QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CITATION:
Bocquee v Baltus [2019] QCAT 280 PARTIES: LYNN BOCQUEE (applicant)
V
LAURENCE ANTHONY BALTUS (respondent)
APPLICATION NO/S:
BDL010-19
MATTER TYPE:
Building matters
DELIVERED ON:
17 September 2019
HEARD AT:
Brisbane
DECISION OF:
Senior Member Brown
ORDERS: 1. Laurence Anthony Baltus must pay Lynn Bocquee FIFTEEN THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-SEVEN DOLLARS AND TWENTY CENTS ($15,127.20) by 4:00pm on 15 October 2019.
2. Laurence Anthony Baltus must pay Lynn Bocquee’s costs fixed in the amount of THREE HUNDRED AND THIRTY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND TWENTY CENTS ($338.20) by 4:00pm on 15 October 2019.
CATCHWORDS: CONTRACTS – BUILDING, ENGINEERING AND RELATED CONTRACTS – THE CONTRACT – LEGALITY - where domestic building contract does not comply with Schedule 1B of the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld) – whether a breach of contract can be established
CONTRACTS – BUILDING, ENGINEERING AND RELATED CONTRACTS – DAMAGES – MEASURES OF – where contract entered into for the performance of building work – where builder is unlicensed - where builder performs unlicensed building work – where builder not entitled to consideration for performing building work – assessment of damages
TORTS – NEGLIGENCE – ESSENTIALS OF ACTION FOR NEGLIGENCE – DUTY OF CARE – SPECIAL RELATIONSHIPS AND DUTIES – OTHERS – where homeowner vulnerable – whether builder owed duty of care to homeowner – damages payable where work is defective
Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld) s 77, sch 1B s 13(2), s 13(5), sch 2
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), s 48
Basscorp Pty Ltd v Kosik [2007] CCT B411-05
Bellgrove v Eldridge (1954) 90 CLR 613
Chad Roberts Constructions Pty Ltd v Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd [1993] ABT BC9302692
Cook's Construction P/L v SFS 007.298.633 Pty Ltd (formerly trading as Stork Food Systems Australasia Pty Ltd) [2009] QCA 75
Corporation of the City of Adelaide v Jennings Industries Ltd (1985) 156 CLR 274Mertens v Home Freehold Co [1921] 2 KB 526.
Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co Ltd (The Wagon Mound) [1961] AC 388
Perre v Apand (1999) 198 CLR 180Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Ex 850; 154 ER 363
Sablewell Pty Ltd V Kirstborough Pty Ltd and Ors QBT BC9505897
Ventura v Svirac (1961) WAR 63
Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd (2004) 216 CLR 515
REPRESENTATION:
Applicant:
Self-represented
Respondent:
No appearance
APPEARANCES:
This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld)
REASONS FOR DECISION
Ms Bocquee contracted with Mr Baltus to perform tiling works at Ms Bocquee’s townhouse. Ms Bocquee says that the works performed by Mr Baltus are defective.
Background to the dispute
On 31 October 2017 Mr Baltus provided Ms Bocquee with a written quote for the tiling of the patio at the rear of Ms Bocquee’s townhouse. The cost of the works was $4,226.00. The quote states ‘no GST charged’.
The quote included the number…
Continue reading Bocquee v Baltus
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Bocquee v Baltus [2019] QCAT 280
- Case
- [2019] QCAT 280
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the contract was indeed void due to its failure to comply with the statutory requirements, which nullified any contractual obligations. Given the void nature of the contract, Baltus was not entitled to any consideration for the work performed. The court assessed the damages payable to Bocquee based on the value of the work performed, as there was no contract to provide a basis for claiming additional damages. The court acknowledged the vulnerability of Bocquee as a homeowner and found that Baltus owed a duty of care to her. However, since the work was defective, Bocquee was entitled to damages to cover the cost of rectifying the defective work.
The court ordered Baltus to pay Bocquee $15,127.20 by a specified date in October 2019, representing the value of the work performed. Additionally, Baltus was ordered to pay Bocquee's costs of $338.20 by the same date. The court's decision highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory requirements in domestic building contracts and the potential consequences for both parties when such requirements are not met. The outcome underscored the protection afforded to homeowners under the Building and Construction Commission Act, ensuring that they receive fair compensation for defective work.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Laurence Anthony Baltus must pay Lynn Bocquee FIFTEEN THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-SEVEN DOLLARS AND TWENTY CENTS ($15,127.20) by 4:00pm on 15 October 2019.
2. Laurence Anthony Baltus must pay Lynn Bocquee’s costs fixed in the amount of THREE HUNDRED AND THIRTY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND TWENTY CENTS ($338.20) by 4:00pm on 15 October 2019.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.