-
Return to Work Corporation of South Australia v Sweeney
[2025] SASCA 50
Citation 1
…h Australia [2020] SASCFC 59; Harris v GM Holden Limited [2018] SAET 150; Hazeldene’s Chicken Farm v VWA (No 2) (2005) VSCA 298; HJ Heinz v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311; Hope v Bathurst City Council (1980) 144 CLR 1; Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794; Kaye v Return to Work SA [2018] SAET 143; Kimber v Chief Ex…
-
Vicinity Centres PM Pty Ltd v Arik
[2023] VSCA 295
Citation 2
(Para 7)
…show that the methodology is not in accordance with the Guides, being a document intended for application by medical practitioners. [2][2009] VSC 311, [46] (‘ Heinz ’). [3](2012) 38 VR 45; [2012] VSCA 322 (‘ Gamble ’). [4]Ibid 61 [56] (Maxwell P and Cavanough AJA).…
-
Amcor Plc v Scardamaglia
[2023] VSCA 290
Citation 3
(Para 1)
…y expert medical practitioners, and ‘should not be overlaid with legalistic interpretation’.[23] [23]See HJ Heinz Company Australia Ltd v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311, [26] (‘ Heinz ’). (2)It is of ‘paramount importance’ to be faithful to the plain words of the ASOHNS Guidelines.[24] (3)Section 91(1) of the Act provide…
-
Paschalis v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia
[2021] SASCFC 44
Citation 4
(Para 10)
…nd an example which seeks to illustrate what is said in the text, the text will prevail.[62] [51] H J Heinz Company Limited v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311, [24]-[28] (Kyrou J). [52] Barnett v Transport Accident Commission (1999) 15 VAR 414, [30]; aff’d and reasons adopted in Barnett v Transport Accident Commission (200…
-
Dallimore v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia (No 2)
[2021] SASCFC 8
Citation 5
(Para 3)
…ven my reasons for judgment. I would hear the parties as to costs. [1] [2018] SAET 67 at [78]. [2] HJ Heinz Company Australia Ltd v Kotzman & Ors [2009] VSC 311 at [24]; Frkic v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia (No. 2) [2020] SASCFC 59 at [28]. [3] [2020] SASCFC 115 at [54]. Application to set aside…
-
Dallimore v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia
[2020] SASCFC 115
Citation 6
(Para 12)
…een the text in the Guides and an example which seeks to illustrate what is said in the text, the text will prevail. [citations omitted] [11] [2009] VSC 311. [12] [2009] VSC 311 at [24]-[28].…
-
Frkic v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia (No 2)
[2020] SASCFC 59
Citation 7
…245; Barnett v The Transport Accident Commission [1999] 15 VAR 414; Barnett v The Transport Accident Commission [2001] VSCA 12; Hines v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311; Gillat v The Transport Accident Commission (2003) 19 VAR 376, considered.…
-
Whittlesea City Council v Mohammed
[2019] VSCA 118
Citation 8
(Para 1)
…ached the construction of the relevant structural inclusion as a question of law — citing Kyrou J in H J Heinz Co Australia Ltd v Kotzman .[11] [11][2009] VSC 311 [36]–[40].…
-
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
[2017] FCA 802
Citation 9
(Para 12)
…158; Walker v Wilson (1991) 172 CLR 195 at 208; Winn v Director-General of National Parks and Wildlife (2001) 130 LGERA 508 at [251]; HJ Heinz Company Australia Ltd v Kotzman (2009) 31 VAR 206 at [44]; Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical Pty Ltd [2012] VSCA 322 at [52]. This is to be contrasted with an expression such as “under this Part”, which ha…
-
CEPU (Western Australia Division) v Fortescue Metals Group Ltd
[2016] FCCA 1227
Citation 10
(Para 17)
…t 208; Winn v Director General of National Parks and Wildlife and Ors [2001] NSWCA 17 at [251] ; H J Heinz Co Australia Ltd v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311 at [44] ; Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical Pty Ltd [2012] VSCA 322 at [52] . This is to be contrasted with an expression such as “under this Part”, which has been he…
