-
Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Late Evidence)
[2020] FCA 1117
…– Application refused – Northern Health v Kuipers [2015] VSCA 172, applied; Capic v Ford Motor Co of Australia Ltd (Late Evidence) [2020] FCA 1117, cited – Eaton v ISS Catering Services Pty Ltd [2013] VSCA 361; (2013) 42 VR 635, cited – Billington v Sussan Corporation Australia Pty Ltd [2020] VSCA 12, cited – Cor…
-
Billington v Sussan Corporation Australia Pty Ltd
[2020] VSCA 12
Para 1
…hether or not there is a satisfactory explanation for the delay in making the application.[35] [35] Billington v Sussan Corporation Australia Pty Ltd [2020] VSCA 12, [40]. See also Cargill Australia Ltd v Viterra Malt Pty Ltd (No 22) [2019] VSC 351, [52]-[58].…
-
Cargill Australia Ltd v Viterra Malt Pty Ltd (No 22)
[2019] VSC 351
Para 1
…ation.[35] [35] Billington v Sussan Corporation Australia Pty Ltd [2020] VSCA 12, [40]. See also Cargill Australia Ltd v Viterra Malt Pty Ltd (No 22) [2019] VSC 351, [52]-[58].…
-
Westpoint Corp v Yeo
[2018] VSC 705
Para 1
…t of continued pursuit of proceedings and cease pursuit if it becomes apparent that the prospects of success do not warrant continuation.[49] [48][2018] VSC 705; (2018) 57 VR 652. [49]First Defendant, Affidavit of Michael Gordon Sloan, dated 20 November 2020, exhibit MGS-10.…
-
Charan v Nationwide News Pty Ltd
[2017] VSC 66
Para 1
…do the interests of justice dictate?[34] [34][2015] VSCA 172, [33], applying Ultra [2011] VSC 370 ( J. Forrest J). See also Charan v Nationwide News [2017] VSC 66, [18].…
-
Northern Health v Kuipers
[2015] VSCA 172
Para 1
…with a late application to adduce expert evidence, Kyrou and McLeish JJA set out the principles to be applied in a case such as the present:[22] [21][2015] VSCA 172 (‘ Northern Health ’). [22]In Thomas v Powercor Australia Ltd [Ruling No 3] [2011] VSC 391 , [13] (‘ Thomas ’), a decision to which the Court of Appe…
-
Eaton v ISS Catering Services Pty Ltd
[2013] VSCA 361
…2, applied; Capic v Ford Motor Co of Australia Ltd (Late Evidence) [2020] FCA 1117, cited – Eaton v ISS Catering Services Pty Ltd [2013] VSCA 361; (2013) 42 VR 635, cited – Billington v Sussan Corporation Australia Pty Ltd [2020] VSCA 12, cited – Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 588G, 588M – Evidence Act 2008 (Vic)…
-
Matthews v SPI Electricity Pty Ltd [Ruling No 20]
[2013] VSC 197
Para 1
…ere applicable, in a general sense, to the late service of an expert report. See also Matthews v SPI Electricity Pty Ltd [Ruling No 20] [2013] VSC 197, [38] (‘ Matthews ’).…
-
Thomas v Powercor Australia Limited (Ruling No 3)
[2011] VSC 391
Para 1
…to be applied in a case such as the present:[22] [21][2015] VSCA 172 (‘ Northern Health ’). [22]In Thomas v Powercor Australia Ltd [Ruling No 3] [2011] VSC 391 , [13] (‘ Thomas ’), a decision to which the Court of Appeal referred in Northern Health (at [29]), J. Forrest J stated that the principles set out in Ao…
-
Ultra Thoroughbred Racing Pty Ltd v Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
[2011] VSC 370
Para 1
…nciples set out in Aon , as summarised in Ultra Thoroughbred Racing Pty Ltd t/as Baree Stud v Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London [2011] VSC 370 ( ‘Ultra ’), were applicable, in a general sense, to the late service of an expert report. See also Matthews v SPI Electricity Pty Ltd [Ruling No 20] [2013] VS…
-
Namberry Craft Pty Ltd v Watson
[2011] VSC 136
Para 1
…s been expressly recognised, in particular, in two decisions of Vickery J, Namberry Craft Pty Ltd v Watson ,[121] and Hodgson v Amcor Ltd .[122] [121][2011] VSC 136, [38]. [122][2011] VSC 63; (2011) 32 VR 495, [15]-[19].…
-
Hodgson v Amcor Ltd
[2011] VSC 63
Para 1
…, in particular, in two decisions of Vickery J, Namberry Craft Pty Ltd v Watson ,[121] and Hodgson v Amcor Ltd .[122] [121][2011] VSC 136, [38]. [122][2011] VSC 63; (2011) 32 VR 495, [15]-[19].…
-
Cement Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
[2010] FCAFC 101
…pplied by the Full Court of this Court: see Cement Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2010] FCAFC 101; 187 FCR 261 (‘ Cement ’) and Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm) [2016] FCAFC 2; 332 ALR 199. That explanation will often be by affidavit fro…
-
Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University
[2009] HCA 27
…te amendment to pleadings the High Court stressed this in Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; 239 CLR 175 at 215 [103] per Gummow, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ. In the joint judgment their Honours observed that the party seeking the amendment was required ‘…
-
Opeka Pty Ltd v Mackie Group Pty Ltd
[2003] VSC 183
Para 32
…[30]See, for example, State of Queensland and Another v JL Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146; Opeka Pty Ltd v Mackie Group Pty Ltd [2003] VSC 183 at [32]–[35].…
-
Queensland v JL holdings Pty Ltd
[1997] HCA 1
…[30]See, for example, State of Queensland and Another v JL Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146; Opeka Pty Ltd v Mackie Group Pty Ltd [2003] VSC 183 at [32]–[35].…
-
Tamaya Resources Limited (In Liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm)
[2016] FCAFC 2
…mer Commission [2010] FCAFC 101; 187 FCR 261 (‘ Cement ’) and Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm) [2016] FCAFC 2; 332 ALR 199. That explanation will often be by affidavit from the party’s solicitor but as Cement at [51] itself shows it need not be and, in an appropriate case, it…