Dean v Australian Postal Corporation

Link copied
Case Copied 22 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Dean v Australian Postal Corporation [2010] FCA 680

Citation: Dean v Australian Postal Corporation [2010] FCA 680
Appeal from: Dean v Australian Postal Corporation [2009] AATA 812
Parties: BARRY DEAN v AUSTRALIAN POSTAL CORPORATION and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number(s): NSD 1312 of 2009
Judges: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 30 June 2010
Catchwords: WORKERS’ COMPENSATION – Commonwealth employees – Psychological disorder – Employee’s perception of bullying by manager – Whether ailment was “contributed to in a material degree by the employee’s ailment” – Perception does not have to founded on reasonable grounds – Evidence must support causative link of the perception as a material contributor to the development or aggravation of the ailment – s 4 Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988-2007 (Cth)
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 43(2), 43(2B), 44
Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988-2007 (Cth) s 4
Cases cited: Alexander v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority (2010) 265 ALR 424 cited
Appellant V324 of 2004 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 259 cited
Australian Telecommunications Commission v Tzikas (1985) 5 AAR 173 considered
Civil Aviation Safety Authority v Central Aviation Pty Ltd (2009) 253 ALR 263 cited
Comcare v Lees (1997) 151 ALR 647 cited
Dornan v Riordan (1990) 24 FCR 564 cited
Gilkinson v Repatriation Commission (2008) 104 ALD 406 cited
Kirkpatrick v Commonwealth of Australia (1985) 9 FCR 36 considered
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 applied
Repatriation Commission v Cotton (2006) 93 ALD 118 cited
Wiegand v Comcare (2002) 72 ALD 795 applied
Date of hearing: 7 June 2010
Date of last submissions: 7 June 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 47
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr D Richards
Solicitor for the Appellant: Slater & Gordon Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr P S Jones
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

NSD 1312 of 2009

ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN:

BARRY DEAN
Appellant

AND:

AUSTRALIAN POSTAL CORPORATION
First Respondent

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent

JUDGE:

PERRAM J

DATE OF ORDER:

30 JUNE 2010

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The appeal be dismissed with costs.

Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court’s website.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

NSD 1312 of 2009

ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN:

BARRY DEAN
Appellant

AND:

AUSTRALIAN POSTAL CORPORATION
First Respondent

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent

JUDGE:

PERRAM J

DATE:

30 JUNE 2010

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

I  -  Introduction

  1. This case is concerned with events which took place during 2005 to 2006 at the Peakhurst delivery centre (“the Centre”) which is conducted by the respondent (“Australia Post”).  The applicant,…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Dean v Australian Postal Corporation and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2010] FCA 680
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Dean v Australian Postal Corporation, the respondent appealed a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) concerning a claim for workers’ compensation. The applicant, Mr Dean, sought compensation for a psychological disorder which he claimed was contributed to in a material degree by his employment with the Australian Postal Corporation. The primary issue before the court was whether Mr Dean’s perception of being bullied by his manager materially contributed to his psychological disorder, regardless of whether the perception was reasonable or not. The court was required to determine if there was sufficient evidence to support the causative link between the perception and the disorder.

The court examined the statutory provisions under s 4 of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988-2007 (Cth), which requires a causal link between the employment and the psychological disorder. The court held that Mr Dean's perception of being bullied, even if not reasonable, could still be a material contributor to his ailment if the evidence supported such a link. The court found that there was sufficient evidence to support the conclusion that Mr Dean’s perception of bullying materially contributed to his psychological disorder. The reasoning hinged on the fact that the employee's perception, even if unfounded, could have a significant impact on their mental health if it was a material factor in the development or aggravation of the ailment.

The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the AAT's decision, finding that the evidence supported the conclusion that Mr Dean's perception of being bullied was a material contributor to his psychological disorder. The court further ruled that the perception did not need to be founded on reasonable grounds to be considered material. The appeal was dismissed with costs, meaning the respondent was ordered to pay the applicant's legal expenses.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The appeal be dismissed with costs.

Note:

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.