-
Njegovan v Nayshon Pty Ltd
[2014] WADC 111
Citation 11
(Para 24)
…In HJ Heinz Co Australia Ltd v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311 [25] ‑ [27] Kyrou J provided the following summary of the case law in Victoria which had dealt with the interpretation of the AMA Guides: It has been said that to the extent that an Act requires determinations of impairment to be made in accordance with the Gu…
-
Ramsay v Sunbuild Pty Ltd
[2014] FCA 54
Citation 12
(Para 8)
…195 at 208; Winn v Director General of National Parks and Wildlife and Ors [2001] NSWCA 17 at [251]; H J Heinz Co Australia Ltd v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311 at [44]; Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical Pty Ltd [2012] VSCA 322 at [52]. This is to be contrasted with an expression such as “under this Part”, which has been…
-
Victorian WorkCover Authority v Elsdon
[2013] VSCA 235
Citation 13
(Para 1)
…law. He regarded the competing medical views as largely mirroring the legal debate concerning the proper construction of Structural Inclusion (2). [7][2009] VSC 311, [24]-[28].…
-
Lingenberg v Gallichio
[2013] VSCA 143
Citation 14
…[18] Heinz Co Australia Ltd v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311, [46] (Kyrou J).…
-
Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical Pty Ltd
[2012] VSCA 322
Citation 15
(Para 1)
…, affirmed on appeal Barnett v Transport Accident Commission (2001) 34 MVR 26; Gillat [2003] 38 MVR 463, [27] (Nettle J); Heinz [2009] VSC 311, [24] (Kyrou J); Transport Accident Commission v Serwylo [2010] VSC 421, [25] (Kaye J). [52] Mountain Pine Furniture Pty Ltd v Taylor (2007) 16 VR 659, 660 [2], 672 [46].…
-
Capel Sound v Sim
[2025] VSC 485
Citation 16
(Para 1)
…196, [28]–[29]; Vicinity Centres Pty Ltd v Arik [2023] VSCA 295, [4] (‘ Vicinity Centres v Arik ’). [5] HJ Heinz Co Australia v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311, [24]; Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical Pty Ltd (2012) 38 VR 45 (‘ Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical ’). See also Vicinity Centres v Arik (n 4) .…
-
Gray v Victorian WorkCover Authority
[2024] VSC 680
Citation 17
(Para 4)
…d show that the methodology is not in accordance with the Guides, being a document intended for application by medical practitioners.[12] [9] HJ Heinz Company Australia Ltd v Kotzman (2009) VSC 311. [10][2023] VSCA 295 (‘ Vicinity ’). [11](2012) 38 VR 45. [12] Vicinity (n 10) [7] (Niall and Macaulay JJA).…
-
Swan Hill District Health v Graham
[2023] VSC 454
Citation 18
(Para 1)
…t regard, in H J Heinz Company Australia Ltd v Kotzman (‘ Heinz ’),[23] Kyrou J (as his Honour then was) stated, among other things, that – [23][2009] VSC 311 (‘ Heinz ’ ).…
-
Boroondara City Council v Howell
[2023] VSC 406
Citation 19
(Para 1)
…formity with the Guides, by applying the methodologies specified by the Guides.[23] [22]Referring to HJ Heinz Company Australia Ltd v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311, [26] ( HJ Heinz ) and Victorian WorkCover Authority v Elsdon (2013) 42 VR 434, [49]. [23]Referring to HJ Heinz , [45]–[48].…
-
Skarbek v Brand
[2023] VSC 346
Citation 20
(Para 1)
…re higher level considerations, not mere matters of evidence.[20] [18] H J Heinz Company Australia Ltd v Kotzman (2009) 31 VAR 206, [2009] VSC 311, [26] (Kyrou J). [19] Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical Pty Ltd (2012) 38 VR 45, [58] (‘ Heinz’ ). [20] Chang v Neill (2019) 62 VR 174, [71]-[72] (‘Chang’).…
-
Arik v Vicinity Centres PM Pty Ltd
[2023] VSC 94
Citation 21
(Para 1)
…d legalistically, as if it was a statute.[38] [38] Elsdon , [49] (Bongiorno JA and Dixon AJA), quoting HJ Heinz Company Australia Ltd v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311, [24]–[28].…
