Bowie v Gela

Case [2023] QCATA 129


QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


CITATION:

Bowie v Gela [2023] QCATA 129

PARTIES:

ALBERT BOWIE

(applicant/appellant)

v

LUCY GELA

(respondent)

APPLICATION NO/S:

APL130-22

ORIGINATING APPLICATION NO/S:

MCDT328-22 Brisbane

MATTER TYPE:

Appeals

DELIVERED ON:

20 October 2023

HEARING DATE:

29 September 2023

HEARD AT:

Brisbane

DECISION OF:

Member Howe

ORDERS:

1.     Leave to appeal granted.

2.     Appeal dismissed.

CATCHWORDS:

APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL – GENERAL PRINCIPLES – RIGHT OF APPEAL – WHEN APPEAL LIES – ERROR OF LAW – where the appellant was a tenant of the respondent who was in turn a sublessor – where the respondent gave notice to leave without grounds on expiry of the fixed term – where the appellant challenged the respondent’s title to the demised premises – where the respondent served a Notice to Leave – where the respondent commenced proceedings in the tribunal for a termination order – where the registry refused to accept the application forwarded by email with online payment details for the filing fee – where the respondent made the application again but without filing fee credit details – where there was delay in the registry processing the application – where the application was two days out of time – where the Adjudicator amended the application relying on s 61 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act2009 to make the application within time – where the appellant appeals the termination order made

LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – EXTENSION OR POSTPONEMENT OF LIMITATION PERIOD – POWER OF COURT TO EXTEND LIMITATION PERIOD – where s 293(2) Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (Qld) required an applicant to make an application for termination in the tribunal within 14 days of the handover date nominated in the notice to leave – where the application was filed late due to delay on the part of the registry – whether s 61 Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act2009 (Qld) was available to extend the time for filing

Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld), s 14(4)
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act2009 (Qld), s 33, s 38, s 61
Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act2008 (Qld), s 293(2), s 415(1)(a), s 326(1)(d)

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2009 (Qld), r 31

Amos v Fett & Anor [2016] QCATA 120

Bergin v Department of Housing and Public Works [2013] QCATA 190
Campaigntrack Victoria Pty Ltd v The Chief Executive, Department of Justice and Attorney-General & Ors [2016] QCA 37
Cummings v Cairns and District Regional Housing Corporation Ltd [2013] QCATA 161
Edenborough v Mt Isa Properties & Auctioneers [2011] QCATA 231
Gower v Woodman Sales Pty Ltd [1988] 2 Qd R 15
King v TIC Realty (No 3) QCATA 104
Lowe v Aspley [2010] QCATA 59
Parr v Queensland Police Service [2021] QCA 216 Pickering v McArthur [2005] QCA 294
Pollard & Anor v Fitzgibbon & Anor [2019] QCATA 42 Trimble v Babet [2013] QCATA 081

Vignes v Clarke [1990] 2 Qd R 593

APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:

This matter was heard…

Continue reading Bowie v Gela

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Bowie v Gela [2023] QCATA 129
Case
[2023] QCATA 129
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal in Bowie v Gela involved a tenant, the appellant, who challenged the landlord's, the respondent's, title to the premises and their right to terminate the lease. The matter was heard and determined in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) and subsequently appealed to a higher court. The respondent, as the sublessor, had given notice to the appellant to leave the premises without grounds upon the expiry of the fixed term. The respondent subsequently filed an application in QCAT for a termination order, which was initially rejected due to a failure to include the correct filing fee details. After a second application, without the requisite fee details, the application was processed but was two days late. The Adjudicator, invoking section 61 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009, amended the application to be within time. The appellant then appealed the termination order made by QCAT.

The court had to determine the validity of the appeal process and the applicability of section 61 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 to extend the time for filing the application. Additionally, the court had to assess if the delay in processing the application by the registry justified an extension of the limitation period under section 293(2) of the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (Qld). The court considered whether the Adjudicator's reliance on section 61 was appropriate and if the late filing of the application could be justified under the circumstances.

The court held that the appeal was properly before it and dismissed the appeal on the merits. The court found that section 61 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 was not applicable to extend the time for filing the application. The court also determined that the delay in processing the application by the registry did not warrant an extension of the limitation period under section 293(2) of the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (Qld). The court concluded that the application was two days late, and therefore, the termination order made by QCAT stood.

The court granted leave to appeal but dismissed the appeal. The termination order made by QCAT was upheld.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Leave to appeal granted.

2. Appeal dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.