Eleven Property v Zheng

Link copied
Case Copied 16 min read

QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND


ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

CITATION:

Eleven Property v Zheng [2025] QCATA 65

PARTIES:

ELEVEN PROPERTY

(applicant/appellant)

v

YUANHUI ZHENG

(respondent)

APPLICATION NO/S:

APL368-24

ORIGINATING APPLICATION NO/S:

Q694-24 Brisbane

MATTER TYPE:

Appeals

DELIVERED ON:

15 July 2025

HEARING DATE:

On the papers

HEARD AT:

Brisbane

DECISION OF:

Member Howe

ORDERS:

1.     Leave to appeal granted.

2.     Appeal allowed.

3.     The order made by the Adjudicator on 4 November 2024 is set aside.

4.     In lieu the following Orders are substituted:

(a)     Eleven Property pay the sum of $1,590 to Yuanhui Zheng within 7 days of receipt of this Order;

(b)     Save that if Eleven Property has complied with the Order of the Tribunal made 19 December 2024 and already paid the sum of $1,480 to Yuanhui Zheng, Eleven Property only pay the balance of $110 within 7 days of receipt of this Order.

CATCHWORDS:

APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL – GENERAL PRINCIPLES – RIGHT OF APPEAL – WHEN APPEAL LIES – ERROR OF LAW – where the respondent tenant occupied a unit which suffered water damage caused by leaks from the unit above – where the appellant agents issued notice to leave on the dual bases of non-livability and significant repairs and renovations necessary – where the tenant vacated – where the tenant claimed compensation – where the claim was heard in minor civil dispute proceedings – where the Adjudicator erred in accepting the tenant was entitled to claim for compensation without establishing breach of contract – where the notice to leave on the grounds of significant repairs and renovations necessary was defective – where the tenant handed over vacant possession by the specified date on the notice to leave – where the tenancy terminated in accordance with the ground for termination provided in s 277(b) – where the residential tenancies agreement terminated on the basis of frustration – where no compensation was payable by either party – where the lessor made voluntary payment to the tenant

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), s 147

Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (Qld), s 284, s 305, s 420

Meyer v Anor v Murchie & Anor [2020] QCATA 175

Parr v Queensland Police Service [2021] QCA 216 Pickering v McArthur [2005] QCA 294

APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:

This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act2009 (Qld)

Applicant:

Self-represented by T Green

Respondent:

Self-represented

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. The respondent tenant, Ms Zheng, leased a residential unit in a unit complex from Mr Green, the lessor, through the applicant/appellant real estate agents.

  2. The tenancy was from 18 July 2023 to 18 July 2024. The rent was $595 per week.

  3. On 10 August 2023 Ms Zheng noticed a water leak in her kitchen. It did not stop and she contacted the respondent and the lessor and informed them of the leak the following day, a Friday.

  4. A plumber could not attend until the following Monday, but did…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Eleven Property v Zheng and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2025] QCATA 65
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Eleven Property v Zheng, the respondent, Yuanhui Zheng, was a tenant in a unit that experienced water damage due to leaks from the unit above, which was owned by the appellant, Eleven Property. The dispute arose when Eleven Property issued a notice to leave to Zheng on the grounds of non-livability and the necessity for significant repairs and renovations. Zheng vacated the premises, and subsequently, sought compensation for the damage. The matter was heard in minor civil dispute proceedings, where the Adjudicator ruled in favour of Zheng, granting him compensation. Eleven Property appealed this decision to the Tribunal, arguing that the Adjudicator had erred in his assessment.

The central legal issues in this case were whether the Adjudicator had correctly applied the law in granting compensation to Zheng, and whether the notice to leave issued by Eleven Property was defective. Furthermore, the court had to determine whether Zheng's tenancy had terminated due to frustration, and if so, whether compensation was payable by either party. The appeal hinged on the interpretation of the Residential Tenancies Act and the specific terms of the residential tenancies agreement between the parties.

The Tribunal found that the Adjudicator had erred by accepting Zheng's entitlement to compensation without establishing a breach of contract by Eleven Property. The notice to leave issued by Eleven Property was deemed defective as it did not comply with the statutory requirements. Moreover, the Tribunal held that the tenancy had terminated due to frustration, and thus, no compensation was payable by either party. However, the Tribunal also noted that Eleven Property had made a voluntary payment to Zheng. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered that Eleven Property pay the sum of $1,590 to Zheng, with a reduced amount if Eleven Property had already complied with a prior Tribunal order.

The Tribunal granted leave to appeal, allowed the appeal, set aside the Adjudicator's order, and substituted new orders in its place. These orders mandated that Eleven Property pay $1,590 to Zheng, with a reduction to $110 if a previous payment of $1,480 had already been made.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Leave to appeal granted.

2. Appeal allowed.

3. The order made by the Adjudicator on 4 November 2024 is set aside.

4. In lieu the following Orders are substituted:

(a) Eleven Property pay the sum of $1,590 to Yuanhui Zheng within 7 days of receipt of this Order;

(b) Save that if Eleven Property has complied with the Order of the Tribunal made 19 December 2024 and already paid the sum of $1,480 to Yuanhui Zheng, Eleven Property only pay the balance of $110 within 7 days of receipt of this Order.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.