Re: THE COMMISSIONER FOR SUPERANNUATION
And: CHERYL MAY BENHAM
No. ACT G14 of 1988
FED No. 111
Superannuation
22 FCR 413
COURT
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
Morling(1), Beaumont(1) and Burchett(1) JJ.
CATCHWORDS
Superannuation - retirement on ground of invalidity before maximum retirement age - Pre-existing physical condition specified in benefit classification certificate - Subsequent physical condition causing, or substantially contributing to, incapacity resulting in early retirement - Whether "connected with" pre-existing condition - Whether an aggravation of another condition caused by a certified condition is "connected with" the certified condition - Beneficial construction of legislation.
Superannuation Act 1976 (Cth), s.66.
HEARING
SYDNEY
#DATE 4:4:1989
Counsel for appellant: Mrs P. Flemming Q.C. with Miss C.C. Simpson
Instructed by: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for respondent: Mr K.J. Crispin Q.C. with Mr I.W. Nash
Instructed by: Messrs Bernard Collaery
ORDER
The appeal be dismissed with costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
JUDGE1
This is an appeal from a decision of a judge of the Court dismissing an appeal from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld an appeal by the respondent against a decision of the Commissioner for Superannuation to decline to pay invalidity benefits to her in accordance with s.66(1) of the Superannuation Act 1976 ("the Act").
Section 66(1) of the Act provides, relevantly, that, except where s.66(2) applies, an officer of the Australian Public Service who ceases to be an employee of the Commonwealth by reason of retirement on the grounds of invalidity before attaining maximum retiring age is entitled to certain benefits. Section 66(2) provides for reduced benefits to be paid where:
"(a) a person ceases to be an eligible employee by reason of retirement on the ground of invalidity before attaining his maximum retiring age;
(b) there was in force in respect of the person, immediately before the person's retirement, a benefit classification certificate; and
(c) the Commissioner is of the opinion that the incapacity which was the ground for his retirement was caused, or was substantially contributed to, by a physical or mental condition or conditions specified in the certificate or by a physical or mental condition or conditions connected with such a condition or such conditions".
The issue of benefit classification certificates is provided for in s.16. In substance, s.16(4) provides that the Commissioner, if he is of the opinion that a person is not likely, by reason of a physical or mental condition from which he suffers, to continue to be an employee of the Commonwealth until he attains his maximum retiring age, shall issue a benefit classification certificate to that effect, being a certificate in which the relevant condition is specified.
There is no real dispute between the parties as to the relevant facts. The following account of them is taken from the trial judge's reasons.
On 4 April 1980 the respondent was appointed as an officer of the Australian Public…
Continue reading Commissioner for Superannuation v Benham
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- The Commissioner of Superannuation v. Benham, C.M. [1989] FCA 111 (22 FCR 413)
- Case
- [1989] FCA 111
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the statutory language and the principle of beneficial construction. It found that the term "connected with" in the superannuation legislation should be interpreted broadly to align with the policy objectives of the Act, which include providing for the retirement of individuals on the basis of invalidity. The court held that the subsequent physical condition was indeed connected to the pre-existing condition, as it was an aggravation of a condition caused by the certified condition. This interpretation was consistent with the Act's intent to provide for retirement on the basis of invalidity where conditions substantially contribute to the incapacity.
Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal and ordered that the appeal be dismissed with costs. The judgment emphasised the importance of a broad interpretation of the term "connected with" to achieve the policy objectives of the superannuation legislation. The appeal process and the entry of orders were addressed under Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
Orders
Orders of the court
The appeal be dismissed with costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.