QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CITATION:
OP v Gollschewski (No 2) [2021] QCATA 45
PARTIES: OP (applicant/appellant)
v
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER STEVEN GOLLSCHEWSKI (respondent)
APPLICATION NO/S:
APL296-19
ORIGINATING APPLICATION NO/S:
OCR005-16
MATTER TYPE:
Appeals
DELIVERED ON:
20 April 2021
HEARING DATE:
9 April 2021
HEARD AT:
Brisbane
DECISION OF:
Judicial Member D J McGill SC
ORDERS: 1. The sanction imposed by the Tribunal on 11 October 2019 be set aside.
2. In its place, it is ordered that the appellant be suspended without pay from duty with the Queensland Police Service for a period of eight months, to take effect from 19 February 2016.
3. That sanction of suspension is itself suspended, pursuant to the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 (Qld) s 219L, for a period of two years from the date on which the appellant returns to duties with the Queensland Police Service, on condition that, during that period of two years, the appellant not commit any act of misconduct.
4. If during that period of two years the appellant commits any act of misconduct, the suspension is revoked and the suspension of the appellant from the Queensland Police Service has immediate effect.
5. If the appellant seeks any order for costs, he must file in the Tribunal and serve on the respondent submissions in writing in support of the order sought within twenty-one days from the date of this decision.
6. If such submissions are served on the respondent, the respondent may file and serve submissions in response within twenty-one days from the date of receipt of such submissions.
7. Any submissions in reply are to be filed and served within fourteen days of the service of the submissions in response.
CATCHWORDS: POLICE – INTERNAL ADMINISTRATION – DISCIPLINE AND DISMISSAL FOR MISCONDUCT – QUEENSLAND – appeal from decision of Tribunal upholding findings of sexual abuse of son and breach of bail condition – decisions set aside – on rehearing, charges not substantiated – new sanction required – sanction of suspension – sanction suspended
Crime and Corruption Act 2001 (Qld) s 219L
Aldrich v Ross [2001] 2 Qd R 235
Austin v Martin [2018] QCAT 120
Compton v Stewart [2010] QCAT 384
DA v Stewart [2011] QCATA 359
DA v Stewart (No 2) [2013] QCATA 162
Flanagan v Gee [2020] QCAT 204
Flegg v Crime and Misconduct Commission [2014] QCA 42
Harvie v Stewart [2014] QCAT 388
Kennedy v Stewart [2012] QCAT 66
Kennedy v Stewart [2012] QCATA 258
McKenzie v Wright [2011] QCATA 309
Police Service Board v Morris (1985) 156 CLR 397
Spencer v Baulch [2004] QCA 234
Stewart v Dark [2012] QCA 228
APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:
Applicant:
M Black, instructed by Gilshenan & Luton, solicitors
Respondent:
S A McLeod QC, instructed by Police Service Solicitor
REASONS FOR DECISION
This is an appeal from the decision of a Tribunal Member on 11 October 2019 in a Police disciplinary matter. The appellant had been charged with official misconduct, constituted by five matters, which had all been upheld by the…
Continue reading OP v Gollschewski (No 2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Op v Gollschewski (No 2) [2021] QCATA 45
- Case
- [2021] QCATA 45
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the Tribunal's findings of misconduct were not substantiated on rehearing and thus set aside the original decision. The Court of Appeal concluded that the appropriate sanction should be a suspension without pay for a period of eight months. The court held that this sanction should be suspended under the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 (Qld) for two years, contingent upon the appellant not committing any further acts of misconduct. If the appellant were to commit any misconduct during this period, the suspension would become effective immediately. The court also outlined the process for any future applications for costs between the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The sanction imposed by the Tribunal on 11 October 2019 be set aside.
2. In its place, it is ordered that the appellant be suspended without pay from duty with the Queensland Police Service for a period of eight months, to take effect from 19 February 2016.
3. That sanction of suspension is itself suspended, pursuant to the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 (Qld) s 219L, for a period of two years from the date on which the appellant returns to duties with the Queensland Police Service, on condition that, during that period of two years, the appellant not commit any act of misconduct.
4. If during that period of two years the appellant commits any act of misconduct, the suspension is revoked and the suspension of the appellant from the Queensland Police Service has immediate effect.
5. If the appellant seeks any order for costs, he must file in the Tribunal and serve on the respondent submissions in writing in support of the order sought within twenty-one days from the date of this decision.
6. If such submissions are served on the respondent, the respondent may file and serve submissions in response within twenty-one days from the date of receipt of such submissions.
7. Any submissions in reply are to be filed and served within fourteen days of the service of the submissions in response.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.