DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
REGISTRY: BRISBANE
NUMBER: 2111 of 1999
Plaintiff:
LYNNE BROOK
First Defendant:
JOAN McDERMOTT & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD
Second Defendant:
JOAN McDERMOTT
REASONS FOR JUDGEMENT
DELIVERED the fourteenth day of April, 2000.
This matter has had a long, somewhat convoluted, history. I shall refer to part of that
history later. The trial eventually came on before me for hearing on Monday, 20th September,
1999. Counsel concluded their final addresses at 4.20 pm on Friday, 1st October, 1999. The
pleadings, which have been much amended, are lengthy, and raise numerous issues for my
determination.
The story behind the litigation is, however, a fairly simple one. The second defendant
- whom I shall hereafter refer to as either the second defendant or as “McDermott” - has had
many years experience in the recruitment and management consultancy business. Prior to
1995 she had worked in this business as the Queensland managing partner of an organisation
referred to as the “Intek Group.” Following some differences with the other members of that
organisation she left the Intek Group, and established the first defendant (which I shall refer to as the first defendant or as “the defendant company”) to continue her work in Queensland.
As I understand it, she and the defendant company retained the Queensland clients of the Intek
Group. The defendant company operated from premises on the Gold Coast which were
referred to as “serviced offices,” leased - for six months - from a company referred to as
Servcorp. In November, 1995 the defendant company advertised in the Gold Coast Bulletin,
seeking two “professional recruitment consultants.”
The plaintiff - whom I shall hereafter refer to as either the plaintiff or Brook - was in
late 1995 employed as a an operations manager by Ashtons Removals. In November of that
year she saw the advertisement placed by the first defendant. She made application for the
position, and was, after a couple of interviews, appointed to a position with the second
defendant which was designated “senior recruitment consultant.” She resigned from her
employ with Ashtons Removals on 28th November, 1995, and commenced her new position
with the first defendant on Tuesday, 5th December, 1995. On that day she signed a document
headed “Offer of Appointment.” Notwithstanding the pleadings, the parties are now agreed
that that document (subject to the defendants’ application for rectification) sets out the basis
of the plaintiff’s employment by the first defendant.1
In June, 1996 the plaintiff was given the title “General Manager/Recruitment” by the
first defendant, and her base salary was increased.
The second defendant was a candidate for the office of Mayor of the Gold Coast in the
election of March, 1997. It is clear that her campaigning involved a considerable commitment
by her, at least so far as her time was concerned.
On 9th April, 1997 the plaintiff spoke with the second defendant, and her employment
was ended that day. The circumstances of her leaving are contentious.
The plaintiff then commenced working on her own behalf as…
Continue reading Algons Engineering Pty Ltd v Abigroup Contractors Pty Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Algons Engineering Pty Ltd v Abigroup Contractors Pty Ltd [2000] QDC 40
- Case
- [2000] QDC 40
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.