-
NSW Commissioner of Police v Cottle
[2022] HCA 7
Citation 1
(Para 17)
…ion that the draftsman's train of thought, if logically pursued, would have led him to enact the exception"[73]. [70](2013) 252 CLR 1 at 31 [89]. [71](1963) 108 CLR 353. [72](1963) 108 CLR 353 at 358 (cleaned up). [73](1963) 108 CLR 353 at 358.…
-
Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council
[2020] NSWCA 106
Citation 2
(Para 32)
…avings Bank of South Australia (1939) 62 CLR 603 at 625 (Dixon J); [1939] HCA 40; Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 357 (Kitto, Taylor and Owen JJ); [1963] HCA 13.…
-
Radnor Enterprises Pty Ltd v Nicholls (as trustee of the Property of Boniface, a Bankrupt and Trustee of the Property of Ogston, a Bankrupt)
[2017] FCCA 2313
Citation 3
…] FCA 128 Re McLernon; Ex parte SWF Hoists and Industrial Equipment Pty Ltd v Prebble (1995) 58 FCR 391 Re Young; Ex parte Smith (1985) 5 FCR 204 Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 23; (2010) 241 CLR 252 Samootin v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2012] FCA 64 Sa…
-
Cong Phuong Van v The Queen
[2017] VSCA 149
Citation 4
…stralia v Newcastle and Hunter River Steamship Co Ltd [No 1] (1913) 16 CLR 591 at 624, cited in R v Rigby (1956) 100 CLR 146 at 151; and Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 358, which make clear the difference between implication and inference. In short the question is, What did the applicants mean by their words? Mor…
-
Kocic v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force
[2014] NSWCA 368
Citation 5
(Para 1)
…The language quoted in that passage was from Rose v Hvric [1963] HCA 13; 108 CLR 353 at 358. After referring further to the reasoning in Rose , the joint reasons in Ferdinands continued at [49]:…
-
Adam Saliba v Wissam Aziz
[2013] ACTCA 41
Citation 6
…ear before having such a conclusion. That intention will, of course, rarely be express. Indeed, as Kitto, Taylor and Owen JJ observed in Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 360, “ [e]x hypothesis there is no negation in words, but there must be a negation as a matter of meaning”. It seems to me quite clear that the in…
-
Commissioner of Police v Eaton
[2013] HCA 2
Citation 7
(Para 19)
…other provision concerned can be seen to mean more than it actually says; it may be contrasted with an inference[94]. [92](1963) 108 CLR 353 at 358; [1963] HCA 13. [93] Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 358; see also Public Service Association of New South Wales v Industrial Commission of New South Wales (1985…
-
Wissam Aziz v Adam Saliba
[2013] ACTSC 2
Citation 8
(Para 1)
…That intention will, of course, rarely be express. Indeed, as Kitto, Taylor and Owen JJ observed in Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 360, “[ e ] x hypothesis there is no negation in words, but there must be a negation as a matter of meaning”.…
-
Eaton v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
[2012] NSWCA 30
Citation 9
…(1998) 87 IR 1 Public Service Association v The Industrial Commission of New South Wales [1985] 1 NSWLR 627 Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40 Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 R v Wallis; Ex parte Employers Association of Wool Selling Brokers and Ors (1949) 78 CLR 529 Wang v Crestell Industries Pty Ltd (1997) 73 IR 454 Text…
-
Collins v Sydney Ports Corporation
[2012] NSWSC 115
Citation 10
…51 and if the sections are inconsistent the later would have full effect, even if the inconsistency only arose by necessary implication: Rose v Hvric [1963] HCA 13; 108 CLR 353, 357. Section 151G does not, in terms, deny recovery for this form of future economic loss and there is no necessary implication to that…
-
Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer v Gary Luke by his Tutor Matthew Charles Luke
[2011] NSWCA 251
Citation 11
(Para 1)
…51 and if the sections are inconsistent the later would have full effect, even if the inconsistency only arose by necessary implication: Rose v Hvric [1963] HCA 13, 108 CLR 353, 357. Section 151G does not, in terms, deny recovery for this form of future economic loss and there is no necessary implication to that…
-
Sydney Markets Ltd v Wilson
[2010] NSWADTAP 45
Citation 12
…ust be such conflict that the words necessarily “import a contradiction”: see Garnett v Bradley (1878) 3 App Cas 944 at 966; Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 360; Parramatta City Council v Stauffer Chemical Co (Aust) Pty Ltd [1971] 2 NSWLR 500 at 509; 3. Ordinarily, it will be assumed that Parliament means what it…
-
Wallace v Anson Holdings Pty Ltd
[2009] QLC 107
Citation 13
(Para 9)
…to whether one act was intended to stand in the place of another. [4] See Goodwin v Phillips (1908) 7 CLR 1 per Griffith CJ @ 7. [5] See Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 @ 360.…
