New South Wales
Court of Appeal
CITATION: Building Insurers’ Guarantee Corporation v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 57504 [2010] NSWCA 23 HEARING DATE(S): 23/11/09
JUDGMENT DATE:
15 March 2010JUDGMENT OF: Tobias JA at 1; Campbell JA at 2; Handley AJA at 3 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 2 March 2010 DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs. CATCHWORDS: BUILDING CONTRACT - breach by builder - work not in conformity with plans & specifications - waterproofing system - whether system installed as effective as that specified - query whether issue one of mitigation with onus on builder. - BUILDING CONTRACT - breach by builder - whether demolition and reinstatement to produce compliance with contract reasonable - whether damages recoverable on that basis. - HOME BUILDING INSURANCE - breach of statutory implied warranties by builder – insurance - successor in title entitled to benefit of warranties and insurance - measure of damages - successor entitled to same damages as predecessor. LEGISLATION CITED: Home Building Act 1989, s 92
Home Building Amendment (Insurance) Act 2009CATEGORY: Principal judgment CASES CITED: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Waterbrook at Yowie Bay Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 224
Bellgrove v Eldridge [1954] HCA 36, 90 CLR 613,
Christopoulos v Angelos (1996) 41 NSWLR 700
Kirkby v Coote [2006] QCA 61
Luxley Electronics & Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1996] AC 344
Production Spray Painting & Panel Beating Pty Ltd v Newnham (No 2) (1992) 27 NSWLR 659
Tabcorp Holdings Ltd v Bowen Investments Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 8, 236 CLR 272PARTIES: A - Building Insurers’ Guarantee Corporation
R - The Owners – Strata Plan No. 57504FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40444/08 COUNSEL: A - T Lynch and R Francois
R - HJA NealeSOLICITORS: A - Mills Oakley Lawyers
R - Doyle Edwards AndersonLOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Equity Division LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): SC 55043/06 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: McDougall J LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 21/11/08 LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: [2008] NSWSC 1285
CA 40444/08
15 March 2010TOBIAS JA
CAMPBELL JA
HANDLEY AJA
Catchwords
BUILDING CONTRACT - breach by builder - work not in conformity with plans & specifications - waterproofing system - whether system installed as effective as that specified - query whether issue one of mitigation with onus on builder.
HOME BUILDING INSURANCE - breach of statutory implied warranties by builder – insurance - successor in title entitled to benefit of warranties and insurance - measure of damages - successor entitled to same damages as predecessor.BUILDING CONTRACT - breach by builder - whether demolition and reinstatement to produce compliance with contract reasonable - whether damages recoverable on that basis.
The respondent was the successor in title of the developer which had engaged a builder to convert a six-storey warehouse into 111 residential units and a small number of commercial units. The developer had a home building insurance policy with HIH Casualty & General Insurance…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Building Insurers' Guarantee Corporation v The Owners - Stra... and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2010] NSWCA 23
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the waterproofing system installed by the builder was as effective as the system specified in the contract. A related question was whether the issue of the system's effectiveness was one of mitigation, and if so, where the onus lay to prove such mitigation.
The court considered the evidence presented regarding the waterproofing system. It was found that the installed system was not as effective as that specified. The court rejected the argument that the issue was one of mitigation, finding that the builder had failed to meet the contractual standard. The onus was on the builder to demonstrate compliance with the contract, which they had not done.
The appeal was dismissed, and BIG Corp was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.