FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chameleon Mining NL v Murchison Metals Limited [2010] FCA 1129
Citation: Chameleon Mining NL v Murchison Metals Limited [2010] FCA 1129 Parties: CHAMELEON MINING NL
v MURCHISON METALS LIMITED
(ACN 078 257 799),
PHILLIP FELICE GRIMALDI,
GREGORY BENNETT BARNES,
CROSSLANDS RESOURCES LTD
(ACN 061 262 397),
PINNACLE NOMINEES PTY LTD
(ACN 008 928 443) and
JACK HILLS HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 127 384 696)File number(s): NSD 2355 of 2007 Judge: JACOBSON J Date of judgment: 20 October 2010 Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – directors’ duties – whether company officer a de facto director - five extraordinary transactions – whether transactions in breach of directors’ duties – whether another entity knowingly concerned in breaches – Corporations Act remedies – indemnification of officers in breach of duties
EQUITY – directors’ duties – whether company officer a de facto director – five extraordinary transactions – whether transactions in breach of directors’ duties – whether another entity liable for breaches as accessory under the first and second limbs of Barnes v Addy – equitable remedies considered – no constructive trust over shares – nature of benefit or profit – account of profits ordered
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 9, 180, 181, 182, 710, 711, 728
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 136, 140
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 54A
Federal Court Rules O 22 r 4(2)Cases cited: Advance Bank Australia Limited v FAI Insurances Limited (1987) 9 NSWLR 464 cited
Albion Insurance Co v GIO (NSW) (1969) 121 CLR 342 cited
Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 referred to
Australian Postal Corp v Lutak (1991) 21 NSWLR 584 cited
Australian Securities Commission v AS Nominees (1995) 133 ALR 1 cited
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Ltd (No 4) (2007) 160 FCR 35 cited
Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 followed
Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (1993) 43 FCR 1 applied
Beatty v Guggenheim Exploration Co (1919) 225 NY 380 cited
Blackwell v Moray (1991) 5 ACSR 255 cited
Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46 cited
Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 cited
Burke v LFOT Pty Limited (2002) 209 CLR 282 referred to
Chan v Zacharia (1984) 154 CLR 178 cited
Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Ltd (No 4) (2007) 160 FCR 35 cited
Baden v Societe Generale pour Favoriser le Developpement du Commerce et de L’Industrie en France SA [1993] 1 WLR 509 followed
Canson Enterprises Ltd v Boughton [1996] 1 WWR 412 discussed
Cement Australia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2010] FCAFC 101 referred to
Chew v R (1992) 173 CLR 626 cited
Colbeam Palmer Limited v Stock Affiliates Pty Limited (1968) 122 CLR 25 discussed
Commissioner of Taxation v Macquarie Health Corp Limited (1998) 88 FCR 451 cited
Consul Development Pty Limited v DPC Estates Pty Limited (1975) 132 CLR 373 discussed
Corporate Affairs Commission v Drysdale (1978) 141 CLR 236 discussed
Coulton…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Chameleon Mining NL v Murchison Metals Limited and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2010] FCA 1129
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues revolved around the identification and characterisation of the transactions, whether these transactions constituted breaches of directors' duties, and if Murchison Metals Limited or any associated entities could be held liable for any such breaches. The court had to determine if certain individuals acted as de facto directors and whether they owed fiduciary duties to Chameleon Mining NL. Additionally, the court examined whether any other entity was knowingly involved in any breaches of directors' duties.
The Federal Court found that some transactions were indeed irregular and that certain individuals acted as de facto directors, thereby incurring personal liability for breaches of their fiduciary duties. The court held that Murchison Metals Limited and associated entities were not liable as accessories under the first and second limbs of Barnes v Addy, but ordered an account of profits to address the improper gains realised from the transactions. The court's decision highlighted the importance of directors' duties and the potential personal liability for those who act as de facto directors. The court granted leave for Chameleon Mining NL to file a Fourth Further Amended Statement of Claim and directed the parties to prepare short minutes of order reflecting the court's reasons. The matter was also set for a brief hearing on the issue of costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Leave is granted to the Applicant to file and serve a Fourth Further Amended Statement of Claim in the form annexed to the Applicant’s Notice of Motion filed 6 October 2010.
2.
The parties bring in short minutes of order to reflect the reasons for judgment herein.
3.
The parties be heard briefly on the question of costs.
Note:
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.