District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v MACFIN Building Solutions Pty Ltd [2020] NSWDC 776 Hearing dates: 27 November 2020 Date of orders: 18 December 2020 Decision date: 18 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Strathdee DCJ Decision: (1) The defendant is convicted.
(2) The appropriate fine is $200,000.00 and that will be reduced by 25% to reflect a plea of guilty.
(3) Accordingly, I order defendant pay a fine of $150,000.00.
(4) Pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW), 50% of the fine imposed is to be paid to the prosecutor.
(5) I make no order as to costs.
Catchwords: CRIME – work health and safety – risk of death or serious injury – duty of person undertaking business
PROCEDURAL – reasonable practicability – likelihood of risk – knowledge of the risk – what the defendant ought reasonably have known
OTHER – fall from height in unprotected void – risk of the dangers posed by the void were known – failure to adequately implement work health and safety management system plan – inadequate fall protection
Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)
Fines Act 1996 (NSW)
Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)
Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Bulga Underground Operations v Nash [2016] NSWCCA 37; (2016) 93 NSWLR 338
Capral Aluminium Limited v WorkCover Authority of NSW [2000] NSWIRComm 71; (2000) 49 NSWLR 610
Environmental Protection Authority v Barnes [2006] NSWCCA 246
Fisher v Samaras Industries Pty Ltd (1996) 82 IR 384
Inspector Howard v BaulderstoneHornibrook Pty Ltd [2009] NSWIRComm 92
Kirk v Industrial Commission of New South Wales; Kirk Group Holdings Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Childs) (2010) 239 CLR 531; [2010] HCA 1
LawrensonDiecasting Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (1999) 90 IR 464
Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357
Morrison v Powercoal Pty Limited & Anor(No.3) [2005] NSWIRComm 61
Orbit Drilling v The Queen; Smith v The Queen [2012] VSCA 82
SafeWork NSW v Emu Group Pty Limited [2019] NSWDC 537
SafeWork NSW v HCM Building Pty Limited [2019] NSWDC 632
Veen v R (No. 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465
WorkCover Authority (NSW) v Profab Industries Pty Ltd (2000) 49 NSWLR 700
Texts Cited: SafeWork Australia Managing the Risk of Falls at the Workplace Code of Practice (April 2016)
WorkCover Preventing Falls in Housing Construction Code of Practice (July 2014)
Category: Sentence Parties: SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor)
MACFIN Building Solutions Pty Ltd (Defendant)Representation: Counsel: Ms S Callan SC with Mr Hawila (Prosecutor)
Solicitors: Ms B Ng, Department of Customer Service
Mr D Finlay (Company Director of Defendant - in person, unrepresented)
File Number(s): 2019/00178325 Publication restriction: Nil
-
JUDGMENT
-
On 31 August 2020, MACFIN Building…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read SafeWork NSW v MACFIN Building Solutions Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2020] NSWDC 776
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the legal principles surrounding the reasonable practicability of mitigating risks, the likelihood of the risk materialising, and the knowledge or what ought reasonably to have been known by the defendant. It was established that the risk of the dangers posed by the void were known to the defendant, and there was a failure to adequately implement the work health and safety management system plan, specifically in relation to fall protection. The court found that the defendant's actions constituted a breach of their duty, as they failed to take all reasonably practicable steps to ensure the safety of workers.
The defendant was convicted and fined $200,000.00, reduced by 25% due to the plea of guilty, resulting in a fine of $150,000.00. Under section 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW), 50% of the fine was to be paid to the prosecutor. The court did not make an order as to costs. This decision underscores the importance of adherence to work health and safety standards in construction sites to prevent serious injuries and fatalities.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) The defendant is convicted.
(2) The appropriate fine is $200,000.00 and that will be reduced by 25% to reflect a plea of guilty.
(3) Accordingly, I order defendant pay a fine of $150,000.00.
(4) Pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW), 50% of the fine imposed is to be paid to the prosecutor.
(5) I make no order as to costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.