-
Troeth v Cerberus Catering Pty Ltd
[2022] VSC 767
Citation 22
…[40]T51-55. Senior counsel for the first defendant referred to H J Heinz Company Australia Ltd v Kotzmann [2009] VSC 311, Latchford v Gibbons [2021] VSC 229 and Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480.…
-
Freedman v Gomperts
[2022] VSC 780
Citation 23
(Para 1)
…departure from the Guides, and constituted an error of law.[40] [40] Edwards (n 28), [82]. See also H J Heinz Company Australia Pty Ltd v Kotzmann [2009] VSC 311, [25].…
-
Bhelley v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd
[2022] VSC 446
Citation 24
(Para 1)
…provide standard protocols and criteria for estimating a person’s degree of permanent impairment.[4] [4] H J Heinz Company Australia Ltd v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311 [10] citing the Guides Foreword and pp 2/7, 2/9 (‘ Heinz ’).…
-
La Rosa v Patrick
[2022] VSC 404
Citation 25
(Para 1)
…xercise of professional judgment in selecting the most appropriate methodology’ (to use Kyrou J’s language in Heinz [43]). [43] Heinz [2009] VSC 311, [46].…
-
Golden City Support Services v Forrest
[2021] VSC 582
Citation 26
…[24] HJ Heinz & Anor v Kotzman & Ors [2009] VSC 311 ( ‘HJ Heinz’ ), [24]–[28]. Citations omitted.…
-
Edwards v State of Victoria
[2021] VSC 423
Citation 27
(Para 1)
…A Guides and GEPIC is a question of law.[52] [51]Wrongs Act, ss 28LH and s 28LI(1). See [21] above. [52] HJ Heinz Company Australia Pty Ltd v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311, [24], applied in relation to GEPIC in YG-1 Australia Pty Ltd v Brann [2016] VSC 713, [54].…
-
Latchford v Gibbons
[2021] VSC 229
Citation 28
(Para 1)
…he Guides is appropriate. Any error in doing so would not be one of law. As Kyrou J observed in HJ Heinz Company Australia Ltd & Anor v Kotzman & Ors [2009] VSC 311:…
-
La'Brooy v Jensen
[2021] VSC 89
Citation 29
(Para 1)
…man , ‘[i]t is of paramount importance to be faithful to the Guides’ plain words’.[29] [28] H J Heinz Company Australia Ltd v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311 (‘ Heinz v Kotzman ’). [29]Ibid [26] (citations omitted). A medical panel is not, however, required to apply the Guides in identifying any unrelated impairment, and…
-
Jerak v Dr Lazarus & Ors
[2020] VSC 729
Citation 30
(Para 1)
…h it is not necessary to do so, it is desirable to make some observations on the arguments that were presented. [50] H J Heinz & Anor v Kotzman & Ors [2009] VSC 311.…
-
Rashidi v Holsman
[2020] VSC 413
Citation 31
…[11][2009] VSC 311 (‘ Heinz ’).…
-
City of Melbourne v Neppessen
[2019] VSC 84
Citation 32
(Para 1)
…diction (in this case, the Wrongs Act ).[38] [37] Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 ord 56. [38] H J Heinz Company Limited v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311 [38] (‘ Heinz ’), citing Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24, 39 (‘ Peko-Wallsend ’).…
-
State of Victoria v Jerak
[2018] VSC 680
Citation 33
(Para 1)
…ent. Kyrou J held that the panel had introduced a new issue extraneous to the Guides and not given the plaintiff prior notice of the issue.[21] [20][2009] VSC 311. [21]Ibid [63]–[64].…
-
Pickett v Parks Victoria
[2018] VSC 473
Citation 34
…VBA – Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 – HJ Heinz Company Australia Limited & Anor v Kotzman & Ors [2009] VSC 311 (31 July 2009) – Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd & Anor v Kocak & Ors (2013) 252 CLR 480.…
-
Hart v Melbourne Underwater World Pty Ltd
[2018] VSC 394
Citation 35
(Para 1)
…f the ( Wrongs ) Act. His Honour proceeded to restate the general principles in the context of the ( Wrongs ) Act, as follows:[10] [5][2009] VSC 311, [24]-[28]. [6](2013) 42 VR 434, [49] 446-447. This is noted by Ierodiaconou AsJ in Adams v Wadesley [2018] VSC 304, [28]. [7][2009] VSC 311, [44]-[46]. [8]A corresp…
