Kennedy v Deputy Commissioner Stewart

Link copied
Case Copied 20 min read
CITATION: Kennedy v Deputy Commissioner Stewart [2012] QCATA 258
PARTIES: Brian George Kennedy
(Applicant/Appellant)
v
Deputy Commissioner Ian Stewart
(Respondent)
APPLICATION NUMBER: APL023-12 / APL077-12
MATTER TYPE: Appeals
HEARING DATE: On the papers
HEARD AT: Brisbane
DECISION OF: Richard Oliver, Senior Member
Ken Barlow SC, Member
DELIVERED ON: 7 December 2012
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
ORDERS MADE:

The appellant’s application for leave to appeal or appeal in APL023-12 is dismissed.1.    

The respondent’s application for leave to appeal or appeal in APL077-12 is dismissed.2.    

CATCHWORDS:

Misconduct – where charge of dishonestly gaining a benefit substantiated – where dishonesty an element of the charge – whether the Tribunal made findings that the conduct of the appellant was dishonest – whether reasons demonstrate the question of dishonesty was considered by the Tribunal

Sanction – whether sanction imposed inadequate for the appellant’s conduct – where imposition of sanction an exercise of discretion – whether discretion miscarried – whether a basis established for interference with the sanction imposed

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act2009, s 142
Police Service Administration Act 1990, s 7.4(3)

R v Easton (1994) 1 Qd R 531
R v Laurie (1987) 2 Qd R 762
QUYD Pty Ltd v Marvass Pty Ltd [2009] 1 Qd R 41
Cachia v Grech [2009] NSWCA 232
Glenwood Properties Pty Ltd v Delmoss Pty Ltd [1986] 2 Qd R 388
McIver Bulk Liquid Haulage Pty Ltd v Fruehauf Australia Pty Ltd [1989] 2 Qd R 577
Police Service Board v Morris (1985) 156 CLR 397
Aldrich v Ross [2001] 2 Qd R 235
House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499

APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):

APPLICANT: Mr Zillman of counsel instructed by Gilshenan and Luton
RESPONDENT: Mr McLeod of counsel instructed by the Queensland Police Service Legal Officer

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. Mr Kennedy is a Senior Sergeant serving in the Queensland Police Service.  In 2009 he was the subject of an investigation for improper conduct which resulted in disciplinary proceedings being brought against him.  He was charged with three counts of improper conduct.  The Deputy Commissioner found that the charges were substantiated and imposed a sanction that he be dismissed from the Queensland Police Service.

  1. Sgt Kennedy applied to the Tribunal for review of the Deputy Commissioner’s decision and on 22 December 2011 the Tribunal set aside two of the charges as being unsubstantiated, and confirmed one charge. 

  1. The charge confirmed was that:

Between the 15th day of April 2008 and the 24th day of January 2009 at Mount Isa or elsewhere your conduct was improper in that you:-

(a)   Dishonestly gained the benefit of a “Trailblaza” portable camping fridge the property of the Mt Isa Police Citizens Youth Club.

Further and better particulars

Investigations have identified that a “Trailblaza” portable camping fridge was donated by Margaret Emily Albeiz for the assistance of the Mt Isa Police Citizens Youth Club.  The investigations have identified you:-

·        Utilised the said Trailblaza portable camping fridge at your (former) residence at Mt Isa;

·        

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Kennedy v Deputy Commissioner Stewart and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2012] QCATA 258
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Kennedy versus Deputy Commissioner Stewart, the Federal Court was tasked with evaluating the appropriateness of a disciplinary action imposed by the tribunal. The appellant, Kennedy, contested the tribunal's findings of dishonest conduct and the adequacy of the disciplinary sanction imposed. The tribunal had found Kennedy guilty of dishonestly gaining a benefit, a finding that Kennedy sought to challenge on appeal.

The court was required to determine whether the tribunal had correctly identified the appellant's conduct as dishonest and if it had properly exercised its discretion in imposing the sanction. The central issue was whether the tribunal had made findings that the conduct of the appellant was dishonest and whether the reasons provided by the tribunal demonstrated that the question of dishonesty was adequately considered. Additionally, the court had to examine if the sanction imposed was inadequate for the appellant's conduct and whether there was a basis for the court to interfere with the tribunal's discretionary decision.

The court held that the tribunal had indeed considered the question of dishonesty and made findings accordingly. The reasoning provided by the tribunal sufficiently demonstrated that the issue of dishonesty was appropriately addressed. Regarding the sanction, the court recognised that the imposition of the sanction was a matter of discretion for the tribunal and found that the tribunal had not miscarried in its discretion. Consequently, the court decided not to interfere with the sanction imposed by the tribunal.

The court dismissed both the appellant's application for leave to appeal and the respondent's application for leave to appeal. The orders confirmed the tribunal's findings and the appropriateness of the sanction imposed. The appellant's challenge to the tribunal's decision was unsuccessful, and the disciplinary action was upheld.

Orders

Orders of the court

The appellant’s application for leave to appeal or appeal in APL023-12 is dismissed.1.

The respondent’s application for leave to appeal or appeal in APL077-12 is dismissed.2.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.