-
Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxes (No 3)
[2007] NTSC 70
Citation 14
(Para 10)
…it from an implied repeal by a later Act: South-Eastern Drainage Board (SA) v The Savings Bank of South Australia (1939) 62 CLR 603; Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353.…
-
DPP v Le (No 2)
[2007] VSCA 57
Citation 15
…3A of the Confiscation Act 1997 from awarding costs to successful applicant for order excluding property from automatic forfeiture – Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 cited – Confiscation Act 1997, s 133A, Supreme Court Act 1986, s 24(1).…
-
The Queen v Whittington
[2007] NTCCA 2
Citation 16
…R 171 applied. Hamilton v Halesworth (1937) 58 CLR 369; Little v The Commonwealth (1947) 75 CLR 94; Trobridge v Hardy (1955) 94 CLR 147; Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353; Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598; Ferdinands v Commissioner for Public Employment (2006) 224 ALR 238, followed.…
-
Gacic v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd
[2006] NSWCA 175
Citation 17
…or impliedly said by the publisher: cf Lubrano v Gollin and Co Pty Ltd (1919) 27 CLR 113 at 118; Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 358. It is the reader’s (or listener’s or viewer’s) own conclusion.”…
-
Ferdinands v Commissioner for Public Employment
[2006] HCA 5
Citation 18
(Para 18)
…(1908) 7 CLR 1 at 7 per Griffith CJ; Butler v Attorney‑General (Vict) (1961) 106 CLR 268 at 276 per Fullagar J, 290 per Windeyer J; Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 360 per Kitto, Taylor and Owen JJ; Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1 at 17 per Gaudron J; Shergold v Tanner (2002) 209 CLR 126 at 136‑137 [34]‑[3…
-
Snow v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (No 2)
[2005] NSWADT 278
Citation 19
…308 Re Lawrence; Ex parte Goldbar Holdings Pty Ltd (1994) LGERA 113 Goodwin v Phillips (1908) 7 CLR 1 Mitchell v Scales (1907) 5 CLR 405 Rose v Hric (1963) 108 CLR 353 Saraswati v R (1991) 100 ALR 193 REPRESENTATION: In person B Baker, solicitor ORDERS: 1. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider the application fo…
-
Clarence Street Pty Ltd v Isis Projects Pty Ltd
[2005] NSWCA 391
Citation 20
…ade Practices Commission (1982) 39 ALR 565 Quasar Constructions NSW Pty Ltd v Demtech Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 116 Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 Walter Construction Group Ltd v CPL (Surry Hills) Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 266 PARTIES: CLARENCE STREET PTY LTD ISIS PROJECTS PTY LTD FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40736/2004 COUNSEL: Appell…
-
Bell v the State of Western Australia
[2004] WASCA 205
Citation 21
…R 345 Mitchell v Scales (1907) 5 CLR 405 Pirrie v McFarlane (1925) 36 CLR 170 Ringelstein v Redford Cattle Co Pty Ltd [1995] 1 Qd R 433 Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 Shergold v Tanner (2002) 209 CLR 126 South-Eastern Drainage Board (SA) v Savings Bank of South Australia (1939) 62 CLR 603 State Energy Commission of…
-
Gardiner v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
[2004] NSWSC 107
Citation 22
…unker v Perpetual Trustee Co (Ltd) (1937) 57 CLR 555 Costin v Costin (1997) 7 BPR 15,167 Lubrano v Gollin & Co Pty Ltd (1919) 27 CLR 113 Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Qld) v Hopkins (1945) 71 CLR 351 PARTIES : Cheryl Gardiner - Plaintiff/Appellant Chief Commissioner of State Revenue -…
-
HIH Casualty & General Insurance Ltd v Building Insurers' Guarantee Corporation
[2003] NSWSC 1083
Citation 23
…n of New South Wales (1985) 1 NSWLR 627 R v Credit Tribunal; ex parte General Motors Acceptance Corporation Australia (1977) 137 CLR 545 Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 Skandia American Reinsurance Corporation v Schenk 441 F Supp 715 (1977) Tariff Reinsurances Ltd v Commissioner of Taxes (Victoria) (1938) 59 CLR 194…
-
ISPT Nominees Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
[2003] NSWSC 697
Citation 24
…ation Commission v Vietnam Veterans' Association of Australia NSW Branch Inc (2000) 171 ALR 523 Rochefoucauld v Boustead [1897] 1 Ch 196 Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 Sarris v Penfolds Wines Ltd [1963] SR (NSW) 10 Saunders v Vautier (1841) 4 Beav 115 Re Sharpe [1980] 1 WLR 219 Re Applications of Shephard [1983] 1 N…
-
Travel Compensation Fund v Blair
[2003] NSWSC 720
Citation 25
…v Winneke; ex parte Gallagher (1982) 152 CLR 211 Registrar-General v Gill (New South Wales Court of Appeal, 16 August 1994, unreported) Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 Rutledge v Jaluit Pty Ltd (1991) 6 BPR 13,826 Saunders v Jones (1877) 7 Ch D 435 Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Ltd v St Martins Investments…
