Legal Research
Cases
Arnotts Ltd v Trade Practices Commission

Arnotts Ltd v Trade Practices Commission

Case [1990] FCA 473 10 August 1990

Jurisdiction

Judicial Review

Natural Justice & Procedural Fairness

Administrative Law

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

GENERAL DISTRIBUTION NOT REOUIRED

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) 1 No. VG 61 of 1990
1
GENERAL DIVISION 1
ON APPEAL from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal constituted by Mrs. H. E. Hallowes, Senior Member
B E T W E E N :
IRENE LUCIEW
Applicant

A N D :
Respondents

JUDGE MAKING ORDER: KEELY J .

DATE ORDER MADE: 8 OCTOBER, 1990
PLACE ORDER MADE: MELBOURNE

the Federal Court Rules.)
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION NOT REOUIRED

MINUTES OF ORDER

RECEIVED ,

THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 0 9 OCT 1990
FEDERAL COURT OF
1. The appeal be dismissed.

The applicant pay the costs of the respondent.

(Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt in Order 36 of

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
1
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

1 No. VG 61 of 1990
1
GENERAL DIVISION 1
ON APPEAL from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal constituted by Mrs. H. E. Hallowes, Senior Member
B E T W E E N :
IRENE LUCIEW
Applicant

A N D :

COMMONWEALTH 0 F
A U S T R A L I A a n d COMMISSION FOR THE SAFETY. REHABILITATION
AND COMPENSATION OF
COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYEES
Respondents

8 OCTOBER, 1990 KEELY J .

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

This is an appeal by Irene Luciew ("the applicant") Tribunal"), given on 1 February 1990 which set aside a

from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ("the

determination ("the Determination") of a Delegate of the Commissioner for Commonwealth Employees Compensation ("the Delegate"), made on 29 July 1988.
The Determination of the Delegate was in the following

Determination

1. On the evidence before me, including specialist medical evidence, I find that the effects of the injury have now ceased.
2. Now therefore, in pursuance of the provisions o f the Compensation (Commonwealth Government Employees) Act 1971, I hereby determine:
On and from the date of this determination, the Australian Bureau of Statistics is not liable to pay compensation to Irene

Luciew . "

The grounds of the appeal, as amended by leave at the hearing, were in the following terms:

"(a) That the decision appealed against was
wrong in law.

(b) The decision appealed against was one which on the whole of the evidence should not have been made.
(c) The decision appealed against was one which was contrary to the provisions of the Compensation (Commonwealth Government Employees) Act 1971 and the Commonwealth Employees' Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988.
(d) That in coming to its decision the said Administrative Appeals Tribunal should have

suffer a compensable injury, the physical found that the Applicant continues to
and psychiatric effects of which have not ceased and in respect of which the Respondent continues to be liable pursuant to the provisions of the Compensation (Commonwealth Government Employees) Act 1971 and the Commonwealth Employees' Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988.

(e)

That it was not open to the Tribunal, on the material before it, to find that the injury suffered by the Applicant was an aggravation, acceleration…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Continue reading Arnotts Ltd v Trade Practices Commission

Details

AGLC: Arnotts Ltd v Trade Practices Commission [1990] FCA 473
Case: [1990] FCA 473
Decision Date: 10 Aug 1990

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, Irene Luciew appealed against a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, which had set aside a determination by a Delegate of the Commissioner for Commonwealth Employees Compensation. The Delegate had determined that Luciew was no longer entitled to compensation for an injury sustained during her employment. Luciew argued that the Tribunal's decision was wrong in law, contrary to the relevant acts, and should not have been made based on the evidence presented. The central legal issues revolved around whether the Tribunal erred in law or fact when affirming the Delegate's decision.

The court held that the appeal was limited to questions of law, and the Tribunal's findings on matters of fact could not be reviewed unless there was an error of law. The court found that none of Luciew's grounds of appeal raised a question of law. Specifically, the Tribunal's conclusions on whether Luciew's injury had ceased, her capacity for work, and the nature of her condition were matters of fact and did not involve legal error. The court affirmed the Tribunal's decision and dismissed the appeal, ordering Luciew to pay the costs of the respondent.

In summary, the court upheld the Tribunal's decision, finding no legal error in its assessment of Luciew's compensation claim. The appeal was dismissed, and Luciew was ordered to pay the costs of the respondents.

Orders