Rann v Olsen
Case
•
[2000] SASC 83
•12 April 2000
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Rann v Olsen [2000] SASC 83
[2000] SASC 83
12 April 2000
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of Rann v Olsen is an action for slander brought by Mr Rann, the Leader of the Opposition in the Parliament of South Australia, against Mr Olsen, the Premier of the State. Mr Olsen admitted making the statements complained of and that they bore a meaning that was defamatory of Mr Rann. The Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia was required to decide whether certain provisions of the Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987 (Cth) and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia prevented Mr Olsen from maintaining and supporting his defences in the action. The court held that section 16(3) of the Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987 (Cth) does not prevent Mr Olsen from maintaining and supporting his defences. The court also held that section 16(3) is a valid law of the Parliament of the Commonwealth. The court declined to answer whether the action should be permanently stayed as it considered the questions posed in the case stated were unclear and speculative.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Constitutional Law
-
Defamation Law
Legal Concepts
-
Constitutional Validity
-
Legitimate Expectation
-
Defamation
-
Qualified Privilege
-
Proportionality
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Rann v Olsen [2000] SASC 83
Most Recent Citation
Tesa Group Pty Ltd v Mining and Energy Union [2025] FCA 922
Cases Citing This Decision
234
Attorney-General (Tas) v Casimaty
[2024] HCA 31
Attorney-General (Tas) v Casimaty
[2024] HCA 31
Commonwealth v Vance
[2005] ACTCA 35
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
0
PGA v The Queen
[2012] HCA 21
PGA v The Queen
[2012] HCA 21
Supreme Court of Western Australia
[2013] WASC 186