Brown v Struber & Anor

Case [2016] QLC 54


LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Brown v Struber & Anor [2016] QLC 54
PARTIES: Stephen John Brown
(applicant)

v

Stephen Roy Struber & Dianne Rose Wilson-Struber

(respondents)

FILE NO: MRA215-16
DIVISION: General Division
PROCEEDING: Determination of compensation for renewal of a mining lease.
DELIVERED ON: 16 September 2016
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARD ON: Submissions closed 18 August 2016
HEARD AT: Heard on the papers
JUDICIAL REGISTRAR: GJ Smith
ORDER:

1.     In respect of ML 20243 compensation is determined in the total sum of $95 per annum.

2.     The applicant pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland in the amount set out in order 1 within one month from notification of the renewal of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

CATCHWORDS:

MINING LEASE – renewal – referral – determination of   compensation – absence of expert or valuation evidence – use of Court judgments for determination purposes.

Mineral Resources Act 1989 s 281(1)

Public Trustee Act 1978

Eacham Abrasive Blasting Pty Ltd v Gundersen & Anor [2014] QLC 38
Fitzgerald v Struber & Anor[2016] QLC 6
Re Fitzgerald & Anor v Struber & Anor [2009] QLC 76
Kelly v Struber & Anor [2016] QLC 7
Wallace & Ors v Bottomer & Ors [2015] QLC 23
Wills v Minerva Coal Pty Ltd [No.2] (1998) 19 QLCR 29

APPEARANCES: Not applicable
  1. This proceeding concerns a referral to the Land Court by the Chief Executive, Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) pursuant to s 281(1) of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (MRA) for the determination of compensation in respect of the renewal of Mining Lease 20243 (ML 20243). The referral documents list the address for the respondents as:

    PRINCIPAL PUBLIC TRUST OFFICER
              PUBLIC TRUST OFFICE
              PO BOX 656

    CAIRNS QLD 4870

Background

  1. The applicant, Stephen John Brown (the miner) seeks the renewal of a mining lease located on land described as Lot 14 on SP 250040.  The Mining Lease Area comprises of 7.00 ha and a 7.6 km access track across land owned by the respondents Stephen Struber and Dianne Wilson-Struber (the landowners). 

  2. The subject land, known as Palmerville Station is located in the Mareeba Shire Local Government area and is used for grazing purposes. 

  3. The specific Land Court reference and tenure details are set out as follows: 

Court Reference Tenure ID Area Term Lease Purpose
MRA215-16 ML 20243 7 ha 10 years Camp

Relevant Legislation

  1. Section 279 of the MRA provides that a mining lease shall not be granted or renewed unless an agreement in relation to compensation has been filed or, in the absence of such an agreement, a determination of compensation has been made by the Land Court.  In this matter, no agreement has been lodged with DNRM and the matter has been referred to the Land Court for determination.

  2. Section 281 of the MRA identifies the matters which must be considered by the Court when determining compensation. In particular, s 281(3)(a)…

Continue reading Brown v Struber & Anor

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Brown v Struber & Anor [2016] QLC 54
Case
[2016] QLC 54
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Brown v Struber & Anor, the applicant sought the renewal of a mining lease, specifically ML 20243, and the determination of compensation for its renewal. The respondent raised concerns about the compensation amount, arguing that the applicant had not provided expert or valuation evidence to support their claim. The matter was heard in the Queensland Land Court, where the court was required to determine the appropriate compensation for the lease renewal.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicant could establish the amount of compensation without providing expert or valuation evidence, and if the court could rely on previous judgments to determine this amount. The court considered the absence of such evidence and examined whether the use of previous judgments was appropriate and sufficient for determining compensation in the absence of expert evidence. The court also needed to decide whether the compensation amount proposed by the applicant was reasonable and in line with established legal principles.

The court found that the absence of expert or valuation evidence did not preclude it from determining the compensation amount. It relied on previous judgments, which provided a framework for assessing compensation for mining lease renewals. The court held that the compensation amount proposed by the applicant was reasonable and in line with the principles established in previous cases. Consequently, the court determined the compensation for the renewal of ML 20243 to be $95 per annum.

The court ordered that the applicant pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland in the amount set out in order 1, within one month from notification of the renewal of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. In respect of ML 20243 compensation is determined in the total sum of $95 per annum.

2. The applicant pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland in the amount set out in order 1 within one month from notification of the renewal of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.