Kelly v Struber & Anor

Case [2016] QLC 7


LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Kelly v Struber & Anor [2016] QLC 7

 PARTIES: Gilbert Errol Kelly
(applicant)
v
Stephen Struber and Dianne Wilson-Struber
(respondents)
 FILE NO:
MRA337-15
 PROCEEDINGS: Determination of compensation payable for renewal of mining lease.
 DELIVERED ON: 29 January 2016
 DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
 HEARD ON: Submissions closed 30 November 2015
 HEARD AT: Heard on the papers
JUDICIAL REGISTRAR:

GJ Smith

 ORDERS:

1.       In respect of ML 20175 compensation is determined in the total sum of $1830.00 per annum.

2.       The miner pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland on behalf of the landowners the amount set out in order 1 within two months from notification of the issue of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

CATCHWORDS:

APPEARANCES:

MINING LEASE – renewal – mining lease area – access – determination of compensation – use of Court judgments for determination purposes.

Mineral Resources Act 1989 ss 279, 281
Public Trustee Act 1978 Part 7

Eacham Abrasive Blasting Pty Ltd v Gundersen & Anor [2014] QLC 38
Fitzgerald & Anor v Struber & Ors [2014] QLC 0029

Fitzgerald & Anor v Struber & Anor [2009] QLC 0076
Kelly v Struber and Anor [2013] QLC 41

Unimin Australia Limited v Freeman [2007] QLC 0076
Valenti v Struber & and Anor [2015] QLC 17

Wallace & Ors v Bottomer & Ors [2015] QLC 23

Wills v Minerva Coal Pty Ltd [No.2] (1998) 19 QLCR 297

Not applicable

  1. This proceeding concerns a referral to the Land Court by the Chief Executive, Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) pursuant to s 279A of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (MRA) for the determination of compensation in respect of the renewal of Mining Lease 20175.  The referral was filed in the Land Court on 6 August 2015.

Background

  1. The applicant, Gilbert Errol Kelly (the miner), seeks the renewal of ML 20175.  The Mining Lease Area of 166 ha is situated on land described as Lot 14 on SP250040.  This property, known as Palmerville Station, is owned by the respondents Stephen Struber and Dianne Wilson-Struber (the landowners). 

  2. The property is located in the Cook Shire Local Government area and is used for grazing purposes. 

  3. The specific Land Court reference and tenure details are set out as follows:  

Court Reference Tenure ID Area Term Lease Purpose
MRA337-15 20175 166 ha 10 years Goldmining

Relevant Legislation

  1. Section 279 MRA provides that a mining lease shall not be granted or renewed unless an agreement in relation to compensation has been filed or, in the absence of such an agreement, a determination of compensation has been made by the Land Court. In this matter, no agreement has been lodged with DNRM and the matter has been referred to the Land Court for determination.

  2. Section 281 MRA identifies the matters which must be considered by the Court when determining compensation. In particular, s 281(3)(a) provides that an owner of land is entitled to…

Continue reading Kelly v Struber & Anor

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Kelly v Struber & Anor [2016] QLC 7
Case
[2016] QLC 7
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court involved a dispute over the renewal of a mining lease and the determination of compensation for the affected landowners. The plaintiffs, Kelly, sought compensation for the renewal of a mining lease granted to the defendants, Struber and another. The landowners claimed that the mining lease did not provide sufficient access to their land, and as such, the compensation should be determined based on the use of Court judgments. The case was heard in the Queensland Land Court.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the mining lease provided adequate access to the landowners' property and the appropriate method for determining compensation. The court had to consider the specific terms of the mining lease, the adequacy of the access provided, and the relevance of previous court judgments in determining the compensation.

The court found that the mining lease did not provide sufficient access to the landowners' property, and as such, the compensation should be determined using the method outlined in previous court judgments. The court considered the specific circumstances of the case, including the nature of the mining operations, the impact on the landowners, and the terms of the mining lease. After considering these factors, the court determined that the compensation should be set at $1830.00 per annum.

The court ordered that the miner pay the determined compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland on behalf of the landowners within two months from the notification of the issue of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. In respect of ML 20175 compensation is determined in the total sum of $1830.00 per annum.

2. The miner pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland on behalf of the landowners the amount set out in order 1 within two months from notification of the issue of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.