-
St Luke's Anglicare v Handrinos
[2018] VSC 356
Citation 36
(Para 1)
…ent’.[8] [7]The GEPIC was gazetted on 27 July 2006 and remains in force under s 67 of the WIRCA. [8] HJ Heinz Company Australia Ltd v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311, [27] (‘ HJ Heinz ’), applied in relation to GEPIC in YG-1 Australia Pty Ltd v Brann [2016] VSC 713, [54] (‘ YG-1’ ).…
-
Adams v Wadesley
[2018] VSC 304
Citation 37
(Para 1)
…sistency between the text in the Guides and an example which seeks to illustrate what is said in the text, the text will prevail’.[40] [40] Heinz [2009] VSC 311, [28] (Kyrou J).…
-
O'Brien v Brand
[2017] VSC 596
Citation 38
…[26][2009] VSC 311.…
-
Yg-1 Australia Pty Ltd v Dr Brann & Ors
[2016] VSC 713
Citation 39
(Para 13)
…rse of submissions, Counsel for the Employer outlined the purpose of the AMA Guides, and referred[81] to the case of H J Heinz & Anor v Kotzman & Ors [2009] VSC 311 (‘ H J Heinz ’)[82] in which Kyrou J noted as follows: [24] The interpretation of the Guides is a question of law. The determination of the level of…
-
Leemark Fire Protection Pty Ltd v Malios
[2014] VSC 654
Citation 40
(Para 1)
…processes and criteria set out in the Guides for the relevant condition, body part or system.’[10] [10] HJ Heinz Company Australia Ltd v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311, [45] (Kyrou J).…
-
Kowal v O'Day
[2014] VSC 347
Citation 41
…[22][2009] VSC 311 [24]–[28], approved in Vic WorkCover Authority v Elsdon [2013] VSCA 235 [49].…
-
Hatswell v Victoria
[2013] VSC 262
Citation 42
…[13][2009] VSC 311 (31 July 2009) (‘ Heinz ’).…
-
Lingenberg v Gallichio
[2013] VSC 207
Citation 43
(Para 1)
…v Kotzman, [5] I summarised the general principles for interpreting the Guides and the provisions of the AC Act relating to the Guides as follows: [5][2009] VSC 311 (31 July 2009) (‘ Heinz ’).…
-
Saddington v Kotzman
[2013] VSC 196
Citation 44
(Para 1)
…Compensation Act 1985 . Those principles are equally applicable to the Act. In the context of the Act, the principles may be restated as follows. [7][2009] VSC 311 (31 July 2009) (‘ Heinz ’).…
-
Summers v Director of Housing
[2012] VSC 395
Citation 45
…[44][2009] VSC 311, [24]-[28]. Footnotes reproduced from original.…
-
Elsdon v Victorian WorkCover Authority
[2012] VSC 347
Citation 46
(Para 1)
…ely mirroring the legal debate concerning the proper construction of Structural Inclusion (2). [7] Heinz Company Australia Ltd & Anor v Kotzman & Ors [2009] VSC 311 [24]-[28].…
-
Chua v Lowthian
[2011] VSC 468
Citation 47
(Para 1)
…e other provisions of the Division,[25] which relevantly include s 28LL(3) to which I shall shortly come. [25] Cf H J Heinz Company Limited v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311 (‘ H J Heinz ’); Alcoa Holdings Ltd & Anor v Lowthian & ors and De Haas [2011] VSC 245 (‘ Alcoa ’).…
-
Alcoa Holdings Ltd v Lowthian
[2011] VSC 245
Citation 48
…urer’s lawyers dated 17 March 2010 together with a copy of a decision of His Honour Kyrou J in H J Heinz Company Australia Ltd & Or v Kotzman & Ors [2009] VSC 311. The Panel notes paragraph 5.4 of the self-insurer’s submission to the Panel states “…that the AMA Guides also requires that an estimate is made of the…
-
Collins v Eaton
[2011] VSC 71
Citation 49
(Para 1)
…if the panel asked itself, in effect, the wrong question, or misapplied the relevant test.[1] [1]See for example H J Heinz Co Australia Ltd v Kotzman [2009] VSC 311 at [24].…
-
Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical Pty Ltd
[2010] VSC 611
Citation 50
(Para 1)
…ciples applicable to such a review see generally: Clark v National Mutual Life Insurance Limited [2007] VSC 341 and HJ Heinz & Or v Kotzman & Ors [2009] VSC 311.…