PLAINTIFF M168/10, A MINOR, BY HIS LITIGATION GUARDIAN SISTER BRIGID (MARIE) ARTHUR PLAINTIFF
AND
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA & ANOR DEFENDANTS
Matter No M169/2010
PLAINTIFF M169/10, BY HIS LITIGATION GUARDIAN SISTER BRIGID (MARIE) ARTHUR PLAINTIFF
AND
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP & ANOR DEFENDANTS
Matter No M170/2010
PLAINTIFF M170/10, A MINOR, BY HIS LITIGATION GUARDIAN SISTER BRIGID (MARIE) ARTHUR PLAINTIFF
AND
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA & ANOR DEFENDANTS
Matter No M171/2010
PLAINTIFF M171/10, BY HIS LITIGATION GUARDIAN SISTER BRIGID (MARIE) ARTHUR PLAINTIFF
AND
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP & ANOR DEFENDANTS
Matter No M172/2010
PLAINTIFF M172/10, BY HIS LITIGATION GUARDIAN SISTER BRIGID (MARIE) ARTHUR PLAINTIFF
AND
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA & ANOR DEFENDANTS
Matter No M173/2010
PLAINTIFF M173/10, BY HIS LITIGATION GUARDIAN SISTER BRIGID (MARIE) ARTHUR PLAINTIFF
AND
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP & ANOR DEFENDANTS
Matter No M174/2010
PLAINTIFF M174/10, A MINOR, BY HIS LITIGATION GUARDIAN SISTER BRIGID (MARIE) ARTHUR PLAINTIFF
AND
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA & ANOR DEFENDANTS
Matter No M175/2010
PLAINTIFF M175/10, BY HIS LITIGATION GUARDIAN SISTER BRIGID (MARIE) ARTHUR PLAINTIFF
AND
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP & ANOR DEFENDANTS
Plaintiff M168/10 v The Commonwealth Plaintiff M169/10 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship Plaintiff M170/10 v The Commonwealth Plaintiff M171/10 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship Plaintiff M172/10 v The Commonwealth Plaintiff M173/10 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship Plaintiff M174/10 v The Commonwealth Plaintiff M175/10 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] HCA 25
In matters M168/2010, M170/2010, M172/2010 and M174/2010:
1.The application made by summons dated 23 December 2010 for an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendants or any officer, servant or agent of the defendants from detaining the plaintiff and/or for an order that the plaintiff be released from detention until the hearing and determination of these proceedings is dismissed.
2.The proceedings be stood out of the list to await the hearing and determination of related proceedings.
3. Liberty to apply.
In matters M169/2010, M171/2010, M173/2010 and M175/2010:
1.Pursuant to s 486A(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), the time within which an application may be made for a remedy in relation to the decision made on or about 16 February 2010 to detain the plaintiff on Christmas Island ("the detention decision") be extended to 17 December 2010.
2.To the extent that it is necessary to do so, pursuant to r 25.06.1 of the High Court Rules 2004, the time to apply for an order to show cause why a writ of certiorari should not issue to remove the detention decision for the purpose of its being quashed be enlarged to 17 December 2010.
3.The application made by summons dated 23 December 2010 for an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendants or any officer, servant or agent of the defendants from detaining the plaintiff and/or for an order that the plaintiff be released from detention until the hearing of these proceedings is dismissed.
4.On…
Grounds of appeal
[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.
[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.
[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.
Consideration
[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.
[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.
Continue reading Plaintiff M168/10 v The Commonwealth
Sign in free to access the full text
Details
AGLC
Plaintiff M168/10 v The Commonwealth [2011] HCA 25
Case
[2011] HCA 25
Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In matters M168/2010, M170/2010, M172/2010 and M174/2010, Crennan J of the High Court of Australia considered applications for interlocutory injunctions brought by plaintiffs who had arrived in Australian waters by boat and were treated as unlawful non-citizens under the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth). The plaintiffs sought to restrain their detention on Christmas Island and subsequent transfer to mainland immigration detention, arguing that such detention was unlawful.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the plaintiffs had established a prima facie case that their continuing detention on the mainland was unlawful, thereby justifying the grant of interlocutory injunctions. This required the Court to consider the threshold for establishing a "prima facie case" in the context of immigration detention.
Crennan J dismissed the applications for interlocutory injunctions in these matters. The Court reasoned that the plaintiffs had not demonstrated a sufficient likelihood of success on the merits to warrant the grant of such urgent relief. The proceedings were subsequently stood out of the list to await the determination of related proceedings, with liberty to apply. In separate, but related, matters (M169/2010, M171/2010, M173/2010 and M175/2010), the Court made orders extending time for applications related to detention decisions and adjourned a directions hearing, indicating that the substantive legal issues were still to be fully determined.
Orders
Orders of the court
In matters M168/2010, M170/2010, M172/2010 and M174/2010:
1. The application made by summons dated 23 December 2010 for an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendants or any officer, servant or agent of the defendants from detaining the plaintiff and/or for an order that the plaintiff be released from detention until the hearing and determination of these proceedings is dismissed.
2. The proceedings be stood out of the list to await the hearing and determination of related proceedings.
3. Liberty to apply.
In matters M169/2010, M171/2010, M173/2010 and M175/2010:
1. Pursuant to s 486A(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), the time within which an application may be made for a remedy in relation to the decision made on or about 16 February 2010 to detain the plaintiff on Christmas Island ("the detention decision") be extended to 17 December 2010.
2. To the extent that it is necessary to do so, pursuant to r 25.06.1 of the High Court Rules 2004, the time to apply for an order to show cause why a writ of certiorari should not issue to remove the detention decision for the purpose of its being quashed be enlarged to 17 December 2010.
3. The application made by summons dated 23 December 2010 for an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendants or any officer, servant or agent of the defendants from detaining the plaintiff and/or for an order that the plaintiff be released from detention until the hearing of these proceedings is dismissed.
4. On or before 18 February 2011, the defendants file and serve any evidence on which they propose to rely.
5. On or before 25 February 2011, the plaintiff file and serve:
(a) any further evidence on which he proposes to rely; and
(b) any proposed amendment to the application for relief.
6. Reserve liberty to apply, on the giving of two days' notice to opposite parties.
7. The directions hearing be adjourned to 9:30 am on 28 February 2011.