Burnell v Jarvis

Case [2024] QCAT 126


QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND


ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

CITATION:

Burnell v Jarvis [2024] QCAT 126

PARTIES:

CAROL ESTHER BURNELL

(applicant)

v

CHRISTOPHER ANDREW JARVIS

(respondent)

APPLICATION NO/S:

BDL194-21

MATTER TYPE:

Building matters

DELIVERED ON:

1 March 2024

HEARING DATE:

30 August 2023

HEARD AT:

Brisbane

DECISION OF:

Member Deane

ORDERS:

1.     Christopher Andrew Jarvis is to pay Carol Ester Burnell the sum of $12,083.50 by 4.00pm on 2 April 2024.

2.     Any application for costs is to be made by filing in the Tribunal two (2) copies and giving to the other party one (1) copy of any submissions and evidence relied upon, by 4.00pm on 2 April 2024.

3.     If any application for costs is made in accordance with order 2 above, then:

(a)     The other party must file in the Tribunal two (2) copies and give to the party making the application for costs one (1) copy of any submissions and evidence in response, by 4.00pm on 16 April 2024.

(b)     The party making the application for costs must file in the Tribunal two (2) copies and give to the other party one (1) copy of any submissions and evidence in reply, by 4.00pm on 23 April 2024.

(c)     Unless otherwise directed, the application for costs will be decided on the papers and without an oral hearing after 23 April 2024.

4.      If no application for costs is made in accordance with order 2 above, then there shall be no order as to costs.

CATCHWORDS:

CONTRACTS – BUILDING, ENGINEERING AND RELATED CONTRACTS – THE CONTRACT – GENERALLY – where regulated contract did not comply with the requirements of the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld) – consequences of noncompliance – where contract of no effect

TORTS – NEGLIGENCE – DUTY OF CARE – STANDARD OF CARE, SCOPE OF DUTY AND SUBSEQUENT BREACH – DAMAGES AND CAUSATION – GENERALLY – where breach of duty by builder in undertaking building work – assessment of damages

RESTITUTION – GENERAL PRINCIPLES – consideration of unjust enrichment

Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld), s 4, s 9, s 11, schedule 2

Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld), s 11, s 13, s 24, s 25, s 31, s 48
Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld), s 77, Schedule 1B s 1, s 3, s 4, s 5, s 7, s 13, s 14, s 19, s 30, Schedule 2
Queensland Building and Construction Commission Regulation 2018 (Qld), s 45
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), s 3, s 4, s 38, s 100, s 102, s 105
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Regulation 2019 (Qld), s 8

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2009 (Qld), r 86

Atkinson & Anor v Van Uden [2020] QCAT 259

Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v Owners Corp Strata Plan 61288 (2014) 254 CLR 185
Bryan v Maloney (1995) 182 CLR 609
Campbell v Queensland Building and Construction Commission [2021] QCATA 34
Canavan v Sutton [2020] QCAT 374
Cerda v Jacob [2020] QCATA 57
Ghama v Crew…

Continue reading Burnell v Jarvis

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Burnell v Jarvis [2024] QCAT 126
Case
[2024] QCAT 126
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Burnell v Jarvis involved a dispute between Carol Ester Burnell and Christopher Andrew Jarvis concerning a building contract. The matter was heard in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Burnell engaged Jarvis to undertake building work on her property, but the contract did not comply with the requirements of the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld), rendering it ineffective. The Tribunal was tasked with determining the consequences of the contract's ineffectiveness and assessing any damages resulting from Jarvis's breach of duty in performing the building work.

The primary legal issues were whether the ineffectiveness of the contract had any implications for Burnell's ability to recover damages from Jarvis and if so, the extent of those damages. The Tribunal had to determine whether Burnell could still claim damages for Jarvis's breach of duty despite the contract's invalidity. The court also needed to consider the standard of care expected from a builder in undertaking such work and whether Jarvis breached this standard, leading to the damages claimed by Burnell.

The Tribunal found that despite the contract's ineffectiveness, Burnell could still claim damages for Jarvis's breach of duty. The court assessed the damages based on the breach of duty and the subsequent harm caused by Jarvis's actions. The Tribunal ordered Jarvis to pay Burnell $12,083.50 by 4.00pm on 2 April 2024, representing the damages for the breach of duty. The orders also detailed the procedures for any application for costs, including deadlines for submissions and evidence, and the process for deciding the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Christopher Andrew Jarvis is to pay Carol Ester Burnell the sum of $12,083.50 by 4.00pm on 2 April 2024.

2. Any application for costs is to be made by filing in the Tribunal two (2) copies and giving to the other party one (1) copy of any submissions and evidence relied upon, by 4.00pm on 2 April 2024.

3. If any application for costs is made in accordance with order 2 above, then:

(a) The other party must file in the Tribunal two (2) copies and give to the party making the application for costs one (1) copy of any submissions and evidence in response, by 4.00pm on 16 April 2024.

(b) The party making the application for costs must file in the Tribunal two (2) copies and give to the other party one (1) copy of any submissions and evidence in reply, by 4.00pm on 23 April 2024.

(c) Unless otherwise directed, the application for costs will be decided on the papers and without an oral hearing after 23 April 2024.

4. If no application for costs is made in accordance with order 2 above, then there shall be no order as to costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.