High Court Bulletin

Link copied
Case Copied 31 min read

High Court Bulletin

Produced by the Legal Research Officer,
High Court of Australia Library


[2020] HCAB 7 (11 September 2020)

A record of recent High Court of Australia cases: decided, reserved for judgment, awaiting hearing in the Court’s original jurisdiction, granted special leave to appeal, refused special leave to appeal and not proceeding or vacated

1: Summary of New Entries
2: Cases Handed Down
3: Cases Reserved
4: Original Jurisdiction
5: Section 40 Removal
6: Special Leave Granted
7: Cases Not Proceeding or Vacated
8: Special Leave Refused

1: Summary of New Entries

2: Cases Handed Down

Case

Title

Private R v Brigadier Michael Cowen & Anor

Constitutional Law

Applicant S270/2019 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

Immigration

3: Cases Reserved

Case

Title

GBF v The Queen

Criminal Law

The Queen v Abdirahman-Khalif

Criminal Law

Roy v O’Neill

Evidence

Clayton v Bant

Family Law

AUS17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

Migration Law

Minister for Home Affairs & Ors v DMA18 as Litigation Guardian for DLZ18 & Anor; Minister for Home Affairs & Anor v Marie Theresa Arthur as Litigation Representative for BXD18; Minister for Home Affairs & Anor v FRX17 as Litigation Representative for FRM17; Minister for Home Affairs & Anor v DJA18 as Litigation Representative for DIZ18

Migration Law

Deguisa & Anor v Lynn & Ors

Real Property

4: Original Jurisdiction

Case

Title

LibertyWorks Inc v Commonwealth of Australia

Constitutional Law

Palmer & Anor v The State of Western Australia & Anor

Constitutional Law

5: Section 40 Removal

6: Special Leave Granted

Case

Title

Victoria International Container Terminal Limited v Lunt & Ors

Civil Procedure

Matthew Ward Price and Daniel James Price as Executors of the Estate of Alan Leslie Price (Deceased) & Ors v Christine Claire Spoor as Trustee & Ors

Contracts

Davidson v The Queen

Evidence

DQU16 & Ors v Minister for Home Affairs & Anor

Migration Law

7: Cases Not Proceeding or Vacated

8: Special Leave Refused

2: Cases Handed Down

The following cases were handed down by the High Court of Australia during the September 2020 sittings.

Constitutional Law

Private R v Brigadier Michael Cowen & Anor

S272/2019: [2020] HCA 31

Judgment delivered: 9 September 2020

Coram: Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon and Edelman JJ

Catchwords:

Constitutional law (Cth)

– Defence – Military discipline – Where plaintiff charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm – Where plaintiff and complainant members of Australian Defence Force at time of alleged conduct – Where neither plaintiff nor complainant on duty or in uniform – Where plaintiff charged under s 61(3) of Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth) – Where s 61(3) provided defence member guilty of offence if engaged in conduct outside Jervis Bay Territory and that conduct would constitute Territory offence if it took place in Jervis Bay Territory – Where plaintiff's conduct also constituted offence under ordinary criminal law and civil courts available – Where plaintiff challenged jurisdiction of Defence Force magistrate to hear charge – Whether s 51(vi) of Constitution

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read High Court Bulletin and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] HCAB 7
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Private R v Brigadier Michael Cowen & Anor, the High Court dismissed the applicant's constitutional writ application. The applicant, a member of the Australian Defence Force, was charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm and challenged the jurisdiction of a Defence Force magistrate to hear the charge. The Court held that section 51(vi) of the Constitution supported the conferral of jurisdiction by the Defence Force Discipline Act upon a service tribunal to hear the charge. In the case of Applicant S270/2019 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, the High Court dismissed the appeal and held that the Minister was not obliged to consider whether non-refoulement obligations were owed to the appellant when exercising power under s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth). The Court held that the appeal was without merit and dismissed it with costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.