| DETERMINATION OF APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE COMMISSION CONSTITUTED BY AN ARBITRATOR | ||
| CITATION: | Lotos Concretors Pty Ltd v Mitchell [2018] NSWWCCPD 16 | |
| APPELLANT: | Lotos Concretors Pty Ltd | |
| RESPONDENT: | Nathanial Lee Mitchell | |
| INSURER: | AAI Limited trading as GIO General Limited | |
| FILE NUMBER: | A1-1982/17 | |
| ARBITRATOR: | Mr J Wynyard | |
| DATE OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISION: | 24 October 2017 | |
| DATE OF APPEAL HEARING: | 4 April 2018 | |
| DATE OF APPEAL DECISION: | 27 April 2018 | |
| SUBJECT MATTER OF DECISION: | Extension of time to appeal: r 16.12 of the Workers Compensation Commission Rules 2011, monetary threshold to appeal: subss 352(1) and (3) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act1998 (the 1998 Act), appeal of an interlocutory decision: s 352(3A) of the 1998 Act, effect of s 66A complying agreement and the principles to be applied, reconsideration pursuant to s 350(3) of the 1998 Act, application of J C Equipment Hire Pty Ltd v Registrar, Workers Compensation Commission (NSW) [2008] NSWCA 43, Habib v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCCA 231 and Manpower Pty Ltd v Harris [2011] NSWWCCPD 10, estoppel on the basis of Commonwealth v Verwayen [1990] HCA 39; 170 CLR 394 and Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45; (1981) 147 CLR 589, procedural fairness: Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30; 90 ALR 601 | |
| PRESIDENTIAL MEMBER: | Deputy President Michael Snell | |
| HEARING: | Oral | |
| REPRESENTATION: | Appellant: | Mr B McManamey, instructed by Moray & Agnew |
| Respondent: | Mr L Morgan, instructed by KQ Lawyers | |
| ORDERS MADE ON APPEAL: | 1. The time for bringing the appeal is extended to 28 November 2017, pursuant to r 16.2(12) of the Workers Compensation Commission Rules 2011. 2. Leave to appeal is granted, to the extent that it is necessary, pursuant to s 352(3A) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998. 3. The Certificate of Determination dated 24 October 2017 is amended by deleting the order at [1]. 4. The Certificate of Determination dated 24 October 2017 is otherwise confirmed. | |
INTRODUCTION
This matter involves an application by a worker for an assessment by an Approved Medical Specialist (AMS) of his level of permanent impairment.[1] The assessment is relevant to whether the threshold for a work injury damages claim is achieved (s 313 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 [the 1998 Act]), and whether the worker suffers a degree of permanent impairment greater than 20% (making him a worker with high needs – s 32A of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 [the 1987 Act]).
[1] Application for Assessment by an Approved Medical Specialist, registered 24 April 2017 (Application).
BACKGROUND
Nathaniel Mitchell started working with Lotos Concretors Pty Ltd (Lotos) performing building work, in about 1997. Mr Mitchell, in his statement dated 3 August 2017, identifies three specific injuries he states he suffered in the employ of Lotos:[2]
(a)On 23 June 1997, he twisted his left knee while working on steel in a trench. He suffered a lateral meniscal tear, and underwent an arthroscopic…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Lotos Concretors Pty Ltd v Mitchell and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2018] NSWWCCPD 16
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered whether the applicant had a valid reason for missing the deadline to appeal and whether the applicant could show that it had a substantial question of law to be determined. The court also needed to decide whether the applicant's circumstances were exceptional enough to warrant an extension of time and whether the monetary threshold should be waived. The court considered the principles set out in Commonwealth v Verwayen and Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd, as well as the decision in J C Equipment Hire Pty Ltd v Registrar, Workers Compensation Commission (NSW). The court also considered the relevance of the principles of procedural fairness.
The court found that the applicant had a valid reason for missing the deadline to appeal and that it had a substantial question of law to be determined. The court also found that the applicant's circumstances were exceptional enough to warrant an extension of time. The court held that the monetary threshold should be waived in this case. The court ordered that the time for bringing the appeal be extended and that leave to appeal be granted, to the extent that it was necessary. The court also ordered that the Certificate of Determination be amended to delete a particular order and that it be otherwise confirmed.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The time for bringing the appeal is extended to 28 November 2017, pursuant to r 16.2(12) of the Workers Compensation Commission Rules 2011.
2. Leave to appeal is granted, to the extent that it is necessary, pursuant to s 352(3A) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998.
3. The Certificate of Determination dated 24 October 2017 is amended by deleting the order at [1].
4. The Certificate of Determination dated 24 October 2017 is otherwise confirmed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.