that occurred on 22 January 2011, at a construction site at 131 Willarong Road, Caringbah.
-
Some residential units were being erected there and the defendant was the principal contractor on the site. It had subcontracted with a company called Future Form (NSW) Pty Ltd for the provision of steel fixing and formwork services. It had contracted with a company called Giraffe Scaffolding Pty Ltd for the provision of scaffolding.
-
The incident occurred when an employee of Future Form, Mr Roumaihi, fell from scaffolding adjacent to level 4 of the work being undertaken. In brief, he had a fall to the ground and suffered injury.
-
The plea of guilty was entered by the defendant on 9 February 2015. At the time, Mr Bailey, whom I take to be a director and shareholder of the defendant company, was unaware of a piece of evidence that has relatively recently come to light. That evidence is contained in an affidavit of Troy Mills affirmed on 19 August 2015. He was working on the site as a foreman for Giraffe. He appears to have been responsible for the erection of the scaffolding on the site. In that affidavit, he states that before he left the site on the day before the incident, "…I placed a sign which is commonly referred to as 'Scafftag' on which it is stated, in large capital letters, words to the effect of 'INCOMPLETE SCAFFOLD. DO NOT ENTER', at the entry to the staircase to the scaffold on the ground level."
-
That information was not made available to Mr Bailey until 21 June 2016, or soon thereafter. On that date, the defendants' solicitors, or by then, I think, former solicitors, sent a copy of Mr Mills's affidavit to the solicitor for the prosecutor. Mr Bailey has informed me…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read R v BS and JH Bailey Pty Limited and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] NSWDC 148
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether JH Bailey Pty Limited had a valid basis to withdraw its plea of guilty due to not having all the relevant facts available at the time the plea was entered. The court examined the principles governing the withdrawal of pleas of guilty and assessed whether there were exceptional circumstances justifying the withdrawal.
The court found that there were indeed exceptional circumstances present in this case. It determined that the defendant was not in possession of all the facts when the plea was entered, which impacted its ability to make an informed decision. The court recognised that justice required the plea to be withdrawn to ensure that the defendant could be properly informed of the charges and consequences. Consequently, the court granted leave for the defendant to withdraw its plea of guilty.
Orders
Orders of the court
I grant the defendant leave to withdraw the plea of guilty entered on 9 February 2015.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.