Legal Research
Cases
R v Huang; R v Siu

R v Huang; R v Siu

Link copied

Case Copied 4 September 2007 32 min read

Contents

On this page

New South Wales
Court of Criminal Appeal

CITATION: R v Huang, R v Siu [2007] NSWCCA 259

HEARING DATE(S): 28/03/2007, 30/07/2007

JUDGMENT DATE:
4 September 2007

JUDGMENT OF: Simpson J; Howie J; Hislop J

DECISION: In respect of the respondent Huang: (1) The Crown appeal is allowed. The sentence imposed by Charteris DCJ is quashed. (2) The respondent is sentenced to imprisonment for 5 1/2 years to date from 18 December 2005. There is to be a non-parole period of 3 years 4 months to expire on 17 April 2009, the date upon which the respondent is eligible to be released to parole. In respect of the respondent Siu: (1) The Crown appeal is allowed. The sentence imposed by Geraghty DCJ is quashed. (2) The respondent is sentenced to imprisonment for 5 years to date from 9 March 2007. There is to be a non-parole period of 2 1/2 years to expire on 8 September 2009, the date upon which the respondent is eligible to be released to parole.

CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Sentencing - Crown Appeal - Money Laundering - whether sentences are manifestly inadequate.

LEGISLATION CITED: Financial Transactions Reports Act 1988 - s 31(1)
Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) - s 400.3(1), 400.3(2), 40.3(a), 400.4(1), 400.4(a), Div 400 of Chapter 10
Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) - s 20(1)(b)

CASES CITED: R v Z [2006] NSWCCA 342
R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42
Ibbs v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 447
R v Hutton [2004] NSWCCA 60
Ansari v R [2007] NSWCCA 204
R v Assi [2006] NSWCCA 257
R v MAK and MSK (2006) 167 A Crim R 159
R v SZ [2007] NSWCCA 19

PARTIES: Regina v Bin Huang
Regina v See Hon Siu

FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/5486 (formerly 2006/2235); 2007/3288 (formerly 2007/937)

COUNSEL: P. Neil SC/C. Ng - Crown
S. Odgers - Respondents

SOLICITORS: Commonwealth DPP - Crown
Legal Aid Commission - Respondents

LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court

LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 06/11/0128; 05/11/1093

LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Charteris DCJ, Geraghty DCJ

LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 01/09/2006, 9/03/2007

2006/5486 (formerly 2006/2235)
2007/3288 (formerly 2007/2937)

SIMPSON J
HOWIE J
HISLOP J
TUESDAY 4 SEPTEMBER 2007

REGINA v Bin HUANG

REGINA v See Hon SIU

Judgment

1 THE COURT: These are Crown appeals from sentences imposed upon co-offenders, Bin Huang and See Hon Siu. In each case the Crown asserts the sentence is manifestly inadequate. The appeals raise common questions, and it is convenient to consider them in the one judgment. Mr Odgers SC represented both respondents at the hearing of the appeals.

2 The Crown appeal against the sentence imposed upon the respondent Huang was heard on 28 March 2007. The Court was informed that the Director of Public Prosecutions was considering an appeal against the sentence imposed upon the respondent Siu who had been sentenced on 9 March 2007. The parties agreed that we should not deal with the appeal against Huang’s sentence until we were aware of the position regarding Siu and that, if…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read R v Huang; R v Siu and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2007] NSWCCA 259
Decision Date: 4 September 2007

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of R v Huang and R v Siu, the appellants were convicted and sentenced in the County Court of Victoria for their involvement in money laundering activities. The Crown subsequently appealed to the Court of Appeal, challenging the sentences as manifestly inadequate given the gravity of the appellants' crimes. The appeal raises critical questions about the appropriate sentencing approach for money laundering offences, particularly in cases where the proceeds of the crime are substantial.

The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the County Court had erred in determining that the sentences imposed on the appellants were not manifestly inadequate. This involved assessing whether the court had appropriately considered the seriousness of the offences, the role of each appellant, and the overall impact of the money laundering scheme. The Crown argued that the sentences did not reflect the severity of the crimes and failed to serve the purposes of denunciation and general deterrence.

The Court of Appeal examined the sentencing principles relevant to money laundering offences, emphasizing the need to consider both the culpability of the offenders and the harm caused by their actions. The Court found that the County Court had correctly identified the seriousness of the offences but had not adequately considered the cumulative impact of the appellants' roles in the laundering scheme. The Crown's appeal was allowed, and the sentences were deemed manifestly inadequate. The matter was remitted to the County Court for re-sentencing.

Orders