SafeWork NSW v Parrish Group NSW Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 23 min read

District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v Parrish Group NSW Pty Ltd [2023] NSWDC 13
Hearing dates: 2 February 2023
Date of orders: 8 February 2023
Decision date: 08 February 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Russell SC DCJ
Decision:

(1)   Parrish Group NSW Pty Ltd is convicted.

(2)   The appropriate fine is $400,000 but that will be reduced by 25% to reflect the early plea of guilty.

(3)   Order Parrish Group NSW Pty Ltd to pay a fine of $300,000.

(4) Order pursuant to Section 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW) that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.

(5)   Order Parrish Group NSW Pty Ltd to pay the prosecutor’s costs agreed in the amount of $37,500.

(6) I request SafeWork NSW to send a copy of this judgment to the Minister with responsibility for workplace safety, who holds office in the next government.

Catchwords:

CRIMINAL LAW – prosecution – work health and safety – duty of persons undertaking business – risk of death or serious injury

SENTENCE – objective seriousness – mitigating factors – aggravating factors – plea of guilty – general deterrence – specific deterrence – capacity to pay appropriate penalty

COSTS – prosecution costs

OTHER – worker fell through inadequately protected penetration in roof

Legislation Cited:

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A, 22

Fines Act 1996 (NSW), ss 6, 122

Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW), ss 3, 14, 16, 19, 32

Cases Cited:

Baumer v R [1988] HCA 67; (1988) 166 CLR 51

Bulga Underground Operations Pty Limited v Nash [2016] NSWCCA 37; (2016) 93 NSWLR 338

BW v R [2011] NSWCCA 176

Capral Aluminium Limited v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2000] NSWIRComm 71; (2000) 49 NSWLR 610

Mahdi Jahandideh v The Queen [2014] NSWCCA 178

Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120

Nash v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Limited; Attorney General for NSW v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Limited [2017] NSWCCA 96

R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; (2006) 66 NSWLR 566

R v Wilkinson (No. 5) [2009] NSWSC 432

SafeWork NSW v LJW Solar Pty Ltd [2022] NSWDC 526

Unity Pty Limited v SafeWork NSW [2018] NSWCCA 266

Veen v The Queen (No. 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465

Texts Cited:

Safe Work Australia Safe Work on Roofs Information Sheet, January 2016.

WorkCover NSW Safe Work on Roofs Code of Practice, Part 1: Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 2009

SafeWork NSW Code of Practice Construction Work, April 2019

SafeWork NSW Managing the Risk of Falls Code of Practice, April 2019

Category:Sentence
Parties: SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor)
Parrish Group NSW Pty Ltd (Defendant)
Representation:

Counsel:
N Read (Prosecutor)
I Latham (Defendant)

Solicitors:
Department of Customer Service (Prosecutor)
Barry Nilsson (Defendant)
File Number(s): 2022/89793

Judgment

  1. On 31 March 2021 a risk to health and safety existed at a construction site in Kembla Grange where Parrish…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read SafeWork NSW v Parrish Group NSW Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2023] NSWDC 13
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

SafeWork NSW prosecuted Parrish Group NSW Pty Ltd following an incident where a worker fell through an inadequately protected penetration in the roof of a building under construction, resulting in serious injuries. The case was heard in the Local Court of New South Wales. The primary legal issues revolved around the duty of care owed by the defendant under work health and safety legislation, the objective seriousness of the offence, and the appropriate sentence to be imposed, including considerations of deterrence and the capacity of the defendant to pay. Additionally, the court had to determine the appropriate amount of prosecution costs to be awarded.

In addressing these issues, the court first acknowledged the gravity of the incident, noting that it involved a significant risk of death or serious injury. The court emphasised the importance of general and specific deterrence in sentencing, as well as the need to ensure that the penalty was sufficient to reflect the breach of duty. The plea of guilty was recognised as a mitigating factor, leading to a 25% reduction in the proposed fine. The court also considered the capacity of Parrish Group NSW Pty Ltd to pay the penalty, ultimately setting the fine at $300,000 after the discount. Furthermore, the court ordered that 50% of the fine be paid to the prosecutor and that the defendant cover agreed prosecution costs amounting to $37,500.

The court concluded that the sentence should serve both as a deterrent to the defendant and other businesses, and as a form of retribution for the harm caused. The judgment also highlighted the need for ongoing oversight and compliance with workplace safety regulations. Finally, the court requested that a copy of the judgment be sent to the Minister responsible for workplace safety, to ensure that appropriate actions are taken to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Parrish Group NSW Pty Ltd is convicted.

(2) The appropriate fine is $400,000 but that will be reduced by 25% to reflect the early plea of guilty.

(3) Order Parrish Group NSW Pty Ltd to pay a fine of $300,000.

(4) Order pursuant to Section 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW) that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.

(5) Order Parrish Group NSW Pty Ltd to pay the prosecutor’s costs agreed in the amount of $37,500.

(6) I request SafeWork NSW to send a copy of this judgment to the Minister with responsibility for workplace safety, who holds office in the next government.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.