Klein v Mochkin [No 2]
[2024] VSCA 223
Citation 1
(Para 2)
…The principles relevant to this Court’s jurisdiction to grant a stay of its orders pending an application to the High Court for special leave to appeal were set out by this Court in Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd .[11] Relevantly, those principles may be summarised as follows: [11][2018] VSCA…
Piety Developments Pty Ltd v Cumberland City Council (No 2)
[2024] NSWCA 196
Citation 2
(Para 28)
…The approach in Burgundy Royale has been adopted consistently by the High Court in considering such applications: see, for example Edelsten v Ward (No 2) (1988) 63 ALJR 346 at 347 (Brennan J); Gerah Imports Pty Ltd v Duke Group Ltd (in liq) [1994] HCA 3; 68 ALJR 196 at 197 (Dawson J); Haydon v Chive…
Gujic & Arterbury (No 2)
[2024] FedCFamC1A 58
Citation 3
(Para 11)
…In Edelsten v Ward (No 2) (1988) 63 ALJR 346, Brennan J expanded on that proposition saying at 346: [The jurisdiction] is one which can only be exercised in extraordinary circumstances. It is as well to emphasise that observation again lest the impression be created that, in the conduct of litigatio…
Hoser v Pelley [No 4]
[2023] VSCA 319
Citation 4
(Para 2)
…The principles relevant to this Court’s jurisdiction to grant a stay of its orders pending an application to the High Court for special leave to appeal were set out by this Court in Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd .[4] Relevantly, those principles may be summarised as follows: [4][2018] VSCA 3…
Waite v Alcoa of Australia Ltd
[2020] WASCA 1
Citation 5
(Para 2)
…Whether the evidence ought to have been accepted as sufficient to establish a fact, is itself a question of fact: Clark v Flanagan ;[139] Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd ;[140] McPhee v S Bennett Ltd ;[141] Warley Pty Ltd v Adco Constructions Pty Ltd ;[142] Edelsten v Ward (No 1) ;[143] Ambula…
Huang v Drumm (No 3)
[2019] NSWCA 117
Citation 6
(Para 14)
…This approach has been adopted consistently by the High Court in considering such applications: see, for example Edelsten v Ward (No 2) (1988) 63 ALJR 346 at 347 (Brennan J); Gerah Imports Pty Ltd v The Duke Group (in liq) [1994] HCA 3; 68 ALJR 196 at 197 (Dawson J); Haydon v Chivell [1999] HCA 39 a…
Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd
[2019] VSCA 17
Citation 7
(Para 1)
…There is nothing in Smith or any other authority upon which the applicants have relied[8] that is inconsistent with the above analysis. In Smith , the High Court granted the appellant special leave to appeal and a stay of the primary order — that his name be removed from the roll of barristers —upon…
Christian v Société Des Produits Nestlé SA
[2015] FCA 1341
Citation 8
(Para 9)
…His Honour referred to the earlier decision in Marconi’s Wireless Telegraph Company Limited v Commonwealth (No 3) (1913) 16 CLR 384 at 386 where the Court held that it would not ordinarily grant an application for a stay of that kind unless very strong and special grounds were shown. In Edelsten v W…
Legal Practitioners Conduct Board v Viscariello (No 2)
[2013] SASCFC 47
Citation 9
(Para 20)
…Counsel for the Board drew attention to several authorities addressing the circumstances in which a stay may be granted pending special leave.[17] The Court was taken to the judgment of Brennan J in Jennings Construction Limited v Burgundy Royale Investments Proprietary Limited where his Honour obse…
Rinehart v Welker
[2012] NSWCA 1
Citation 10
(Para 1)
…In Edelsten v Ward (No 2) (1988) 63 ALJR 346, Brennan J again emphasised the extraordinary nature of the jurisdiction to grant a stay and that something quite exceptional must be shown before the stay jurisdiction is exercised. His Honour added the following remarks (at 347):…
Sherd v The Queen
[2011] ACTCA 17
Citation 11
(Para 1)
…Despite this, the High Court has expressed on a number of occasions concern about whether a grant of bail shows some provisionality about a conviction and, by extension, about a sentence. See, for example, Markovina v The Queen (1998) 72 ALJR 1522 (at 1523) per Hayne J, and Chew v The Queen (1991) 6…
Croker v Commonwealth of Australia
[2011] FCA 312
Citation 12
(Para 8)
…But whatever may be the source of the power, it is well recognised that an application of the present kind pending an application for special leave to appeal may be made – and is most appropriately made – to this Court and not the High Court: cf. Jennings Construction Ltd v Burgundy Royale Investmen…
Jamine & Jamine (No 2)
[2010] FamCAFC 133
Citation 13
(Para 4)
…Such an order extending the time of effect of a divorce order might well be considered to be in the nature of an order staying an order which is subject to an appeal. The authorities in relation to the grant of such a stay emphasise the need to ensure preservation of the subject matter of the appeal…
CHILDS & CHILDS
[2010] FamCAFC 35
Citation 14
(Para 4)
…In his submissions, the wife’s counsel noted that an order for a stay or an order dismissing or refusing a stay is a highly discretionary matter. We were referred to the recent decision of the Full Court in Gull & Gull (Stay Application) [2009] FamCAFC 104 where in paragraphs 9 and 10 the Full Court…
Wilder and Child Support Registrar (No. 4)
[2009] FamCAFC 175
Citation 15
(Para 3)
