CITATION: LGSS v Egan [2002] NSWSC 1171 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S): SC 3648/01 HEARING DATE(S): 14 June 2002 JUDGMENT DATE: 4 December 2002 PARTIES :
LGSS Pty Ltd as trustee of the Local Government Superannuation Scheme (P)
Michael Egan, Treasurer of the State of New South Wales as Minister responsible for the administration of the Superannuation Administration Act of New South Wales (D)JUDGMENT OF: Austin J
COUNSEL : Mr R J Ellicott QC with Mr N Gye (P)
Mr M G Sexton SC SG with M J Leeming (D)SOLICITORS: Deacons (P)
I V Knight Crown Solicitor (D)CATCHWORDS: TRUSTS AND TRUSTEES - superannuation scheme - whether Minister's powers to consent and agree to trustee's application of surplus amounted to a direction inconsistent with s 58, or a discretion inconsistent with s 59, of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act - whether Minister owed fiduciary duties to scheme beneficiaries - whether Minister's decision in fraud of power LEGISLATION CITED: Superannuation Administration Act 1996 (NSW) ss 7, 48, 127
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) ss 3, 7, 10, 19, 52, 58, 59CASES CITED: Attorney-General v Breckler (1999) 197 CLR 83
Breen v Williams (1996) 186 CLR 71
Cadogan v Earl of Essex (1854) 2 Drew 227
Cowan v Scargill [1985] 1 Ch 270
Dudderidge v Rawlings (1913) 108 LT 802
Dundee General Hospitals Board of Management v Walker [1952] 1 All ER 896
Imperial Group Pension Fund Ltd v Imperial Tobacco Ltd [1991] 1 WLR 589
Karger v Paul [1984] VR 161
Lock v Westpac Banking Corporation (1991) 25 NSWLR 593
Lutheran Church of Australia v Farmers' Co-operative Executors & Trustees Ltd (1970) 121 CLR 628
McPhee v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1988) 16 ALD 77
Mettoy Pension Trustees Ltd v Evans [1990] 1 WLR 1587
Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 254
Newton v Ellis (1855) 24 LJQB 337
Pilmer v The Duke Group Ltd (in liq) (2001) 207 CLR 165
Re Beloved Wilkes' Charity (1851) 3 Mac & G 440 [42 ER 330]
Re Brockbank [1948] Ch 206
Re Courage Group's Pension Schemes [1987] 1 WLR 495
Seafarers' Retirement Fund Pty Ltd v Oppenhuis (1999) 94 FCR 594
Swan Hill Corporation v Bradbury (1937) 56 CLR 746
Wilkinson v Clerical Administrative and Related Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd (1998) 79 FCR 469DECISION: Summons dismissed
IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
EQUITY DIVISION
AUSTIN J
WEDNESDAY 4 DECEMBER 2002
3648/01 LGSS PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUPERANNUATION SCHEME V MICHAEL EGAN, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES AS MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE SUPERANUATION ADMINISTRATION ACT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
HIS HONOUR :
The proceedings
1 The plaintiff is the trustee of the Local Government Superannuation Scheme ("the Scheme"). The defendant is the Treasurer of the State of New South Wales, and is the Minister responsible for the administration of the Superannuation Administration Act 1996 (NSW) ("the SAA").…
Continue reading LGSS Pty Ltd v Egan
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- LGSS Pty Ltd v Egan [2002] NSWSC 1171
- Case
- [2002] NSWSC 1171
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the statutory powers of the Minister were not inconsistent with sections 58 or 59 of the Act. The court concluded that the Minister's powers to consent and agree with the trustee's application of surplus constituted a discretion, not a direction, as it did not compel the trustee to take any specific course of action. The court further held that the Minister did not owe fiduciary duties to the scheme beneficiaries, as the Minister's role was to oversee and regulate the superannuation industry, not to manage the individual interests of scheme members. Finally, the court rejected the argument that the Minister's decision was a fraud of power, finding that it was a legitimate exercise of statutory authority.
As a result of the court's reasoning and findings, the respondent's claims against the Minister were dismissed. The court did not make any orders as to costs, leaving that matter to be determined between the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.