LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Brown v NBT Pty Ltd [2016] QLC 64 PARTIES: Stephen John Brown
(applicant)v NBT Pty Ltd ACN 001 945 446
(respondent)
FILE NO/s: MRA217-16 DIVISION: General Division PROCEEDING: Determination of compensation for renewal of a mining lease. DELIVERED ON: 3 November 2016 DELIVERED AT: Brisbane HEARD ON: Submissions closed 18 August 2016 HEARD AT: Heard on the papers JUDICIAL REGISTRAR: GJ Smith ORDERS: 1. In respect of ML 20243 compensation is determined in the total sum of $500.00.
2. The applicant pay compensation to the respondent the amount set out in order 1 within two months from notification of the renewal of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines.
CATCHWORDS: MINING LEASE – renewal – referral – determination of compensation – absence of expert or valuation evidence – use of Court judgments for determination purposes.
Mineral Resources Act 1989, s 281(1)
Public Trustee Act 1978
Corella Valley Corporation Pty Ltd v Power & Anor [2014] QLC 46
Eacham Abrasive Blasting Pty Ltd v Gundersen & Anor [2014] QLC 38
Fitzgerald v Struber & Anor[2016] QLC 6
Re Fitzgerald & Anor v Struber & Anor [2009] QLC 76
Kelly v Struber & Anor [2016] QLC 7
Wallace & Ors v Bottomer & Ors [2015] QLC 23
Wills v Minerva Coal Pty Ltd [No.2] (1998) 19 QLCR 297
APPEARANCES: Not applicable
This proceeding concerns a referral to the Land Court by the Chief Executive, Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) pursuant to s 281(1) of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (MRA) for the determination of compensation in respect of the renewal of Mining Lease 20243 (ML 20243).
Background
The applicant, Stephen John Brown (the miner) seeks the renewal of a mining lease located on land described as Lot 4567 on SP 254826. The area relevant to this determination concerns an 8.5 km access track across land owned by the respondent, NBT Pty Ltd ACN 001 945 446 (the landowner).
The subject land, known as Bellevue Station is located in the Mareeba Shire Local Government area and is used for grazing purposes.
The specific Land Court reference and tenure details are set out as follows:
Court Reference Tenure ID Relevant Area Term Purpose MRA217-16 ML 20243 8.5 ha 10 years Access Relevant Legislation
Section 279 of the MRA provides that a mining lease shall not be granted or renewed unless an agreement in relation to compensation has been filed or, in the absence of such an agreement, a determination of compensation has been made by the Land Court. In this matter, no agreement has been lodged with DNRM and the matter has been referred to the Land Court for determination.
Section 281 of the MRA identifies the matters which must be considered by the Court when determining compensation. In particular, s 281(3)(a) provides that an owner of land is entitled to compensation for:
“(i) deprivation of possession of the surface of land of the owner;
(ii) diminution of the value…
Continue reading Brown v NBT Pty Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Brown v NBT Pty Ltd [2016] QLC 64
- Case
- [2016] QLC 64
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was how to determine the compensation for the renewal of the mining lease in the absence of any expert or valuation evidence. The court had to decide whether it could rely on previous judgments or other means to determine the compensation. The court considered whether it could use the compensation awarded in similar cases or the market value of the land as a basis for its decision.
The court held that in the absence of expert or valuation evidence, it could determine the compensation by referring to previous judgments in similar matters. The court noted that the compensation awarded in previous cases, where the facts were sufficiently similar, could serve as a reasonable basis for determining the compensation in the current case. The court also considered the market value of the land as an alternative means of determining the compensation. Ultimately, the court determined the compensation to be $500, based on the compensation awarded in similar cases and the market value of the land.
The court ordered that the applicant pay compensation to the respondent in the total sum of $500 within two months from notification of the renewal of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. In respect of ML 20243 compensation is determined in the total sum of $500.00.
2. The applicant pay compensation to the respondent the amount set out in order 1 within two months from notification of the renewal of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.