| WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION | |||
| DETERMINATION OF APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE COMMISSION CONSTITUTED BY AN ARBITRATOR | |||
| Status: Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeal filed on 30 October 2014 | |||
| CITATION: | StateCover Mutual Ltd v Cameron [2014] NSWWCCPD 49 | ||
| APPELLANT: | StateCover Mutual Ltd | ||
| FIRST RESPONDENT: | Rebecca Cameron | ||
| SECOND RESPONDENT: | AAI Ltd t/as GIO | ||
| EMPLOYER: | Greater Taree City Council | ||
| FILE NUMBER: | A1-559/13 | ||
| ARBITRATOR: | Mr B Batchelor | ||
| DATE OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISION: | 16 April 2014 | ||
| DATE OF APPEAL DECISION: | 4 August 2014 | ||
| SUBJECT MATTER OF DECISION: | Claim for lump sum death benefit; disease contracted by a gradual process; melanoma; whether Arbitrator erred in relying on hearsay evidence; Commission not bound by the rules of evidence; Pt 15 r 15.2 of the Workers Compensation Commission Rules 2011; whether employment a substantial contributing factor to the contraction of the disease; interpretation of special insurance provisions relating to occupational diseases; ss 4(b)(i), 15(1)(b) and 18(1) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987; relevance of s 151AB of Workers Compensation Act 1987 in a claim for workers’ compensation benefits | ||
| PRESIDENTIAL MEMBER: | Deputy President Bill Roche | ||
| HEARING: | On the papers | ||
| REPRESENTATION: | Appellant: | David Allen Legal | |
| First Respondent: Second Respondent: | Carroll & O’Dea Lawyers Thompson Cooper Lawyers | ||
| ORDERS MADE ON APPEAL: | 1. The Arbitrator’s determination of 16 April 2014 is confirmed. 2. The appellant, StateCover Mutual Ltd, is to pay the respondents’ costs of the appeal, as agreed or assessed. | ||
INTRODUCTION
This appeal concerns a claim for a lump sum death benefit under s 25 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (the 1987 Act). The basis of the claim is that the deceased worker died from skin cancer, a disease found to have been contracted in the course of his employment and to which his employment was a substantial contributing factor due to exposure to sunlight over several years of work outdoors with the relevant employer.
BACKGROUND
The applicant before the Arbitrator, Rebecca Cameron, who is the first respondent on appeal, is the eldest daughter of Alan Steere (the deceased) who died on 19 July 2011 from metastatic melanoma. She has claimed the lump sum death benefit as the deceased’s legal personal representative.
Greater Taree City Council (the Council) (and its predecessor, Manning Shire Council), employed the deceased between 6 May 1974 and 25 February 2011 (though he stopped working on 20 June 2008). Over that period, the deceased held the following positions with the Council:
(a) from 1974 to 1984 he worked as a crane driver on the bridge crew, working on bridge repairs and also curbing and guttering;
(b) from 1984 to 1986 he worked as the yardman/storeman at the Council depot;
(c) from 1986 to 1991 he worked as a senior storekeeper;
(d) from 1991 to 1999 he worked as the supervisor of central supply services, and
(e) from 1999 until he stopped work in 2008 he worked as a purchasing officer.
From 1983 until 2011, the Council had three insurers:
(a) from 31 December 1983 to 31 December 1986 – AAI Ltd t/as GIO (the…
Continue reading StateCover Mutual Ltd v Cameron
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- StateCover Mutual Ltd v Cameron [2014] NSWWCCPD 49
- Case
- [2014] NSWWCCPD 49
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included the validity of the Arbitrator's reliance on hearsay evidence, the extent to which the Commission is bound by the rules of evidence, and the interpretation of specific provisions of the Workers Compensation Act 1987. The appellant argued that the Arbitrator had erred in considering hearsay evidence and that the Commission was bound by the rules of evidence. Furthermore, the court had to determine whether the employment of the deceased was a substantial contributing factor to the contraction of melanoma, and how this related to the special insurance provisions for occupational diseases.
The court held that the Arbitrator was not bound by the rules of evidence and was entitled to consider all relevant evidence, including hearsay, under Pt 15 r 15.2 of the Workers Compensation Commission Rules 2011. The court further found that the Arbitrator had correctly considered the evidence and was satisfied that the employment was a substantial contributing factor to the deceased's melanoma. The interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 supported the Arbitrator's decision. The court concluded that s 151AB of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 was relevant in establishing the connection between the employment and the disease but did not affect the outcome in this case.
The appeal was dismissed, and the Arbitrator's determination was confirmed. The appellant was ordered to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal, as agreed or assessed.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The Arbitrator’s determination of 16 April 2014 is confirmed.
2. The appellant, StateCover Mutual Ltd, is to pay the respondents’ costs of the appeal, as agreed or assessed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.