…In Edelsten v Ward (No. 2) (1988) 63 ALJR 346, Brennan J, emphasising the “exceptional” character of the Court's inherent jurisdiction to preserve the subject matter of litigation pending the making of a special leave application, said at 346: [This jurisdiction] is one which can only be exercised i…
Halsbury and Halsbury (Stay Application)
[2009] FamCAFC 142
Citation 16
(Para 9)
…The jurisdiction invoked in an application for special leave has been described as “extraordinary” and the need for “exceptional circumstances” to be demonstrated before the granting of stay pending such an application are discussed in the authorities – see particularly Burgundy Royale ; Ampolex Ltd…
Gull & Gull (Stay Application)
[2009] FamCAFC 104
Citation 17
(Para 1)
…The matters to be considered in relation to whether a stay should be granted have been explained by the High Court on a number of occasions and were conveniently summarised for our purposes in the judgment of Beaumont J in Petrotimor Companhia de Petroleos SARL v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] FCA…
New Zealand v Moloney
[2006] FCA 1363
Citation 18
(Para 3)
…New Zealand, by its counsel, has confirmed that, in accordance with the requirements of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth), the respondents will not be removed to New Zealand before any timely application which they may make for special leave to appeal to the High Court is heard and determined. I theref…
SA Govt Financing Authority v Bank New Zealand & BT Aust (HK) Ltd No. Scciv-99-1428
[2002] SASC 49
Citation 19
(Para 12)
…In declining to grant a stay, Dawson J said: “The inherent jurisdiction of this court to order a stay of proceedings pending the determination of an application for special leave is well established. It is an extraordinary jurisdiction which will only be exercised in exceptional circumstances. Excep…
Guss v Johnstone
[2000] FCA 1593
Citation 20
(Para 7)
…In Jennings Construction Ltd v Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd (No 1) (1986) 161 CLR 681, Brennan J observed (at 684) that a “stay to preserve the subject-matter of litigation pending an application for special leave to appeal is an extraordinary jurisdiction and exceptional circumstances must b…
Bryant v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
[1996] HCA 3
Citation 21
…8 See Edelsten v Richmond (1987) 11 NSWLR 51 at 59, 63, 64; McMahon v Gould (1982) 7 ACLR 202; 1 ACLC 98; Dwyer v National Companies and Securities Commission (1988) 15 NSWLR 285 at 287; Sibuse Pty Ltd v Shaw (No 2) (1988) 13 NSWLR 125 at 127-128. See also Edelsten v Ward (No 2) (1988) 63 ALJR 346 a…
Beljajev v Director of Public Prosecutions
[1991] HCA 16
Citation 22
…10. In Edelsten v. Ward (No. 2) (1988) 63 ALJR 346, I said that the jurisdiction can be exercised only in extraordinary circumstances and added:…
AB (A Pseudonym) v The Queen
[2018] HCATrans 134
Citation 23
…The principles informing the discretion to grant a stay in this Court are not in dispute. Justice Brennan emphasised in Edelsten v Ward (No 2) (1988) 63 ALJR 346 that the jurisdiction of this Court to grant a stay to preserve the subject matter of litigation pending the making of an application for …
Ying v Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited
[2015] HCATrans 165
Citation 24
…It is well known an applicant for a stay has the burden of persuading the Court that it should be granted: see Advanced Building Systems Pty Ltd v Ramset Fasteners (Aust) Pty Ltd (1997) 71 ALJR 814 at 815. Where special leave has not yet been obtained, as is the position here, it is an exceptional j…
Jordan (a pseudonym) v Secretary of Department of Home Affairs
[2023] FedCFamC2G 515
Citation 25
(Para 13)
…The Respondent contended that the scope of the procedural power does not extend to granting substantive relief to a person not entitled to that relief at law. It emphasised that it is only appropriate to exercise the broad discretion to grant a stay in extraordinary circumstances and not to secure t…
Yallingup Residents Association (Inc) v State Administrative Tribunal
[2006] WASC 52
Citation 26
…Apollo Shower Screens Pty Ltd & Anor v Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Corporation [1985] 1 NSWLR 561 Blatch v Archer (1774) 98 ER 969 Branch V Lawrence & Ors [2003] WASC 124 Edelsten v Ward (No 2) (1988) 63 ALJR 346 Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v Lovell (No 2) (1998) 20 WAR 79 St…
Bunnings Forest Products P/L v Bullen, E.g
[1994] FCA 940
Citation 27
…Jennings Construction Ltd v. Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd (No. 1) (1986) 161 CLR 681 Allanson v. Midland Credit Ltd (1977) 16 ALR 43 Smith Kline and French Laboratories (Australia) Ltd v. Secretary, Department of Community Services and Health (1991) 99 ALR 417 McBride v. Sandland (1918) 25 CL…
Comcare v A'Hearn
[1993] FCA 498
Citation 28
…Edelsten v. Ward (No. 2) (1988) 63 ALJR 346…
Huebel v Epworth Foundation (trading as Epworth Hospital)
[2003] VSC 507
Citation 29
(Para 1)
…Care must be taken in cases such as the present not to fall into the trap of inverting the onus of proof. I should say that Azzopardi has been referred to as being probably correct by the Chief Justice of the High Court in refusing a special leave application in Edelsten v. Ward (No.1) (1988) 63 ALJ…