-
Marquet Clerk of the Parliaments of Western Australia v The Attorney-General of Western Australia
[2002] WASCA 277
Citation 26
…78) 3 App Cas 889 Rediffusion (Hong Kong) Ltd v Attorney‑General (Hong Kong) [1970] AC 1136 Riel v The Queen (1885) 10 App Cas 675 Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1 SGH Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 76 ALJR 780; [2002] HCA 18 South Australia v The Commonwealth (1942) 65 CL…
-
Capricornia Prospecting Pty Limited and 2 Ors v Donnelly and Mundine
[2002] NSWCA 254
Citation 27
…734 Thorpes Ltd v Grant Pastoral Co Pty Ltd (1954-55) 92 CLR 317 Butler v Attorney General for the State of Victoria (1961) 106 CLR 268 Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 Commercial Radio Coffs Harbour Limited v Fuller (1986) 161 CLR 47 Australian Gas Light Co v The Valuer General (1940) 40 NSWSR 126 NSW Associated Blu…
-
Fernandez v DPP
[2002] VSCA 115
Citation 28
…[31] Healey v. Festini (supra) was approved by the High Court in Rose v. Hvric (1963) 108 C.L.R. 353. Furthermore this Court in Rabel v. Eastern Energy Ltd. [1999] 3 V.R. 45 at 49 and in Kay v. Attorney-General (Vic.) (2000) 2 V.R. 436 at 444 concluded that a “necessary implication” would satisfy th…
-
Energy Brix Australia Corporation Pty Ltd v National Logistics Co-Ordinators (Morwell) Pty Ltd
[2002] VSCA 113
Citation 29
(Para 1)
…Various arguments were put to the Court to support the conclusion that by implication the legislature intended that there should be no further appeal beyond the application made to a judge of the Trial Division. Those should be looked at briefly later but essentially the question here is whether the…
-
Kathryn Ann Gault v Constable John Gerard Lawson
[2001] ACTSC 104
Citation 30
…1 NSWLR 282 Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 297 Goodwin v Phillips (1908) 7 CLR 1 Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 Re Applications of Shephard [1983] 1 NSWLR 96…
-
Goldie v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
[2001] FCA 1318
Citation 31
(Para 13)
…Those principles are expounded in cases such as: Goodwin v Phillips (1908) 7 CLR 1 at 7 per Griffith CJ and 10 per Barton J; Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 360; Butler v Attorney-General (Vic) (1961) 106 CLR 268 at 275 – 276 per Fullagar J; South Australia v Tanner (1989) 166 CLR 161 at 171 per Wilson, Dawson, To…
-
Roy Morgan Research Centre Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (Vic)
[2001] HCA 49
Citation 32
(Para 11)
…the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal to hear an appeal from any determination of the Trial Division when constituted by a judge. [11] Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 358 per Kitto, Taylor and Owen JJ, referring to Metropolitan District Railway Co v Sharpe (1880) 5 App Cas 425 and Chorlton v Lings (1868) LR 4 CP…
-
R v Gover
[2000] NSWCCA 303
Citation 33
…umber of cases, including Goodwin v Phillips (1908) 7 CLR 1, Mitchell v Scale (1907) 5 CLR 405, and R v Chalak (1983) 47 ALR 600 at 602, Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 360 and Jennings Industries Limited v The Commonwealth (1984) 57 ACTR5 at 21, and to Pearce on Statutory Interpretation 4th ed. at p 198. 20 The t…
-
Brogan & 2 Ors v Brammer & 4 Ors
[2000] NSWSC 613
Citation 34
…Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 358. It is the reader's (or listener's or viewer’s) own conclusion” (167B-C) . 36 His Honour went on to say: “An inference is drawn from an inference when the reader, listener or viewer draws an inference which is available in the matter complained of and then uses that inference as a basi…
-
Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Citivale
[2000] NSWCA 111
Citation 35
…Act 1956 (NSW) Licensing Act 1958 (Vic) Justices Act 1958 (Vic) Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) Stamp Duties Act 1920 (NSW) CASES CITED: Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 DECISION: Appeal allowed with costs - orders made…
-
Horizons Corporations Law Pty Limited v Rizons Pty Limited
[1999] NSWSC 691
Citation 36
…ecision of the Full Bench of the Industrial Court of New South Wales; and the decision of the High Court of Australia in Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353, in particular the joint judgment of Kitto, Taylor and Owen JJ at 360. 30 I am not persuaded that there is any collision between the Environmental Planning and Asses…
-
Etna v Arif
[1999] VSCA 99
Citation 37
(Para 15)
