| CITATION: | Lowe v Aspley [2010] QCATA 59 | |
| PARTIES: | Mr Timothy William Lowe (Applicant) | |
| v | ||
| Ray White Aspley (Respondent) | ||
| APPLICATION NUMBER: | APL193-10 |
| MATTER TYPE: | Appeals |
| HEARING DATE: | 4 October 2010 |
| HEARD AT: | Brisbane |
| DECISION OF: | Judge Fleur Kingham, Deputy President |
| DELIVERED ON: | 7 October 2010 |
| DELIVERED AT: | Brisbane |
ORDERS MADE: | 1. Leave to appeal is granted. 2. The Appeal is allowed. 3. The orders made by QCAT on 31 August 2010 are set aside. 4. The application to QCAT in Minor Civil Dispute matter no. Brisbane 2205/10 for a termination order is dismissed. 5. Declaration made that, as at 5 October 2010 rent of $599.50 is payable by Mr Lowe pursuant to the tenancy agreement. 6. Mr Lowe must provide Ray White Aspley, at their premises at Aspley Arcade, 1374 Gympie Road, Aspley, with a set of keys to the premises by close of business 11 October 2010. Ray White Aspley must reimburse Mr Lowe for the expense of copying the keys upon production of an invoice showing the sum paid. |
| CATCHWORDS : | APPEAL – APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL – where error of law RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES – TERMINATION OF TENANCY – where notice to remedy breach issued – where tenant remedied breach within time – where breach waived by payments – where notice to leave issued for failure to remedy breach – whether proceedings could be brought for failure to leave – whether tenancy wrongfully terminated Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008, ss 278, 280, 281,293, 415, 416 |
APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):
| APPLICANT: | Mr Timothy William Lowe |
| RESPONDENT: | Ray White Aspley represented by Paul Hodkinson Kim Buchanan |
REASONS FOR DECISION
These proceedings raise questions about whether a lessor or agent can commence proceedings in QCAT to terminate a tenancy after a tenant has paid rent in the amount and by the date demanded in a Notice to Remedy a Breach of the tenancy agreement.
Mr Lowe rented premises at Silver Ash Court Warner managed by an agent, Hodking Pty Ltd trading as Ray White Aspley. He fell behind in rent. The agent, on behalf of lessor, took action to recover the rent and commenced proceedings before QCAT to terminate the tenancy.
On 31 August 2010, in Mr Lowe’s absence, a member of QCAT made an order terminating the tenancy and issued a warrant for possession of the premises.
[4] Mr Lowe applied for leave to appeal (and, if successful to appeal) the decision. Mr Lowe argued, on a proper interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (RTRA), the agent could not commence the proceedings and QCAT should have dismissed its application.
In the course of the appeal, an application to stay the warrant was refused and Mr Lowe and his family were evicted. Mr Lowe then unsuccessfully applied to reopen the original proceedings.[1] During that hearing, the learned adjudicator heard from a representative of Ray White Aspley…
Continue reading Lowe v Aspley
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Lowe v Aspley [2010] QCATA 59
- Case
- [2010] QCATA 59
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the tenancy was lawfully terminated and if the proceedings could be brought forth due to the landlord’s failure to accept the tenant’s remedy of the breach. The court had to consider whether the notice to leave was validly issued after the tenant had remedied the breach within the stipulated time and whether the breach was effectively waived by subsequent payments made by the tenant.
The court determined that the landlord’s failure to accept the tenant’s remedy of the breach constituted a wrongful termination of the tenancy. It was found that the notice to leave was issued despite the tenant’s compliance with the notice to remedy the breach. The court also concluded that the breach had been waived through the tenant’s payment of rent following the notice to remedy. Consequently, the court found in favour of the tenant, set aside the QCAT’s orders, and dismissed the landlord’s application for a termination order. The court also ordered that rent was due as per the tenancy agreement and that the tenant must return the keys to the landlord, with reimbursement for key copying costs to be provided by the landlord.
The final orders included granting leave to appeal, allowing the appeal, setting aside the QCAT orders, dismissing the landlord’s application for a termination order, declaring that rent was due, and directing the tenant to return the keys to the landlord with reimbursement for key copying costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Leave to appeal is granted.
2. The Appeal is allowed.
3. The orders made by QCAT on 31 August 2010 are set aside.
4. The application to QCAT in Minor Civil Dispute matter no. Brisbane 2205/10 for a termination order is dismissed.
5. Declaration made that, as at 5 October 2010 rent of $599.50 is payable by Mr Lowe pursuant to the tenancy agreement.
6. Mr Lowe must provide Ray White Aspley, at their premises at Aspley Arcade, 1374 Gympie Road, Aspley, with a set of keys to the premises by close of business 11 October 2010. Ray White Aspley must reimburse Mr Lowe for the expense of copying the keys upon production of an invoice showing the sum paid.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.