-
Wallace v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections
[2023] NZHC 2248
Citation 1
(Para 11)
…31 See R (on the application of G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 57, [2004] 2 AC 208 at [11]–[13]. See also Harry Woolf and others De Smith’s Judicial Review (8th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2018) at [5-148].…
-
Morrison v Financial Markets Authority
[2023] NZHC 1654
Citation 2
…83 See Todd on Torts, above n 73, at 473. 84 Attorney-General v Daniels [2003] 2 NZLR 742 (CA); and R(G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 57, [2004] 2 AC 208. 85 See Todd on Torts, above n 73, at 481. 86 At 481. 87 Universal Declaration of Human Rights GA Res 217A (1948), art 8; International Covenant…
-
R (on the application of G) (FC) (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondents)
[2009] UKHL 26
Citation 3
…n of my noble and learned friend Lord Hope of Craighead, in R (G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 57, [2004] 2 AC 208, at paras 81 and 100.…
-
R (on the application of A) (FC) (Appellant) v London Borough of Croydon (Respondents) and one other action
[2009] UKSC 8
Citation 4
…ontemplate that such a duty would be owed to any particular individual, whereas this House has clearly held, in R (G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 57, [2004] 2 AC 208, that the duty in section 20(1) of the 1989 Act is owed to the individual child.…
-
Ahmad, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Newham
[2009] UKHL 14
Citation 5
…ithin their area. This does not give any particular child a right to be provided with a particular service: see R (G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 57, [2004] 2 AC 208. In the case of social housing, there is not even a duty to provide it, although there is a duty to have and to operate a lawful all…
-
G, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Southwark
[2009] UKHL 26
Citation 6
…7, and prays in aid certain passages from the opinion of my noble and learned friend Lord Hope of Craighead, in R (G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 57, [2004] 2 AC 208, at paras 81 and 100. Discussion It is important to recall what the Barnet case and the linked cases of R (A) v Lambeth London Borou…
-
Kent County Council v. G and others
[2005] UKHL 68
Citation 7
…ced by the position in judicial review proceedings, recently considered by the House in R(G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 57; [2004] 2 AC 208). I appreciate, of course, that it is not always possible to draw a hard and fast line between information-gathering and service-providing. Some information…
-
M, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
[2008] UKHL 14
Citation 8
…section 17 and Schedule 2 are target duties owed to the whole community rather than to individual children: see R (G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 57, [2004] 2 AC 208.…
-
A and B, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health (Rev 1)
[2017] UKSC 41
Citation 9
…Next Mr Coppel QC for the Secretary of State relied on a passage from the speech of Lord Hope of Craighead in R ( G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 57; [2004] 2 AC 208 at para 91 where, in relation to the target duty the target duty in section 17(1) of the Children Act 1989, he said:…
-
A, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Croydon (Rev 1)
[2009] UKSC 8
Citation 10
…ty would be owed to any particular individual, whereas this House has clearly held, in R (G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 57, [2004] 2 AC 208, that the duty in section 20(1) of the 1989 Act is owed to the individual child. These days, Parliamentary draftsmen are more alive to this kind of debate. T…
-
Poole Borough Council v GN & Anor
[2019] UKSC 25
Citation 11
…thority to provide a range and level of services appropriate to meet the various needs of children in its area: R (G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 57; [2004] 2 AC 208, para 109. In relation to the provision of accommodation, it is necessary to bear in mind the observations of Lord Hope of Craighead…