…I have now reached the point where the submissions of the parties diverged. A number of arguments may first be disposed of summarily. Special Condition 17, referred to for the respondents, which I have not set out, but which relates to waiver of any provision of the contract "expressed or implied", …
-
Waterhouse v David Syme and Co Ltd and 2 Ors
[1999] NSWSC 52
Citation 38
…he publisher: cf Lubrano v Gollin and Co Pty Ltd (1919) 27 CLR 113 at 118; Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 358. It is the reader's (or listener's or viewer’s) own conclusion. Attention to this distinction, in the context of the capacity to defame issue, seems to have been drawn for the first time in my judgment in…
-
R v Moran and Mokbel
[1998] VSCA 64
Citation 39
(Para 3)
…Although a considerable part of the argument was devoted to the inferences that were said to be open or not open to the jury, to my mind the task is rather, once the words spoken by the applicants are ascertained so far as that is possible, to construe and interpret those words in order to determine…
-
Horvath v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
[1998] VSCA 51
Citation 40
(Para 1)
…The difficulty then is to ascertain whether the latter statute is inconsistent in the relevant sense with the earlier statutory provision. Four observations by members of the High Court will sufficiently state the principles. In Goodwin v. Phillips (1908) 7 C.L.R. 1 at 10 Barton, J. cited this passa…
-
Roy Morgan Research Centre v Comm State Revenue
[2001] HCATrans 83
Citation 41
…MR BERGLUND: The reference is 108 CLR 353 and I believe it is in the appellant’s book, case No 26. The Court there was looking at the question of section 74(1) of the Justices Act . The issue arose because a person had been convicted on a second occasion on breaches of the Licensing Act and the Magistrates Cou…
-
Patrick Stevedores & Ors v Maritime Union of Aus
[1998] HCATrans 128
Citation 42
…Honours to them? Associated Minerals Consolidated v Wyong Shire Council (1975) AC 538,at 553 to 554, and the decision of this Court in Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 360, your Honour, are two of them.…
-
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Giraffe World Australia Pty Ltd
[1998] FCA 819
Citation 43
…must be such conflict that the words necessarily ‘import a contradiction’: see Garnett v Bradley (1878) 3 App Cas 944 at 966; Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 360; Parramatta City Council v Stauffer Chemical Co (Aust) Pty Ltd [1971] 2 NSWLR 500 at 509; …. In the absence of express repeal of earlier or other statut…
-
R v McNeill (Ruling No 1)
[2007] NFSC 2
Citation 44
(Para 16)
…place of another: Mitchell v Scales (1907) 5 CLR 405 at 417 per Isaacs J; and whether effect can be given to both Acts at the same time: Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 360. D C Pearce and R S Geddes, in Statutory Interpretation in Australia (6 th ed, LexisNexis, 2006) p 253, suggest that the more detailed and ela…
-
John Beever (Aust) Pty Ltd v Paper Australia Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2019] VSC 575
Citation 45
(Para 1)
…dly repealed the earlier’.[9] [6] Statutory Interpretation in Australia , DC Pearce and RD Geddes 8 th Ed at [7.10]. [7]See, eg, Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353, 360. [8] Butler v Attorney-General (Vic) (1961) 106 CLR 268, 276 (Windeyer J). [9] Statutory Interpretation in Australia , DC Pearce and RD Geddes 8 th Ed a…
-
Stanley Rural Community Inc v Stanley Pastoral Pty Ltd
[2016] VSC 764
Citation 46
…[11] Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353, 358.…
-
C McMunn v Director of Public Prosecutions (No. 2)
[2009] VSC 379
Citation 47
…a limited power, enabling the Court to order costs only in certain specified types of proceeding. As the High Court said in Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 at 358, where the phrase “except where otherwise expressly enacted” is used: “… no case is outside that provision unless that is the necessary result of the oper…
-
DPP v Loo & Ors
[2007] VSC 437
Citation 48
…[4](1963) 108 CLR 353 at 358.…
-
UTSA Pty Ltd (in liq) v Ultra Tune Australia P/L
[1998] VSC 13
Citation 49
(Para 1)
…In my view, however, s.1335(2) does not fall within the words "otherwise expressly provided ... by any other Act" in s.24(1) of the Act, and, therefore, does not limit the wide power conferred on the Court by that provision. As to the wide operation of s.24(1) of the Act, see Brooking, J. (as his Ho…
-
Crush and Haul Pty Limited v Environment Protection Authority
[2023] NSWLEC 60
Citation 50
…983) 78 FLR 217 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Rose v Hvric (1963) 108 CLR 353 Ross v The Queen (1979) 141 CLR 432 Shergold v Tanner (2002) 209 CLR 126; [2002] HC 19 SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 81 ALJR 1190 Taylor v The Owners – S…