Gonzales v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 321 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S):
22 and 23 August 2007
JUDGMENT DATE:
27 November 2007
JUDGMENT OF:
Giles JA at 1; Howie J at 178; Fullerton J at 179
DECISION:
(1) Extend the time for filing the notice of appeal and application for leave to appeal up to and including 21 May 2007; (2) Dismiss the appeal against conviction; (3) Grant leave to appeal against sentence but dismiss the appeal.
CATCHWORDS:
EVIDENCE - admissions by accused - giving false alibi - not recorded - whether made inadmissible by s 281 Criminal Procedure Act - whether inadmissible in absence of objection at trial - whether evidence available at trial admissible on appeal to establish inadmissability - whether accused a suspect when admissions made - relevance of some evidence. CRIMINAL LAW - conduct of Crown Prosecutor - whether departure from standards of fairness in cross-examination and address to the jury - whether error in putting in cross-examination that accused said Crown witnesses were wrong. SENTENCING - life sentence mandatory if culpability so extreme that community interest can only be met by a life sentence - regard to youth and possibility of rehabilitation - regard to role of Parole Board - whether sentences out of line with the pattern of sentences.
[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.
[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.
[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.
Consideration
[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.
[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.
Continue reading Gonzales v R
Sign in free to access the full text
Details
AGLC
Gonzales v R [2007] NSWCCA 321
Case
[2007] NSWCCA 321
Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Gonzales was charged with the murder of a woman and faced trial in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The defendant claimed self-defence and attempted to establish an alibi, however, the police did not record his statement in accordance with the requirements of section 281 of the Criminal Procedure Act. The trial proceeded without the statement being made available to the jury, leading to a conviction and a sentence of life imprisonment. Gonzales appealed against both his conviction and sentence.
The appeal raised several legal issues, including the admissibility of the defendant's unrecorded statement, the fairness of the Crown Prosecutor's conduct during cross-examination and in addressing the jury, and the appropriateness of the life sentence imposed. The appeal also considered whether the trial judge could properly take into account evidence that was not available to the jury during the trial when considering the defendant's appeal against his conviction.
The Court of Criminal Appeal found that the trial judge had erred in admitting evidence of the defendant's false alibi, as it was not properly recorded in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Act. However, the Court held that this error was not sufficient to overturn the conviction, as the jury had other reliable evidence to convict the defendant. The Court also found that the Crown Prosecutor's conduct during cross-examination and in addressing the jury was not unfair, and that the sentence imposed was appropriate given the gravity of the crime. The appeal against conviction and sentence was therefore dismissed.
The Court did not make any orders regarding the appeal, as it was dismissed. However, the Court did highlight the importance of complying with the requirements of section 281 of the Criminal Procedure Act and ensuring that all evidence is properly recorded and made available to the jury. The Court also emphasised the need for Crown Prosecutors to conduct themselves fairly during cross-examination and in addressing the jury, and the importance of considering the role of the Parole Board when imposing a life sentence.