Miller v Lida Build Pty Ltd

Case [2015] QCATA 137


CITATION:

Miller v Lida Build Pty Ltd [2015] QCATA 137

PARTIES: Peter John Francis Miller
Susan Mary Miller
(Applicants/Appellants)
V
Lida Build Pty Ltd
(Respondent)
APPLICATION NUMBER: APL201-14
MATTER TYPE: Appeals
HEARING DATE: 30 April 2015
HEARD AT: Brisbane
DECISION OF: Acting Senior Member Howard
Member Deane
DELIVERED ON: 14 September 2015
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
ORDERS MADE:

1.    The name of the first Applicant/Appellant in this proceeding be corrected to Peter John Francis Miller.

2.    Order 3 of the Decision dated 28 April 2014 is set aside.

3.    The Application for leave to appeal or appeal is otherwise dismissed.

4.    Any application for costs including submissions and evidence as to costs is to be filed in the Tribunal and a copy provided to the other party by:

4.00pm on 5 October 2015.

5.    If any application for costs is filed:

a.    the other party is to file in the Tribunal any submissions and evidence (if any) in response and provide a copy to the other party by

4.00pm on 26 October 2015.

b.    the application for costs will be determined on the papers without an oral hearing, unless a party requests an oral hearing, not before 27 October 2015.

CATCHWORDS:

APPEALS – DOMESTIC BUILDING DISPUTE – DAMAGES -  where specific issues referred back to the Tribunal – measure of damages – whether unreasonable to incur rectification costs – whether failed to properly consider valuation evidence – no demonstrated error –
whether interest on damages payable from date of decision to award damages – whether appropriate to award interest at all when damages set off against amounts payable to builder

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), s 61, s 64, s 142,s 143, s 146, s 147
Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld), s 77(2)(c)
Queensland Building and Construction Commission Regulations 2003 (Qld), regulation 34B

Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] 170 CLR 321

Bellgrove v Eldridge [1954] 90 CLR 613
Brewarrina Shire Council v Beckhaus Civil Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 361
Cicic v Snowy Mountains Hydro-Electric Authority [1964-65] NSWR 178

Ericson v Queensland Building Services Authority [2013] QCA 391
Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Ltd t/a Home Owners Warranty [2010] 241 CLR 390

Lida Build Pty Ltd v Miller (No 2) [2010] QCAT 431

Lida Build Pty Ltd v Miller and Anor [2011] QCATA 219
Lida Build Pty Ltd v Miller and Anor [2012] QCAT 137

Lida Build Pty Ltd v Miller & Anor [2013] QCATA 139

Miller & Anor v Lida Build Pty Ltd [2013] QCA 332
Lida Build Pty Ltd v Miller [2014] QCAT 129
Lida Build Pty Ltd v Miller (No 2) [2014] QCAT 179
Pickering v McArthur [2005] QCA 294

Tabcorp Holdings Ltd v Bowen Investments Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 8

APPEARANCES:

APPLICANTS: Peter John Francis Miller
Susan Mary Miller
RESPONDENT: LIDA Build Pty Ltd

REPRESENTATIVES:

APPLICANTS: Mr and Mrs Miller represented by Peter John Francis Miller
RESPONDENT: LIDA Build Pty Ltd represented by Darryl Jover, director

REASONS FOR…

Continue reading Miller v Lida Build Pty Ltd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Miller v Lida Build Pty Ltd [2015] QCATA 137
Case
[2015] QCATA 137
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In this case, the appellant, Peter John Francis Miller, brought an appeal against the respondent, Lida Build Pty Ltd, in relation to a domestic building dispute. The primary concern was the determination of damages, specifically the rectification costs incurred by the appellant. The appeal was heard by the court, which had to decide several legal issues concerning the assessment of damages, the reasonableness of incurring rectification costs, the proper consideration of valuation evidence, and the appropriate time from which interest on damages should be payable. The court examined whether the tribunal had erred in its assessment of the rectification costs and if it had failed to adequately consider the valuation evidence presented. Additionally, the court considered whether interest on the damages should be payable from the date of the tribunal's decision or from an earlier date when damages were set off against amounts payable to the builder.

The court found that there was no demonstrated error in the tribunal's consideration of the evidence and its assessment of the rectification costs. It held that the tribunal had not erred in law or failed to take into account relevant considerations. The court also concluded that it was not unreasonable for the tribunal to determine that interest on the damages should be payable from the date of the tribunal's decision, rather than from an earlier date when the damages were set off against amounts payable to the builder. The court dismissed the appeal, finding no basis to interfere with the tribunal's decision.

The court's decision was that the name of the first applicant/appellant should be corrected to Peter John Francis Miller. It set aside Order 3 of the Decision dated 28 April 2014, which pertained to the interest on damages. The application for leave to appeal or appeal was otherwise dismissed. The court ordered that any application for costs must be filed in the Tribunal and a copy provided to the other party by a specified date. If an application for costs was filed, the other party had to file any submissions and evidence in response by a later date, and the application for costs would be determined on the papers without an oral hearing, unless a party requested one by a specified date.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The name of the first Applicant/Appellant in this proceeding be corrected to Peter John Francis Miller.

2. Order 3 of the Decision dated 28 April 2014 is set aside.

3. The Application for leave to appeal or appeal is otherwise dismissed.

4. Any application for costs including submissions and evidence as to costs is to be filed in the Tribunal and a copy provided to the other party by:

4.00pm on 5 October 2015.

5. If any application for costs is filed:

a. the other party is to file in the Tribunal any submissions and evidence (if any) in response and provide a copy to the other party by

4.00pm on 26 October 2015.

b. the application for costs will be determined on the papers without an oral hearing, unless a party requests an oral hearing, not before 27 October 2015.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.