Lowe v Aspley

Case [2010] QCATA 59


CITATION:

Lowe v Aspley [2010] QCATA 59

PARTIES: Mr Timothy William Lowe
(Applicant)
v
Ray White Aspley
(Respondent)
APPLICATION NUMBER:   APL193-10
MATTER TYPE: Appeals
HEARING DATE:     4 October 2010
HEARD AT:  Brisbane
DECISION OF: Judge Fleur Kingham, Deputy President
DELIVERED ON: 7 October 2010
DELIVERED AT:      Brisbane

ORDERS MADE:

1.    Leave to appeal is granted.

2.    The Appeal is allowed.

3.    The orders made by QCAT on 31 August 2010 are set aside.

4.    The application to QCAT in Minor Civil Dispute matter no. Brisbane 2205/10 for a termination order is dismissed.

5.    Declaration made that, as at 5 October 2010 rent of $599.50 is payable by Mr Lowe pursuant to the tenancy agreement.

6.    Mr Lowe must provide Ray White Aspley, at their premises at Aspley Arcade, 1374 Gympie Road, Aspley, with a set of keys to the premises by close of business 11 October 2010.  Ray White Aspley must reimburse Mr Lowe for the expense of copying the keys upon production of an invoice showing the sum paid.

CATCHWORDS : 

APPEAL – APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL – where error of law

RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES – TERMINATION OF TENANCY – where notice to remedy breach issued – where tenant remedied breach within time – where breach waived by payments – where notice to leave issued for failure to remedy breach – whether proceedings could be brought for failure to leave – whether tenancy wrongfully terminated

Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008, ss 278, 280, 281,293, 415, 416
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009, ss 47, 138(5), 146(b)

APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):

APPLICANT: 

Mr Timothy William Lowe
(self represented)

RESPONDENT:  Ray White Aspley
represented by
Paul Hodkinson
Kim Buchanan

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. These proceedings raise questions about whether a lessor or agent can commence proceedings in QCAT to terminate a tenancy after a tenant has paid rent in the amount and by the date demanded in a Notice to Remedy a Breach of the tenancy agreement.

  2. Mr Lowe rented premises at Silver Ash Court Warner managed by an agent, Hodking Pty Ltd trading as Ray White Aspley. He fell behind in rent. The agent, on behalf of lessor, took action to recover the rent and commenced proceedings before QCAT to terminate the tenancy. 

  3. On 31 August 2010, in Mr Lowe’s absence, a member of QCAT made an order terminating the tenancy and issued a warrant for possession of the premises.

[4]  Mr Lowe applied for leave to appeal (and, if successful to appeal) the decision. Mr Lowe argued, on a proper interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (RTRA), the agent could not commence the proceedings and QCAT should have dismissed its application.

  1. In the course of the appeal, an application to stay the warrant was refused and Mr Lowe and his family were evicted. Mr Lowe then unsuccessfully applied to reopen the original proceedings.[1] During that hearing, the learned adjudicator heard from a representative of Ray White Aspley…

Continue reading Lowe v Aspley

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Lowe v Aspley [2010] QCATA 59
Case
[2010] QCATA 59
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Lowe v Aspley involved the parties, Mr Lowe as the tenant and Ray White Aspley as the agent for the property. The dispute centred around the validity of the termination of Mr Lowe’s tenancy at a property in Aspley. The case was brought before the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) and subsequently appealed to a higher court.

The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the tenancy was lawfully terminated and if the proceedings could be brought forth due to the landlord’s failure to accept the tenant’s remedy of the breach. The court had to consider whether the notice to leave was validly issued after the tenant had remedied the breach within the stipulated time and whether the breach was effectively waived by subsequent payments made by the tenant.

The court determined that the landlord’s failure to accept the tenant’s remedy of the breach constituted a wrongful termination of the tenancy. It was found that the notice to leave was issued despite the tenant’s compliance with the notice to remedy the breach. The court also concluded that the breach had been waived through the tenant’s payment of rent following the notice to remedy. Consequently, the court found in favour of the tenant, set aside the QCAT’s orders, and dismissed the landlord’s application for a termination order. The court also ordered that rent was due as per the tenancy agreement and that the tenant must return the keys to the landlord, with reimbursement for key copying costs to be provided by the landlord.

The final orders included granting leave to appeal, allowing the appeal, setting aside the QCAT orders, dismissing the landlord’s application for a termination order, declaring that rent was due, and directing the tenant to return the keys to the landlord with reimbursement for key copying costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Leave to appeal is granted.

2. The Appeal is allowed.

3. The orders made by QCAT on 31 August 2010 are set aside.

4. The application to QCAT in Minor Civil Dispute matter no. Brisbane 2205/10 for a termination order is dismissed.

5. Declaration made that, as at 5 October 2010 rent of $599.50 is payable by Mr Lowe pursuant to the tenancy agreement.

6. Mr Lowe must provide Ray White Aspley, at their premises at Aspley Arcade, 1374 Gympie Road, Aspley, with a set of keys to the premises by close of business 11 October 2010. Ray White Aspley must reimburse Mr Lowe for the expense of copying the keys upon production of an invoice showing the sum paid.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.