High Court Bulletin

Link copied
Case Copied 39 min read

High Court Bulletin

Produced by the Legal Research Officer,
High Court of Australia Library


[2017] HCAB 8 (1 November 2017)

A record of recent High Court of Australia cases: decided, reserved for judgment, awaiting hearing in the Court’s original jurisdiction, granted special leave to appeal, refused special leave to appeal and not proceeding or vacated

1: Summary of New Entries
2: Cases Handed Down
3: Cases Reserved
4: Original Jurisdiction
5: Special Leave Granted
6: Cases Not Proceeding or Vacated
7: Special Leave Refused

1: Summary of New Entries

2: Cases Handed Down

Case

Title

Brown & Anor v The State of Tasmania

Constitutional Law

Wilkie v The Commonwealth; Australian Marriage Equality Ltd v Cormann

Constitutional Law

Re Canavan; Re Ludlam; Re Waters; Re Roberts (No 2); Re Joyce; Re Nash; Re Xenophon

Court of Disputed Returns

Director of Public Prosecutions v Dalgliesh (A Pseudonym)

Criminal Law

Koani v The Queen

Criminal Law

BRF038 v The Republic of Nauru

Migration

3: Cases Reserved

Case

Title

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union & Anor

Industrial Law

DWN042 v The Republic of Nauru

Migration

4: Original Jurisdiction

Case

Title

Alley v Gillespie

Constitutional Law

5: Special Leave Granted

Case

Title

Cecil v Director of Public Prosecutions (Nauru); Kepae v Director of Public Prosecutions (Nauru); Jeremiah v Director of Public Prosecutions (Nauru)

Criminal Law

DL v The Queen

Criminal Law

The Queen v Falzon

Criminal Law

Ancient Order of Foresters in Victoria Friendly Society Limited v Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Limited & Anor

Equity

Traljesic v Bosnia and Herzegovina & Anor

Extradition

SAS Trustee Corporation v Miles

Interpretation

The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v Thomas; The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v Martin Andrew Pty Ltd; The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v Thomas Nominees Pty Ltd; The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v Thomas

Taxation

6: Cases Not Proceeding or Vacated

Case

Title

ResourceCo Material Solutions Pty Ltd & Anor v State of Victoria & Anor

Constitutional Law

2: Cases Handed Down

The following cases were handed down by the High Court of Australia during the October 2017 sittings.

Constitutional Law

Brown & Anor v The State of Tasmania

H3/2016: [2017] HCA 43

Judgment delivered: 18 October 2017

Coram: Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon and Edelman JJ

Catchwords:

Constitutional law (Cth) – Implied freedom of political communication – Workplaces (Protection from Protesters) Act 2014 (Tas) – Where Act empowers police officers to direct protesters to leave and stay away from business premises and business access areas under pain of arrest and criminal penalties – Where business premises include forestry land – Where Act allows police officers to give such directions if they reasonably believe protester is preventing, hindering or obstructing business activity, has done so, or is about to do so – Where Forestry Tasmania authorised to undertake forest operations in Lapoinya Forest – Where plaintiffs protested in vicinity of forest…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read High Court Bulletin and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2017] HCAB 8
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Brown & Anor v The State of Tasmania, the High Court considered whether the Workplaces (Protection from Protesters) Act 2014 (Tas) restricted otherwise lawful protest activity and whether it imposed an impermissible burden on the implied freedom of political communication. The Court held that the Act did restrict lawful protest activity and that it imposed an impermissible burden on the implied freedom of political communication. In Wilkie & Ors v The Commonwealth & Ors; Australian Marriage Equality Ltd & Anor v Cormann & Anor, the Court considered whether the Finance Minister had the authority to make a determination under the Appropriation Act (No 1) 2017-2018 (Cth) to provide funding for a postal survey. The Court held that the Finance Minister did not have the authority to make such a determination. In Re Canavan; Re Ludlam; Re Waters; Re Roberts (No 2); Re Joyce; Re Nash; Re Xenophon, the Court considered whether certain senators were incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or member of the House of Representatives due to holding dual citizenship at the time of their nomination for election. The Court held that the senators were not incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or member of the House of Representatives.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.