-
Vicinity Centres PM Pty Ltd v Arik
[2023] VSCA 295
Citation 1
(Para 5)
…Guides with legalistic interpretation. [52]Ibid [121], citing Elworthy [2007] VSC 48, [20]–[21]. [53]Citing Gillat v Transport Accident Commission [2003] VSC 15, [47] (Nettle J).…
-
Paschalis v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia
[2021] SASCFC 44
Citation 2
(Para 10)
…ent Commission (1999) 15 VAR 414, [30]; aff’d and reasons adopted in Barnett v Transport Accident Commission (2001) 34 MVR 26. [53] Gillat v Transport Accident Commission (2003) 38 MVR 463, [27]. [54] Transport Accident Commission v Elworthy [2007] VSC 48, [20]. [55] State Trustees Ltd v Transport Accident Commission (2002) 6 VR 359, [25]. [56…
-
Frkic v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia (No 2)
[2020] SASCFC 59
Citation 3
(Para 28)
…rt Accident Commission (1999) 15 VAR 414, [30] (Mandie J); H J Heinz Company Australia Pty Ltd v Kotzman (2009) 31 VAR 206, [24]-[28] (Kyrou J). [11] Gillat v Transport Accident Commission (2003) 19 VAR 376, [27] (Nettle J).…
-
Victorian WorkCover Authority v Elsdon
[2013] VSCA 235
Citation 4
(Para 1)
…ion [1998] 1 VR 616, 621; Transport Accident Commission v Elworthy [2007] VSC 48, [21]. [34]See s 91(1)(b) and Gillat v Transport Accident Commission [2003] VSC 15.…
-
Hart v Melbourne Underwater World Pty Ltd
[2018] VSC 394
Citation 5
…t Accident Commission (1999) 15 VAR 414, 429–30 [30]; aff’d and reasons adopted in Barnett v Transport Accident Commission (2001) 34 MVR 26. [12] Gillat v Transport Accident Commission (2003) 38 MVR 463, 469 [27] (‘ Gillat ’).…
-
Kipniak Pty Ltd v Rann
[2017] VSC 651
Citation 6
(Para 1)
…s’.[11] [9](2009) 31 VAR 206, 211 [24] (‘ Heinz ’). See also Barnett v Transport Accident Commission (1999) 15 VAR 414 [30] and Gillat v Transport Accident Commission (2003) 19 VAR 376 [27]. This approach should be taken as directly applicable to the GEPIC in the absence of any compelling argument to the contrary: YG-1 Australia Pty Ltd v Dr B…
-
Higgins Nine Group Pty Ltd v Ladro Greville St Pty Ltd
[2016] VSC 244
Citation 7
…(an appeal was dismissed: Barnett v Transport Accident Commission (2001) 17 VAR 339); State Trustees v Transport Accident Commission [2000] VSC 494; Gillat v Transport Accident Commission (2003) 19 VAR 376; Transport Accident Commission v Lincoln (2003) 6 VR 199.…
-
Saddington v Kotzman
[2013] VSC 196
Citation 8
(Para 1)
…rt Accident Commission (1999) 15 VAR 414, 429–30 [30]; aff’d and reasons adopted in Barnett v Transport Accident Commission (2001) 34 MVR 26. [9] Gillat v Transport Accident Commission (2003) 38 MVR 463, 469 [27] (‘ Gillat ’).…
-
Summers v Director of Housing
[2012] VSC 395
Citation 9
…[46] Gillat v Transport Accident Commission (2003) 38 MVR 463; [2003] VSC 15, [27].…
-
Transport Accident Commission v Serwylo
[2010] VSC 421
Citation 10
…C 484, [30] (Mandie J); affirmed on appeal Barnett v Transport Accident Commission [2001] VSCA 12. [5] Gillat v Transport Accident Commission [2003] VSC 15, [27] (Nettle J). [6] Gillat v Transport Accident Commission , [47]; Transport Accident Commission v Elworthy [2007] VSC 48, [20]. [7] Lake v Transport Accid…
-
Nicholls v Corlett
[2010] VSC 115
Citation 11
…Accident Commission (2001) 34 MVR 26; [2001] VSCA 12. [19] Gillat v Transport Accident Commission (2003) 38 MVR 463; [2003] VSC 15, [27] (‘ Gillat ’). [20] Transport Accident Commission v Elworthy [2007] VSC 48, [20] (‘ Elworthy ’). [21] State Trustees Ltd v Transport Accident Commission (2002) 6 VR 359, 365 [2…
-
HJ Heinz Company Australia Ltd v Kotzman
[2009] VSC 311
Citation 12
(Para 1)
…adopted in Barnett v Transport Accident Commission (2001) 34 MVR 26; [2001] VSCA 12. [3] Gillat v Transport Accident Commission (2003) 38 MVR 463; [2003] VSC 15, [27] (‘ Gillat ’).…
-
Transport Accident Commission v Elworthy
[2007] VSC 48
Citation 13
(Para 1)
…mation to justify the estimate of impairment.” Thus the use of the Guides is designed to promote precision, certainty and consistency. [2][2003] VSC 15 at [47]; 38 MVR 463 at 473.…
-
Lucas v Transport Accident Commission
[2003] VSC 97
Citation 14
…Tribunal is not bound to accept the evidence of a particular expert before it. As Nettle J stated in Gillat v Transport Accident Commission [13]: [13][2003] VSC 15 "The section does not say in terms that the Commission must adopt an assessment prepared by a practitioner who has successfully completed the course.…